• Chev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Everybody needs to eat stuff. And if it is about reducing pain and having a better climate impact, you should plants all the way. A cow eats 50 times the amount of plants that it gives back in meat.

    • Heydo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fun fact, humans share more DNA with fungi than they do with plants. We share nearly 50% of our DNA with fungi.

      Plus mushrooms are the sex organs of the mycelium organism. Just an extra fun fact for free there.

        • Heydo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          There are theories that hypothesize that mycelium came to earth via asteroids from space.

          So it may be more apt to say that OP eats space dick instead.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s my understanding that fungi came around rather late in the game. Long after animals and plants both.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s assume for a moment that somehow your salad was conscious. That’s an even bigger reason not to eat an animal that has to be fed on plants for a long time.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or maybe its just a fundamental fact of life that something has to die in order for you to live and virtue signaling about the degree to which you participate in that death is a pointless exercise.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ah yes, the old “I accidentally stepped on a fly, might as well exterminate the whole biosphere” defense

        • Ignotum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          “our new cancer drug is 99% effective!”

          “So it doesn’t work in 1% of cases? Then what’s the point, throw it away, we just have to accept that cancer is going to happen”

        • mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          These arguments are exactly why people hate vegans. It’s nonsense.

          Not only do you jump to an insane straw man. You showcase that you ignore a clear increasing contradiction around your world view and choose reactionary nothing.

          If you care about life realize the harder question. If you care about the environment realize clear inefficiencues. Currently, you showcase nothing more than crude thoughtlessness.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’m not a vegan. Their argument was literally that morally there is no difference in the amount of death caused by any person for the purposes of consumption.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This logic doesn’t make sense in any other context. Like, if I say we should try to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere, you could point out that emitting CO2 is a fundamental part of human life, so something something virtue signaling blah blah blah. Just because something is unavoidable to a certain degree doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to minimize it.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Or maybe there’s happy middle where everyone can live comfortably while keeping the harm we cause at a minimum.

        Or, at the most selfish, we could make sure we don’t kill ourselves this decade or the next.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I mean if you stretch the definition enough even cells know they are being eaten. they usually respond by “shit this cant be good, I better press this big red button”

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    There’s no way this won’t restart the same argument with someone, huh? Top-tier shitpost, well done.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    There was a Hungarian cult that convinced others that people can survive by eating light. There were some deaths and was quickly shut down, but they exist forever in anorexia-related jokes.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, that’s what most people don’t understand… People should do some shrooms/LSD to get out of their head and back to their heart.

      This would solve most if not all the cognitive dissonance we strugle with every day…

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Man I was giggling about this a ton of times as it passed by due to the recent admin posting update about all that shit on the deranged vegan sub until just now I realized the comment was from Roge Jogan. Fuck that dumbass and everything he does.