All you rich people who think you can break any law you want, let this be a warning roadmap

This post has been reported for violating rule 4:

Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

The article has changed the title since this post was submitted.

Down voted. Saw community name. Angrily up voted.

Ahh. The good ole junk drawer.

I’ve had one in every home I’ve lived, even when I was the minor.

Wife says the same.

This comment was reported as hate speech.

America is a melting pot. As such, if this speech was against an idea, it’s no more hate speech that ati-fascist speech.

We have a ton of idiots advocating for billionaires, who would gladly toss us into a volcano.

While there are people that are good, enough bad people voted or didn’t vote that this comment breaks no rules.

Locking. About 50 reports. I’m a volunteer, and don’t have enough time for this.

Class traitor?

For upholding the rules equally?

I don’t like rich people, but glorifying murder is still glorifying murder.

Fuck off.

Last post was locked due to a ton of people advocating violence.

Let’s not repeat that, please.

Generally, no.

Valve just isn’t my enemy.

We have a ton of the free games. They give away a bunch to get you to use them.

Never paid for one from them, though.

If your enemy is going to help you beat them, let them.

Bad example.

They aren’t asking them for the sake of Medicaid.

This is any person, even single-payer patients (ones paying for themselves), because a state law tying a facility receiving federal funding to a requirement to ask nationality.

Please, read the article next time.

Fuck.

I had a snappy comeback until I realized this wasn’t abstract.

I’ve lost my mom, my dad, step sister, foster parents, and adoptive parents.

I don’t know the loss you feel. I’m sorry.

The loss of someone you chose to be a family with must be much stronger.

I hope it gets easier while the fond memories get stronger.

Care to explain that? Are you actually quoting someone, or is it meant as read? Are you calling trans people perverts?

The most recent conversation we had (read each image bottom-up while reading the images one at a time, from top down, because Lemmy):

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Image 4

Image 5

Next, for full context - our first interaction in DMs:

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Finally, the guy you were arguing with I removed comments, for the same reason.

I had completely forgotten about this until you attacked me here.

Ahh. I had to scroll for a while to find it, but this was my last message on that topic:

perma ban for fighting people with the usage of misinformation.

Yes the Nazis famously led by whom? Context matters, bringing up Nazis is invoking Hitler and implying jd is literal Hitler. No, I mention that the way was already going to point out the ineptitude of your choice of date, 1938 being the most apt for your situation. The word evemy, I already offered the definition, you either lack reading ability, simply didn’t read it and you’re being wildly obtuse. We agree, why are you being a Vance right now? Ed: I’ll provide another > one that is antagonistic to another - especially : one seeking to injure, overthrow, or confound an opponent You*** stop an opponent you destroy an evemy***.

Opponent and enemy are the same in the goal, but not always the same in the motive. You try to beat the opponent/enemy, in the method proscribed in the actions being taken.

During WW2 but before the us entered? What a dumb question, of course but that time they were already running concentration camps. Are you implying jd Vance is literal Hitler and runs concentration camps in his backyard I guess? I sourced you the definition. I say he’s my opponent which does not imply violence, you say he is your enemy which does imply violence and you’re also berating me because I agree with you but refuse to use violent vitriolic language. Neat, logic that one out yourself.

He’s an opponent, he’s someone I stand against, he isn’t my enemy. Because when I say enemy I mean someone who needs to be removed from society by any means possible. You seem to use it as someone you don’t appreciate. Enemy: >a person who hates or opposes another person and tries to harm them or stop them from doing something: Opponent: a person who disagrees with something and speaks against it or tries to change it: I’m fairly sure by news rules calls for violence are specifically against the rules and I’m not sure why you would call for violence given that is the only difference in meaning between the two words.

Enemy (From the Oxford Learner’s Dictionary):

a person who hates someone or who acts or speaks against someone or something

In short, you twist words to your desires, and you talk down to people, insulting them, and their abilities.

I’ll be hopping another client to post full screenshots of all our discussions, as right now, I’m being painted as an ass, without context.

Care to share an example of this? I’m all for learning and growing, and maybe we can resolve this hostility in a non-hostile manner.

I wish you the best with your anger issues.

Fuck, this his hard. As a father of a gay child, and a trans child, our immediate plans are passports.