• SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    In my experience people who are against more Ukraine aid think that the dollar amount we send is actual cash that can be spent in other places, rather than pallets of munitions that don’t keep forever anyway.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s literal economic stimulus, US sends them old shit, and buys new and more expensive shit from local military suppliers. This is the “creating jobs” thing the right likes so much, except when it’s against Russian interests

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yes, but it is really inefficient. If we simply ignore the nuke threat it would probably take the US a month of bombing to restore pre 2014 borders.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      And a part of that is old stuff that would be decommissioned so the cash is to make the new products. Or so I have understood it.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Even for new weapons and ammo it is usually just spending on the local weapons manufacturers so basically just supporting your own economy.