Summary

Bernie Sanders criticizes the Democratic Party for neglecting the working class, leading to their recent election losses.

He highlights issues like economic inequality, job displacement, healthcare costs, and foreign policy as key concerns for the American people.

Sanders questions whether the Democratic leadership will address these issues or remain beholden to big money interests.

  • ytsedude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The only focused Democratic message for the past 8+ years has been, “We need to stop Trump,” which I agree with, but without Trump, I can’t think of a single, unified message. That’s not enough to get the general population fired up and excited to vote for Dems. One thing that made Obama so popular was he had specific goals and gave people hope.

    Trump, in the meantime, has been feeding people all sorts of promises and hopes and dreams. They’re all terrible and full of shit, but that is a more powerful message than just, “We need to stop Harris.”

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m also legitimately convinced that the average American person is just an asshole and likes other assholes. Trump is the most conceited, whiney, cry baby, know it all, jagoff and everybody knows it. He wears it like a medal. And people love it man. They just eat it up.

      It’s just like Carlin said. The politicians come from us. Because they are us.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 days ago

        Trump is the most conceited, whiney, cry baby, know it all, jagoff and everybody knows it. He wears it like a medal. And people love it man. They just eat it up.

        That’s the thing. I’m sick of the media painting this as a “they’re holding their noses and voting” thing. This dude doesn’t win despite his vulger rallies and his racist, sexist, homophobic, crazy, whiney, criminal, and arrogant behavior… He wins because of that shit.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        I don’t know, I try to be a little more optimistic. over 250million eligible voters, only 70million voted for Trump. That’s less than a 1/3 and could be lower if you included the entire population. People will spend extra time to pursue things that will benefit them directly, there just needs to be better communication about the good things that will benefit them for their time, not the things to be fearful of because people will tune that out (as shown by the voter turnout).

  • Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Hi. Working tradesman. I still voted blue even when the 4 years under trump were mostly better for me than under Biden. Of course most likely coasting off of Obama’s era. But I got no relief under Biden. I pay $20k a year for my Healthcare and still have to pay thousands a year out of pocket for visits. My family in Ukraine is still unsure what’s going to happen in the next year. Many of brothers in my local are unemployed now during the hardest time to pay to live. We hear the record profits the corporations made and swindled the working class dry so we can eat yet there has been no relief. How did making 6 figures for a family of 5 turn into almost living pay check to pay check.

    I’m ok with sacrifice if it means others get the help they need. But I don’t think anyone got the help they needed. We sacrificed for no benifit to anyone but the elite, and we are continuing to be ignored.

    This is what Sanders is talking about. And I’m afraid of what Trump is going to do for many Americans. For my Ukrainian family back home. For my neighbor who is Taiwanese. But recently I’m more worried to keep food on the table for my kids. I don’t even care who won anymore. I have election and political fatigue. I did what was asked. I keep doing what everyone thinks is right. But I’m burning out.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      This comment spoke to me. I’m in the trades as well. I vote blue because, its further left than I can get from the red party.

      Best of luck. We will need it.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      You’re likely eligible for your states Medicare subsidies. Democrats fixed the family glitch in 2022, so you’ll likely save thousands switching off your employer plan, even if you’re making low six figures.

      Of course those subsidies expire in 2025, and there is a snowballs chance in hell of those getting renewed now.

      Democrats did a lot of things to improve the lives of working class, at least as much as they could get pass the Republican house.

      Their problem is messaging. They are terrible at communicating what they’re doing, and how it’s going to help. I mean part of that problem is the media (ie fox news) is allowed to lie and Dems try to tell the truth. The playing field is not really level.

      • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        Another headache is that everything dems do is means tested, so you’ve got to jump through a bunch of hoops to figure out if you’re even eligible for any new program. Even if the programs do give relief to people, it’s much harder to message on a complicated program with layers of bureaucracy rather than “everyone gets 3k per child no matter what.”

