• 21 Posts
  • 729 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle

  • One main difference with IPFS is that you can change the shared data without having to re-distribute a new link. It’s also based on reciprocal sharing instead of benevolent sharing, which means that if someone shares then it grows the sharing capability of the network instead of using it up.

    I have made some comparatifs, you are all welcome posting any questions you have here or there ofc. ☺️ !


  • Sort of P2P, it’s a sharing system based on reciprocal sharing (I share yours because you share mine), add sharing the same data several times and you get robustness.

    A sort of decentralised file system.

    Please let me know what you think about it all.

    PS. Funkwhale seems interesting, gotta check that out, thanks!













  • Hello, interesting!

    Q1 So it is basically IPFS but you encrypt the data first?

    Q2 If a node changes address, how is that handled?

    Q3 Isn’t splitting up data making it just more vulnerable? => Seems they use a RAIDish system and calls tgat “splits”

    Q4 What kind of encryptions are used?

    Q5 How do you access the data? Is there a link or do you have to have the whole nide setup?

    Q6 Can you access other peoples data (with their permission)? If yes, how so?

    Q7 Why do you have both static and dynamic data, why not go with dynamic all the time?

    Edit: I sincerely doubt their clame, not a biggie but nonetheless:

    : Tahoe-LAFS is the first Free Software/Open Source storage technology to offer provider-independent security. Provider-independent security means that the integrity and confidentiality of your files is guaranteed by mathematics computed on the client side, and is independent of the servers, which may be owned and operated by someone else.