• Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, I follow the presidental race somewhat because it has global impact, but watching the debates is not worth my time, and I’m fairly certain it’s not worth anyone’s time, especially non-americans.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plus it’s unlikely to change anyone’s mind. At this point you’re either pro or anti Trump and you’ve had at least eight years to pick your side.

                • LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s obviously a common vernacular simplification from authoritarian with a broad definition. This is a commonplace and accepted vernacular in most modern western media based social media outlets.

                  Fascist can be liberal, they can also be conservative. Or communist. Or almost anything. More often fascists will lie and say they are more socialist than many of their policies would lead you to reasonably expect.

                  Grown ups are talking. Go play outside. You obviously need to touch grass, child.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re both right wing, but moderate right wing bought by corporate interests isn’t the same as fascist. It’s trending towards fascism, sure, but it’s less likely to go on a killing spree.

            • PopShark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              A side as opposed to either side is how it should be. But don’t take my word for it, George Washington allegedly warned us of the potential perils of a two-party system on his deathbed but I’m unsure if that is common myth or actually true

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                George Washington eschewed political parties because he didn’t want to establish a precedent where his choice as first president set the standard everyone else had to conform to, and there’s a little irony in people holding him up as an example in that light more than 200 years later.

                He, and the other founders largely, disliked political parties in their entirety, not just having some specific number of them.
                They also built the system that enshrined the two party dichotomy as the only option, actively sought to ensure that the “right” people could override the will of the people if needed, and founded the parties they had previously argued against.
                They are far from infallible bastions of correctness in this matter.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s what modern elections are, and maybe even all historical elections, though I’m not old enough to determine that. What elections should be is throwing your support behind someone that you think is going to be beneficial for everyone. I know that is idealistic, and unfortunately the current system makes that basically impossible, but Washington said that partisan politics would be the downfall of this country, and his words are playing out in front of us. I really wish we would throw the parties, and lobbyists, out and force candidates to run on policy and merit.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                See, you’re talking partisan politics, I’m talking “you literally have to pick someone”. We’ve had these candidates before. You already know which one you’re going to vote for. You picked your side four years ago when you were asked the same question.

                Beyond that though, there’s “parties” and then theirs “sides”. One side is xenophobic, homophobic and actively wishes harm on a lot of people. The other side doesn’t, for all their flaws.
                There are more parties than there are sides in the past few elections.

                By saying you think you should vote for someone who will be good for everyone, you’ve picked a side. The side that doesn’t want to do good for only the “right” people, or make sure only the “right” people get hurt.
                The only question is if you’ll vote for that side to win, or if you’ll let idealism or anger drive you to vote otherwise.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I shall, once again, for the 6th time in my life, hold my nose and vote for the milquetoast candidate the DNC has foisted on us. I wish we had RCV so I could vote for someone good, like Bernie, or heck I’d almost take Vermin Supreme at this point.

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not that us outsiders like to watch your elections closely. But we need to since they’re gonna have a big impact on the world we live in, whether we like to admit it or not.

  • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The conspiracy theorists all say Joe is supposed to step down and Gavin Newsom somehow is added to the ticket which then will win. These conspiracy theorists also say that candidates are selected in advance by the powers that be and it’s all pagentry to deceive the gullible masses. Was this debate really an unepected plot twist, or was it planned?

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its … horrible how you treat your elderly in closed wards.

    I shall avert my gaze.
    Didn’t mean to pry, it was just too loud to not notice it.

    I’d rather look at our … increasingly hard-right EU politics … wait, that can’t be right, wtf.

    • quatschkopf43@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We used to say that conservative politics in the EU would still be considered left in the USA. Well, I‘m not so sure about that anymore.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, in previous years we did pass some environmental laws (like banning internal combustion cars), not as much or as strict as I hoped, but change was there. Sure hope that doesn’t all get undone ‘to boost the economy’ (in the USA sense - so help the existing big corps to boost their profits & do nothing for the majority).

        Hell, I rally like the vast majority of EU regulations (various directives and delegated acts) that were passed & are being constantly updated (to keep up with the times/trends & tech) over the last 20 years, I think its a rally good balance between protecting the people whilst at the same time working with the market to actually achieve a meaningful & painless change over several years. That’s why we have representatives. The added “bureaucracy” as companies call it is just extra reporting & testing (to confirm compliance with standards). This benefits us all & is of unbelievably marginal cost when you look at the economy, regardless of what lobbyists say.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As part of the CUSMA trade agreement, I think us Canadians and Mexicans are allotted one sigh of disappointment…

    Como parte del acuerdo comercial T-MEC, creo que a los canadienses y los mexicanos se nos permite un solo suspiro de decepción…

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mexicans should absolutely be keeping an eye on American politics. Especially since half the debate was: Sir please explain how much you hate Mexicans and what you’ll do to prevent any Mexicans from entering our fair country and how you’ll remove the Mexicans problem when you’re in power.