        • Consumer2747@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 days ago

          I’m in social work and this is huge. Trying to sign people up for these programs feels so invasive. I regularly apologize for the invasion of privacy and the implied judgement of these means-tested forms.

          This is the legacy of the Clintons and those that followed them giving credit to the idea that you have to prove you’re deserving. Not only do means-tested programs have a negative psychological impact, they’re stupidly inefficient. They require lots of outside labor to make them even marginally effective.

          The people who need them often barely have time/energy to take care of themselves, so you end up needing this whole extra layer of professionals to help them through the barrier. They all need grant it state funding of their own. All that money could be more efficiently distributed if the gates were gone, or even designed to be useable by the people who need them, in the circumstances they’re in.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        I really wish the DNC would get a blowhard demagogue cult of personality lying piece of shit like Trump to be their figurehead and then just actually do good shit once in office. Like read the fucking room man, you’re playing to sound policy when the people are voting for bloviating dickheads. Just be one of those and then worry about doing the right thing. Quoth Trae Crowder a few years back: “Do you want to be right, or do you want to win?”

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    God fucking dammit he should have been the fucking president in 2016. Fuck this timeline.

  • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Man, if he’d form a populist left party and stop caucusing with the Dems, he might get a lot of enthusiastic support and candidates running locally soon

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      A third party, eh? Nah, he needs to take over the Democratic Party once and for all.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    He’s partially right.

    Unfortunately, I think the bigger issue is that a majority of Americans are fascists or indifferent to fascism.

    “But are there not many fascists in your country?"

    "There are many who do not know they are fascists but will find it out when the times comes.”

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      majority of Americans are fascists or indifferent to fascism.

      I’m not convinced of that at all. Here’s what I see:

      A large portion of ignorant uneducated and easily manipulatable people who don’t even know what fascism is.

      • Large groups of religious people who focus on voting red because Christianity, their churches, pastors, and religious groups, and the abortion issue.

      • Actual bigots. There’s a lot of them and they like the racism, anti gay, nationalism, deportation stuff. Want women subjugated.

      • Bullies, tough guys, “alpha male”, and the “get money” crowd. There’s a lot here too, and many in poor young black and Hispanic groups in addition to a lot of white males. Not necessarily bigots, but generally want women subjugated whether they know it or not (sex objects).

      • The large group of just vote red without thinking because it’s what family and friend circles do and always have.

      The above I think don’t understand fascism at all. Not educated or informed enough.

      Edit: I would say to be “indifferent to fascism” you have to actually understand what it is, and I don’t think much of the maga crowd does. My opinion/speculation.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah I also don’t agree. You honestly have to discard a lot of public information to force yourself into this level of ignorance. For nine years he’s told us he’s a proud piece of shit. If they didn’t listen for that long that’s on them.

        • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 days ago

          Is it really so hard to believe that’s exactly how millions upon millions of people go about living their lives?

          Yes, that does seem completely insane to people like you and me who don’t tolerate that level of willful ignorance in ourselves, but to someone else that’s all just noise that they tune out.

          Ever heard the phrase, “Hell is other people“? I’m slowly starting to believe this existence is a punishment.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            I didn’t say it’s hard to believe. It’s hard to stomach it, is my point. Yeah hell really is other people. After this, I now fully believe that most Americans wouldn’t piss on me to put out a fire.

            We will always be known as a shameful group of probable idiots as a country, and we also will be known as happily setting the first huge fascist domino up then slapping it down carelessly. Autocrats around the world just got a blueprint that will work if they take advantage of idiots properly. We fucked the world, not just ourselves.

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Completely disagree, a person doesn’t have to understand what fascism is to be a fascist or indifferent to fascism, any more than they need to be an expert on dogs to not kick or oppose kicking one.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 days ago

          Actually I changed my mind and disagree with my other comment LOL.

          I still find it hard to call an extremely ignorant uneducated person a fascist, who is being manipulated by an actual fascist leader. They’re just potentially being manipulated. The dumber they are, the easier to manipulate.

