• _lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    296
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    It straps you to the seat so when the plane suddenly drops 50 feet due to turbulence your dumbass doesn’t launch into the ceiling.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah, and this is a much more frequent thing than crashes. I’ve been on planes multiple times when there was sudden turbulence and people without seatbelts lifted out of their seats. I don’t think any of my personal experiences resulted in someone hitting their head, but that happens. There was just video of one earlier this year.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      21 days ago

      I have observed that “very clever” people on the internet have a tendency to disregard solutions that are only partial, even if there is little to no downside to them.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        21 days ago

        “Oh yeah? Why should I be wearing a seatbelt in a car when it won’t even save me if we crash head-on into a semi truck at 100 kph?”

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        If you play the SNES version of Monopoly, you can play against CPU opponents. Mind you, this is artificial intelligence coded in 1992, on a cartridge with about 16mb of storage space for the entire game. Only a fraction of that is dedicated to the AI decision process.

        If you propose a trade, I’ll give CPU $5 in exchange for $0, the CPU will respond with NO DEAL!!!

        But if you propose "I’ll give you $100 in exchange for $0, the CPU replies “IT’S A DEAL!!!”

        The CPU was holding out for a bigger handout!

        Unrelated, but if you hold the B button, and don’t release, you’ll keep looping the shaking the dice animation. They use digital photo scans of a real hand/arm…if it were disembodied. And the animation looks like he’s just jacking off.

        • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          You weren’t kidding.

          Edit: I see now you said SNES, can’t find a good animation of that one though. But I can see in the screenshots that it’s a pseudo-mocap human hand and yeah, that would be worse.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        I often see that in political arguments. There’s much to be said about wasting political capital on a poor and partial solution, but as you said, people bitch even if there’s no real downside.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Never been on a flight never assumed I would be afraid of flying however that sounds horrific, so thanks for giving me a new fear of flying.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Can’t really let random stuff like that with a low injury profile bother you. You’d end up fearing and respecting escalators in that case.

        Reminds me of the time the brakes gave out on the L’enfant Plaza escalator for the DC Metro after the Rally to Restore Sanity (a lot good that did). Everyone was piled on going down and it just gave up the ghost and accelerated at full speed to bring them all down in a pile.

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W5MbQaInrjc

        For reference, the DC Metro is quite deep underground.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      And when there’s a collision on ground. And when the pilot just breaks too hard after landing.

  • textik@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    20 days ago

    If you follow avherald.com for any length of time, you’ll learn that 1) the vast majority of aviation incidents are completely benign, and 2) the vast majority of injuries aboard airliners are caused by passengers not wearing their seatbelts. The seatbelts aren’t there for the once-a-decade crash; they’re there for the once-a-month strong turbulence event, which the airplane itself will barely even notice.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    20 days ago

    In the event of catastrophic damage leading to explosive decompression it should keep you from being sucked out into thin air. Like if the roof tears off like that one time. Or that Boeing thing. Or that other Boeing thing. Or that other other Boeing thing.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      Similar to a car crash, you are generally safer in your padded engineered metal box than being thrown out of it, or thrown around inside it.

      It’s like the difference between dropping a carton of eggs vs a bunch of loose eggs in a box.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Stupid question here, I guess, but why isn’t there a system to potentially deliver commercial passengers and crew to the ground in case of a crash? Military jets have ejection seats and parachutes, so why don’t we have at least something required for commercial aircraft in the same vein?

    Is it the money that it would undoubtedly require?

    Edit: misspelling

    • AlotOfReading@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 days ago

      Throwing untrained people out of a commercial airliner at high speed in the middle of a emergency is a good way to ensure no one survives. The equipment would add a significant amount of space, fuel and maintenance burden too, and require major compromises to the aircraft design itself. All to resolve a problem that effectively never happens.

    • mistermanko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Some valid answers are already given by other commentators. Just want to highlight that commercial airlines are operating barely cost positive. Every extra bit of cost added has to be at least covered by some other stream of revenue. How much more money can a seat in these crammed airliners make to cover the cost of R&Ding and maintaining additional safety measures?

  • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    God these comics are absolute trash, I don’t think I’ve ever seen an EFC that didn’t have an offensive art style and horribly mediocre punchline.

        • kokopelli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I think the general absurdity of it, plus you’re never quite sure where they’re gonna go.

          For example:

          • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            It’s absurd in such a predictable way though, when every joke is le wacky literalism or I-want-to-die, it becomes rote.

            Like, okay, there’s the cum betweener, he cums between people. That sure is the opposite of what they said would happen in the first panel. Please clap.