what are non-prestigious unsuccessful unprofitable talentless hobbies associated with losers I can pick up? Not joking, I hate doing any “talented” hobbies.

I’m not quite sure what it is you’re looking for. Do you mean a hobby where it’s not something you can get better at over time?

Believe it or not I wasn’t being serious.

What if Trump really is for the people and he’s jus putting them all in one convenient location…

Edit: this is a joke

Lorenz, who was a technology reporter for The New York Times from 2019 to 2022 and a columnist for the Washington Post from 2022 to earlier this year, also posted the photo of another insurance company CEO with a birthdate and a blank date of death. (That post has since been removed.) And she reposted a post that said: “hypothetically, would it be considered an actionable threat to start emailing other insurance CEOs a simple, ‘you’re next’?”

God damn that rivals some of what I’ve read here

Edit:

She added, “Me surfacing commentary that OTHER people post like Jenny, is not me endorsing those people and their posts. I can’t believe I have to explain to a reporter in 2024 that retweets are not endorsements.”

Exactly. I recognised the T-1000 but didn’t recall the context of the scene.

Of course some people didn’t? It’s over thirty years old.

Edit: to put it into perspective, the movie’s release is closer to the breakup of the Beatles than to the present day.

Me too, but not everyone can actually. Still doesn’t mean this is worthwhile. Look up anauralia (the sound version of aphantasia, which is a lack of mind’s eye visually).

(sorry to anyone who discovers they have it from this comment)

Not even a little bit? What leads you to this conclusion?

You think they’ll stop at Ukraine? If Russia continues to encroach in Europe it will affect you in USA. Just a matter of time.

K

U

No way Jerry would do it without Michael Richards.

I

T

I too have mastered the art of fading away into a blur of pixels.

abstract, semi-psychedelic image depicting androids with fleshy and plant-like appearance experiencing connection and emotional data transfer of contact through port in lower face

Need to be careful with wording or bing will reject it

Edit: a lot of that wasn’t even implemented but I still like the result

So far I’ve been happy with it. I’m not paying enough to see its factuality scores.

Not an ad, but this is why I like Ground News. It aggregates that stuff so I don’t need to be continually checking a specific publication.

Not an instance, but there’s !antiquememesroadshow@lemmy.world

If I weren’t so perpetually indecisive…