          Some or even many of these people conceivably would change their stances and choices if provided with lots of education. Some.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Kindly, I disagree again lol.

          Indifferent:

          Having no particular interest or concern; apathetic

          I still argue you need to understand it to be indifferent about it specifically. However, I do believe these people are indifferent to having a desire to learn what fascism actually is and actual historical contexts.

          But we can agree to disagree 😀

          Edit: oops “to be a fascist” yes I’ll agree with you on that one sorry. They can be fascists without actually knowing that they are and how to define it.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    The DNC needs to allow voters to elect who they actually want during the primary. We were force fed Hillary because the DNC didn’t want Bernie. We didn’t even have a primary because we were force fed Biden, then given Harris because Biden was so unelectable. The DNC must allow democratic process to take place so that voters elect the presidential candidate that they want.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Democratic party aside, Bernie couldn’t get the votes. I actually think the news media has been a much much bigger problem with someone like Bernie getting power. They always try to paint someone like him as being radical, when anywhere else in the world he would be a normal person on the left.

    • shadowfax13@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      we don’t do that anymore, having “democratic” in party name is enough. be prepared to have liz cheney as nominee with ben shapiro as her running mate in 2028.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    The what party? America still has more than one political party?

    Edit: I don’t mean ‘both parties are the same, you knuckleheads.’ I mean there won’t be a Democratic party by the next election. There won’t be any parties but the Republican party.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        Oh don’t worry! That’s what the checks and balances is for. There will always be a check to the executive branch. Sure the executive branch is Republican but the Senate won’t be-… Well wait okay it is but at least the house-… Well alright they’ll have the executive branch, the house, and the Senate, but the judicial branch is still going to be able to-… Well at the very least two of them are about to retire and will be replaced with ppl hand picked by president so th-…

        Well at least the ice cream machines at McDonald’s can be fixed independently now… That’s something right?

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      50/50 on that one. It’s just as likely they keep an opposition party to keep up appearances as many dictators do and have sham elections.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Bernie is correct for the 100th time. But is little too late now. Unless Dems are serious about tackling working class issues. I don’t see anything changing. Many people view the Dem party not for the average person anymore.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      The party is done. I switched to being a Independent. The machine is too big to change from the outside, and those that are the inside are blind to what is happening to regular people that would result in voters not showing up or just voting for a Fascist.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Every path people have tried to reform the party or change course ends up dead end. I’m over it. I’m not doing the whole lesser evil shit anymore. I wish them the best because I don’t want Republicans to endlessly win. Until Dems choose to stand for something collectively, outside donor interests all the time. It will be a loop of them losing elections.

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 days ago

      Do people mean anything other than commodity and gas prices when they say “working class issues?” I feel like abortion, healthcare, education, and student loans are also working class issues, but I take it that’s not what people mean.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Agreed 100%.

      If they did this, they would easily carry states with high populations of blue collar and union laborers. Stop paying lip service and actually do it.

      States that have had major manufacturing centers in the late 20th century like the Rust Belt.

      Like…Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

      The Democratic party is just paying the price for ignoring blue collar middle class voters since the late 80s. They took those votes for granted, and they lost them over time. Just like after blue collar folks they then took the votes of minorities for granted…and now they’re losing those.

      All they need to do is ask what they’ve done for these people lately…like in the past few decades. And when they came really answer that in any terms other than what they prevented the other guys from doing, they shouldn’t have to wonder why enthusiasm for their party’s candidates is at an all time low.

      Literally ZERO people I know personally have actually liked and actively, enthusiastically supported any democratic presidential nominee since Obama. That’s twelve fucking years and zero candidates that got people excited and inspired. Most of my friends voted for these candidates, but nobody liked them.

      Honestly, if it weren’t for the opposition being so unbearably awful, I’d almost be happy to see the Democratic party handed loss after loss until and unless they learn their lesson and stop taking their base for granted.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Nah i dont think yall are willing to do it. 2028 you’ll be holding your nose again voting for an out of touch moderate to oppose trumps third term instead of giving a progressive you completely agree with any kind of chance.

