• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    28 days ago

    Sure, more Palestinians will die

    Sure, Ukrainians will die

    Sure, US minorities will die

    Sure, the entire world will suffer from a fascist demagogue at the head of the most powerful country in the world

    But have you considered that, for a few brief moments of time, we created a lot of value for the shareholders we got to feel smug over the SHITLIBS who wanted to prevent fascism?

    • logos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      But what else am I gonna do with my feelings of impotent rage? Try to actually change something?

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    People refusing to vote for Harris becuase of a foreign conflict they understand nothing about is peak stupidty.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      27 days ago

      “I completely understand the Palestine/Israel situation, I’ve watched multiple tiktoks about it!!!”

    • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      Not very hard to understand killing civilians, children and women is a bad thing to do and shouldn’t be supported.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        She’s supporting genocide in the same way you are supporting slavery by buying your electronics from China. When are you turning yourself in and going to prison??

        Or is this line of reasoning and logic idiotic and unreasonable as you damn well know it is.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      27 days ago

      Granted, I don’t know much about the conflict. I’ve read about it on Wikipedia and it gets more and more nuanced and complex at every turn.

      HOWEVER.

      There are candidates who advocate for stopping the killing. This is not a high bar. This is a bar I would like to see Kamala reach.

          • Wrench@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            It’s almost like the frequent commenters in lemmy advocating against either real candidate, or more specifically, against Dems, have ulterior motive besides helping as many Gazians as they can.

            Almost like their arguments are in bad faith to achieve a particular political result.

            Go figure.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Tbh that’s a fair point, although careful what you wish for since that could get him elected

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        27 days ago

        A simple google will provide you with articles like this : Harris says bloodshed in Gaza is devastating, emphasizes support for hostage and ceasefire deals

        Meanwhile Trump is calling for the extermination of Palestinians.

        GTFO with this double standard both sides bullshit.

        If Israel running a war causes you to not vote for the non fascist, you are simply a massive moron, nothing else.

        I’m using the general “you” I don’t mean you OP

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Yeah, because that worked out so well when in 2016 when Trump got elected, the GOP got multiple Supreme Court picks, multiple federal judges were given life terms, and Roe vs Wade got struck down. Let’s see how that plays out when Ukraine falls, war breaks out in Europe, America becomes a theocratic dictatorship, and what little progress we may have seen with the environment completely falls apart and the world goes full tilt towards becoming an uninhabitable hellscape. Whatever the protest was about will be utterly meaningless.

    If you want to protest, you protest AFTER you get sympathetic ears into office, not after you get the opposition elected. Trump gets in, then suddenly he’ll give you plenty to protest about, vs protesting when Harris is in office and she actually has a willingness to listen to protests and meet their demands.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      27 days ago

      If you want to protest, you protest AFTER you get sympathetic ears into office,

      This is exactly why the railroad strike failed lmao.

      Even UAW’s future strike plan is May 1, 2028, which is strategically a presidential election year, 5 months before the election.

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        If you’re that dialed in to the railroad strike this long after the fact, you are absolutely aware that Biden helped get the unions their biggest demands shortly after ending the strike.

        Get your bad faith soundbite bullshit out of here.

      • chaonaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        The UAW struck after the railroad strike. And got Biden to personally come down to ask the what he could do to secure their vote. Both happened while Biden was in office. What are you even saying about why the railroad strike failed?

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    It really depends on which state you live in whether or not you have the luxury of a protest vote. If you live in NY state that has a 20% lead for Harris, sure, some people can vote Jill Stein or something. But if you live in a state that actually might be close or not an obvious blowout, you can’t vote that way. You actually have to be tactical with your vote, not idealistic or symbolic.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    A large portion of the people you’re referring to are Arab Americans. In fact, Trump is now leading with them. I also think Trump would be worse for Palestinians than Harris, but I doubt the best way to convince Arab Americans of that is with condescending memes about how they don’t care about the Middle East.

  • Cleggory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Everyone who doesn’t support a corporatist duopoly is lazy, dumb, and/or working for the geopolitical rival to my dominant hegemonic country!

    One can only wonder why you have not convinced more people with your message and Harris is now losing.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Democrats constantly coming up against fascism and fumbling the bag is always someone else’s fault.

        Nader, Howard Dean, ACORN, Citizen’s United, the SCOTUS, lazy uniformed voters, radical leftists and tankies, the Internet, the DSA, Russia, 16000 green party voters in a state with 4.5M ballots cast.

        Two organizations are never to blame. You can’t blame the Democrats, because they are the most hyper-competent data-driven poll-optimized party to ever exist. And you can’t blame the Republicans, because they just worked harder to win based on their strong fundamentals and simply convinced more people with their very popular fascist policies.

        When Dems win, they have to compromise with Republicans to achieve a bipartisan consensus. When Dems lose, they have to capitulate to the Republicans because that’s what the voters asked for.

        Paid to fucking lose. I swear to God.

    • chaonaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      Who else is looking forward to–regardless of the outcome of this election–being told throughout 2025 that it is of vital importance that we get in line with the Democratic party above all else so that we can ensure that the Republican candidate does not win the 2030 election?

  • UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    27 days ago

    From now on, whenever I encounter someone who says they’re not voting/voting 3rd party, I’m gunna ask if they’ve tried to reach out to their representatives trying to get them to raise some support for what they believe in. Or if they’ve tried nothing and are now just giving up. These people are literally supposed to work for us.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Believe it or not, even democratic reps are unreachable when it comes to antiwar positions. Yeah they might be “civil” to your face, they will hear you complain, but then send you a form letter in response, telling you that nothing’s going to change and that’s good actually. Feels like they could just say “fuck you” and save some steps, but I guess that’s just Democracy™ in action.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    Usually they live in blue states that will partially insulate them from the consequences. Or they’re young and don’t understand knock on effects yet.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    Social media psyops don’t require all of the people to be puppets. You just spread some ideas around that get picked up by normal people, make some opinions get seen by the right people, etc. They are mostly not starting fires, but are simply adding a tiny bit of fuel here and there, which gets amplified by the internet.

    All of the excessive online moderation actually works against it. When I started using the internet, there was a golden rule: “don’t believe anything on the internet”. Nowadays people think platforms will only show them the truth, but in reality you’re being put into a filterbubble, an echo chamber of an opinion that keeps fueling itself.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    The concept of electing Trump to help Palestinians is basically the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard, but I guess some people might legitimately believe it.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    I would say they feel there is no personal/social benefit from electing one over the other. The reality is the tarriffs and mass deportations are the stupidest fucking I’ve ever heard and likely will piss away more money and people than COVID did.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Such people who buy into this logic aren’t all that bright. Accelerationists without a comprehension of entropy or a capacity of how this might impact a whole range of other vitally-important issues like women’s rights or Ukrainian civilians among dozens over others.

    Alas, we know a lot of this is fueled by foreign propaganda.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Selfish and dumb people may as well just be (involuntary) Russian puppets.