• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    A few more days. Please, just gotta hold off a week and a half. After that, I can shift gears from “Fuck’s sake please just support the non-fascist candidate against the literal fascist” to “These are the problems in this fucking country and they need to be addressed, and fuck Harris if she doesn’t”

    Just spare us an immediate future of fascism. Buy yourselves, and ourselves, more time to work. Even if you think this is ONLY buying time, buy it. Because things are NOT going to be easier to organize under a fascist regime - and the idea that the more people suffer, the more they’re inclined towards your, specific, political views, is just not borne out by reality.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      Third parties have some valid ideas and I don’t oppose voting them in down ballot to create an alternative to the two main parties.

      But voting for them as presidential candidates right now means that I’m effectively voting against my ideals.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        28 days ago

        Until third parties have a presence at the national level it’s stupid to vote for one for president.

        If you think Democratic presidents don’t get anything done with a Republican Congress just wait until both sides of both houses refuse to work with a third party president.

      • testfactor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        I do think it depends on where you live. In about half of states, your vote for president is meaningless. Mississippi isn’t going blue and Massachusetts isn’t going red. In those cases, voting third party has the chance to effect future federal election funding.

        But yeah, if you’re in a state with literally any chance at all of being a toss up, don’t vote 3rd party.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      It’s selection bias on their part, they’ll point to the fall of the Tsar and say “see, see, revolution comes from oppression!”, and ignore what happened to the communists in Germany, lol.

      They really have a hard-on for violent revolution, when peaceful revolution may still be an option…

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    For anyone who honestly believes in third party stuff: try supporting ranked voting at the local and state level. Once we have more ranked voting at local and state levels, it will be easier to push that at the federal level, which is the best way to solve strategic voting problems in presidential elections.

    Nobody would support ranked voting for presidential elections if that’s the first time they hear about it. But if people use it already in local elections, and see that it works better, then extending it to presidential elections is a logic choice.

  • Anas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    I’m not American

    I’ve seen this meme shared going back to “3 months before the election”. When people have been protesting for way longer than that, and not only have they been ignored, but silenced, I’m not surprised when they turn to more drastic measures to be heard.

    EDIT: well, this makes sense, it was you who posted the previous memes lol

      • Anas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        I don’t think people are bringing up third parties because they will get elected, I think they’re bringing up third parties to show that these are not guaranteed, but still potentially obtainable votes, that if you take their demands into account, you will get their votes.

        EDIT: again, not American

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        They haven’t built any third party to anything meaningful yet.

        Sure “they” have! The Russians have built a third party that manufactures fake outrage and sows chaos that attempts to drive a wedge between left and far left opinions.

        The fun won’t end after the election, and (won’t be) until Putin and his FSB are buried under the Kremlin.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    27 days ago

    Lemmy.ml is all about this right now. The idiots… They claim to want things to lean more left, then they help the right with their narrative.

    Ever since coming here (Lemmy) I’ve started to develop a solid bias against the far left. They are defeating their own goals when they do this shit.

    For the record, I’m independent but I vote blue because the GOP is insane.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    Funny you should choose this meme picture of a Pakistani cricket fan when their third party actually succeeded because people didn’t fall for the usual two party propaganda of “they’ll never succeed until we first fix X problem”

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Were they polling at 3% a week before election day? In a FPTP system? Without ballot access in enough areas to actually win the election they claimed to be running in?

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    27 days ago

    Hi, I’m bloodfart. You may remember me from such posts as:

    “I voted for party for socialism and liberation and you can too!”

    And:

    “They’re running Claudia de la Cruz on a platform of Palestinian statehood and an end to arms shipments to Israel”.

    But today I’m here to talk to you about how psl is eligible for enough electoral votes to win a landslide victory.

    You see, people working on behalf of one of the two major parties often deploy the argument that a third party can’t win, so you shouldn’t vote for them. Due to the tireless work of politically active, committed anti genocide Americans just like yourself, psl can get 474 electoral votes this November!

    So get out there and vote psl! She can win if you vote for her!

    • javasux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      27 days ago

      She can win if you vote for her!