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wonder why Bernie and other progressives don’t band together and announce their own party. With enough big names (especially Bernie) they could gather enough attention to be a viable third party that actually represents progressive and more left leaning ideas than the democrats. They have two years until the next local elections to get their foot on the race, I think they could get done traction if they actually go for that

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 days ago

        We already lost. The time is now to work on something new. Tuesday and the 60 days before it were shut up and vote. Today and the next 3.5 years are shout and organize.

    • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Bernie purposefully did not do that because he did not want to be seen as another Ralph Nader. He believed working inside the system would do more good than doing a dirty break. I also wish he went in the direction of a break from the democratic party, but that’s just not who he is.

    • chaonaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      There is a lot of “invisible” work that party orgs do. If you want to see why big names and attention alone don’t work, look at the Green Party. They have name recognition, ballot access and even get a bit of the vote each presidential election. What they’re missing is the “ground game” that gives the presence in nearly every race in every precinct, and the local engagement to actually win an appreciable chunk of elections every year (not just the presidential years).

  • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yesterday and today feel like I’m reliving my mom’s election loss back in 2016. I was too young then to understand the weight behind what was going on at the time, although I did at least understand why Trump seemed like a dumb candidate. Anyways, I distinctly remember how when it was obvious that Hillary lost, even though she won the popular vote, that something wasn’t right. My mom was sobbing while looking for places to move into, since we were moving out anyways. Now, 8 years later, I’m having those exact same feelings as she did except with my boyfriend on my side, knowing very well that come January that if nothing happens, we could very well be one of his first targeted groups. I fucking hate this timeline, man.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      I like your spirit but the Democratic brand and party are entirely dead. Someone will have to start a new progressive party (which will be coopted by capitalism as soon as it shows promise)

      • Intergalactic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 days ago

        Establishing a new political party is often a challenging and resource-intensive endeavor that may struggle to gain traction. Instead, a more effective approach may be to launch a political movement, advocacy organization, or even form a caucus within an existing major party, such as the Democratic Party.

        Drawing from my experience as a former chair holder for the Ohio Green Party, I saw firsthand how difficult it is for smaller parties to sustain momentum and influence. The Green Party was consistently unorganized and unstable, making it challenging to build long-term support or advance impactful policy agendas. Many of these organizational challenges are common across emerging parties, which often lack the resources and structure to compete effectively in a two-party system.

        In contrast, launching a movement or organization allows for focused advocacy, mobilization, and influence on public opinion or legislation without the structural and financial constraints of a party. Additionally, establishing a caucus within an established party, like the Democratic Party, enables you to align with its broader base while still advocating for distinct goals and principles, potentially gaining a platform and influence within the party’s framework.

        These approaches often provide a clearer path to impact than attempting to overcome the structural obstacles of party formation, allowing for dedicated action and coalition-building within a stable framework, especially in the electoral college system. We have to be realistic here.

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah, just like the republicans. Its the part of all this leftist shaming on here never addressed. I voted democrat because they were the lesser of two evils. At no time did I think they were going fix whats broken.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    Spoiler alert: They will remain beholden to big money interests and continue to lose. God damn it.

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    I hate to defend a major party, but it does feel like people expect Democrats to fix all the nation’s problems when they have utterly no power to do so.

    The reality is most Americans are not with Bernie on the things he’s talking about. The average American has been heavily propagandized by the corporate media (not just news media, all of it) to love corporate stuff. Capitalism good, socialism bad, cheap gas good, electric stoves bad. Go to most Americans in the rust belt, that’s how they think.

    If Democrats are supposed to skip to the part where they implement policies that no one currently supports outside of liberal intellectual circles with all the power they supposedly have, that’s skipping to the end. What’s Bernie’s solution for getting people outside of Vermont on his side to begin with?

    • splonglo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yougov US: Support for universal health care - 55.9 % vs 24.4% oppose

      Can’t find much data on the corporatism stuff, but don’t think that’s true either