      Trump: internment camps, American Auschwitz if he can

      Biden: further tighten border control and further restrict ability to obtain legal entry

  • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Too late, I watched it all. It would have been funny if it hadn’t been so sad.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well I suppose the answer I’d give is that because of how right-wing the US is compared to much of the Western world, it becomes a patient zero for whatever the far-right is cooking up - which inevitably influences far-right groups in other Western countries

    • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Word.

      Putin planted his seed with Trump in his greatest enemy (democracy/America). It quickly caught on & has spread globally.

      Hundreds of Billions of dollars in US defense hasn’t done a thing to halt the attacks on democracy Putin has wraught with a few million spent on his troll army.

      The man can’t carry out a physical attack for shit, but his cyber attacks have no equal, only willing collaborators (Murdoch et al, the maga army).

        • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s no fanfic. It’s assessing the enemy. Kind of important to do if you want to beat em.

          Don’t be a snowflake. The right is claiming that territory madly.

          • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’d rather believe Trump is result of foreign interference, that our own institutions would never result in this without being sullied from outside. It’s fan fic, it’s Cold War nonsense.

            Trump is the consequence of our political systems, of our spiteful culture, of our economics that promises success and leaves people sick, broken, and in debt. So what if the Russians had a few hundred Facebook posts? That “seed” would not have taken if the soil weren’t already fertile. Frankly, I don’t think it made a difference. We were barrelling toward Trump with or without the oh so spooky slavs typing on a keyboard.

    • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I follow closely what is happening in the US from France because even though we have a very different culture I still think US politics is a preview of what’s to come here.

      Right now I consider we are at the step where our media are crumbling and becoming unable to properly inform us. A step that has been reached a couple of years ago in the US in my opinion.

      The next step will probably be our own coup attempt in a few years and a steady increase in the division of the country and far right movements.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But think of all the popcorn we are able to consume watching you shitshow. This is way more entertaining than the usual movies, series, and shows that you produce!

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How is this fascist right wing shit show not a global debacle? Putin, Netenyahu, Bolsanaro, Trump, Modi… Italy & Germany both rolling right. North Korea (of course) jumping on the Russian bandwagon and Xinny the Pooh.

    Does Britain’s finally dumping the Tories (after a decade & a half+) make them one of the few to break left at this time on the global stage? {Something about broken clocks being right from time to time.}

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No I wouldn’t think that about the UK. Tories shifted massively rightwards over the past decade and they are really losing most voters to Reform - a hard right party, so they are simply not hard-right enough for most voters, meanwhile Labour has shifted massively right to occupy the space Cameron-style neocons were in before.

      The right win in the long run because if labour wins, the dynamic will be of that between Cameron-esque conservatives under Starmer Labour and hard-right conservatives under Reform/UKIP/whatever Farage party as the two major parties. This is the final form of the overton window shift, on which the UK and US led the world on in 2016.

      If anything the lib Dems - if you take their manifesto at face value - are far more progressive than Labour at this point and don’t adopt the “managed decline” style of governance.

      This is where the UK FPTP system might actually work well, Reform could get as many as 17% of votes, ahead of Tory 15% and become the 2nd largest party, and yet end up with like one parliament seat because they dont end up with a majority in any one county this time around.

      The only hope then is that Starmer is just secretly a really good guy who won’t say so because the tory media would eviscerate him on culture war shit, that he survives the power struggle of a labour seat supermajority and kicks out the likes of Duffield and Streeting.

  • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In german media there is so much content about america even I sometimes get confused whoch country I actually live in.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least you can tell where something happens by place names, I get headlines ‘12 shot in Manchester gun fight’ or ‘Birmingham man kills 8 in roadrage incident’ and there’s just no way of telling it’s America… OK, well those examples are obvious but the point stands.

  • weker01@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would love not knowing about any debate but lemmy is like: Nope you’ll read American “news” if you want to or not.

    So next time keep your national humiliation fetish private please

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t look at American centric communities then. You’re the curator of your experience, not everyone else.

      • weker01@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean I wasn’t really serious as we are in a shit post community right now.

        But do you realize how fucking hard it is to keep US politics out of your experience here? So many seemingly unrelated communities post election bullshit it’s not even funny :/

        I do think that the next presidential US election is important not only for Americans but the world. Although it really is tiring to watch from over here and I can only imagine how tired most Americans must be…

    • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      Interlingua
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Indeed. I created a Lemmy account the moment I saw an opportunity to block US-specific communities. But alas, US content makes it onto other, more general communities as well (like politics on the memes community)

      • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some cunt could post a meme about a samurai in Cote/ d’Ivoire eating a durian fruit and some yank would still say “Ya that’s such a democrat thing to do brah”