      What the literal fuck are you smoking

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        27 days ago

        There was some dem candidate for whomst people said “she can win if you vote for her”.

        It’s nice to bring out the ol’ throw back lines from time to time.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I see the bad faith actors making a final push.

      And look! Here’s one now!

      The PSL is a trash option. It has a barely above zero chance to successfully scratch its own ass let alone become a viable candidate. And in the event that they accidentally manage to get themselves elected, all their batshit promises they’ve made will never see the light of day because they don’t actually work when pressed against reality.

      And reality is where we live.

      DO NOT LISTEN TO THESE PEOPLE THAT ARE TRYING TO SPOIL THE ELECTION.

      They are not here in good faith.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        27 days ago

        One batshit promise that a president de la Cruz could make good on is not supplying weapons to israel by executive order, conditioning non military aid on a ceasefire and halting aid approved by congress due to its illegality under international and domestic law using the power of the justice department.

        Harris could make good on that too, but Harris is in favor of the genocide so she won’t.

        • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          It is absolutely a bat shit promise. She has no clue how politics work to even suggest that she could do that. This is why no one is taking you or her seriously. She’s a nobody with about as much experience as she has a chance to win. Which is ZERO

          It seems to me and from the responses you get, that from others, that you aren’t here in good faith. You’re obviously pushing a spoiler candidate. And you know it. So, having said that- it’s fair to think that you and those like you will probably vanish soon after the election.

          It’s also fair to think that no one here will have a problem with this.

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            26 days ago

            I agree with you though that I probably won’t be posting in the political memes community after the elections.

            I browse by active/all and aside from the predictable ones blaming a Harris loss on the left I don’t think the community really interests me.

            The only reason you see me here now is because in active/all there are a bunch of posts blaming me and people like me for the democrats failings or shaming us or our votes.

            Once that goes away I probably will too.

            And you’re right that people will probably be happy about it. No one likes to be confronted with the irrefutable fact that they are supporting genocide.

            That really bugs me. This whole presidential election cycle has been pretty scary to be honest. I can’t imagine a scenario where Harris wins and her party decides to abandon the deportations, war, protest suppression, border wall and genocide that got them there.

            • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              26 days ago

              So you admit to being a troll. Finally! It’s good for people to see you admit your purpose here.

              • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                26 days ago

                I’m almost 100% sure that seeing something making fun of you and popping in to say “hey wait a minute!” Isn’t anyone’s definition of trolling.

                How did you come to the conclusion that I’m a troll?

          • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            26 days ago

            What stops the president from not sending weapons to israel by executive order? What stops the president from conditioning aid or stepping in when congress tries to send weapons to aid a genocide in contravention of domestic and international law?

            We know what stops Biden and what would stop Harris: they support the genocide.

            Rather than waving your hands and saying “politics”, why not examine why a president in the party opposite the democrats was able to stop israel almost 45 years ago.

            The democrats of today seem to be to the right of Reagan in this matter.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    28 days ago

    People have been talking about third parties for months, but there’s always an excuse

    • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      27 days ago

      Every election there is some excuse as to why we can not pivot to third parties. To me the bad-faith actors are all these clowns who say oh lets not bring it up til we think its appropriate. Like when is it gonna be appropriate? Some of us were for the likes of Perot and Nader, its been literally 3 decades of people saying hush up third parties. Like at this point, you can only assume these people love the status quo, and they are willing to fight any deviation from it.

  • Aedis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    28 days ago

    Honest question. What do you do for someone who’s sole issue right now is to stop the genocide? There’s only one candidate going for that afaik, and it’s not Harris or Trump.

      • Aedis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        27 days ago

        Jill Stein? Unless I’m wrong. It’s nuanced, but her position is to stop the genocide.

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          You know she has no authority to do anything about it right? She’s only campaigning on this issue because she knows damn well she won’t get elected. This flimsy promise is enough to keep many people locked up from voting for anyone besides her and her baseless savior complex nonsense. All she is doing is siphoning a lot of votes from the one person that will actually be given the authority to change things.