Summary

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich endorsed President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, stating it’s “time” to extend full Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu highlighted his alignment with Trump on the “Iranian threat.”

Tensions in Gaza and Lebanon have escalated following recent Israeli airstrikes, with regional leaders gathering in Riyadh to address Israeli actions.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog is set to meet President Biden, though Biden’s influence on Israel may be limited following Trump’s win.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    Anyone who abstained on grounds of Harris’s position on Gaza in my view have blood on their hands in what will not only assuredly he worse for Palestinians under Trump, but also the ongoing attempted genocide in Ukraine by Putin.

    They may as well be Trump voters to me and I want nothing to do with them.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        I really hated all the moaning about people calling out that both are shitty options. The Overton window is so far to the right. Like, yeah Harris is clearly the better option but neither represent any positive moves forward.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          For Palestine? Probably. In so many other options? It’s laughable that people think that the two candidates were in any way similar.

          Biden, and by extension Harris, have not waved their hands and saved the country (even if they could, which they can’t, because we elected politicians not magicians), but they have done leagues more for people than anything the Trump crowd has.

          Being ignorant of that is dangerous, but spreading that ignorance is borderline manslaughter for all the people who are going to be hurt because millions of people decided not to show up for this election that did for the last.

      • maplebar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Oh both can be true, but in this case they are not.

        There has always been valid reason to give arms to Israel, and there continues to be today. If you think that alone amounts to “supporting genocide” you’re about to be pretty upset when you watch the actual genocide that unfolds in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank over the next 4-8 years. Trump and Netanyahu are about to go scorched earth on Palestine like never in the history of the ~80 year war.

        Bernie fuckin’ Sanders could be POTUS today and he’d still send weapons to Israel, because they are our main ally in the region who also happens to under near-constant threats and attacks from multiple angles. The absolute best we can reasonably ask for is that weapons are sent on a conditional basis, but nobody wants to talk about that reality.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      The Harris campaign made the decision to not break from Biden on Israel, at the cost of a +6 points gain. That’s the fault of the campaign’s calculations to ignore those voters, take them for granted, and instead run to the right with Liz Cheney and having the most lethal Military.

      I voted for Harris and told others to do the same. It’s still on the campaign. Blaming voters is just sowing division when we need unity and solidarity to fight against Fascism.

      Quote

      Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

      Quotes

      In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

      Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      Over 50% of the god damn country voted for a man who has so many major, should-be career ending flaws we don’t even need to list them anymore. If he kicked a puppy it wouldn’t even make the top 10 worst things he’s done. The democrats lost to the stupidest president of all time, a man who’s entire economic policy revolves around tariffs that he fundamentally doesn’t even understand and who cannot seem to open his mouth without lying.

      …and you’re here dunking on the people trying to oppose America’s blatant complicity in genocide. Well, you sure showed them.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        Tbf the 50% that voted for trump aren’t here, plain and simple, so that’s why you don’t see engagement with them.

        The only political engagement you’ll see here on Lemmy shifts overwhelmingly left for all parties, so you’ll see mostly squabbling between various left factions.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        while youre busy opposing genocide, you got someone significantly worse elected instead. Well done.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Why do so many “moderates” insist on acting like the politically engaged people they run into online are the same people who are were so politically disengaged this year that they just didn’t vote?

          Like, could you please explain the thinking that someone wouldn’t vote and then keep spending free time talking about it?

          It’s not just you, and you’re not the first one I asked.

          But everyone else just down votes me for asking and never respond.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Well here’s a comment from someone I was talking to that was politically engaged yet arguing that folks might as well not vote.

            I’m not going into the thinking behind it, but it’s certainly happening.

            Being politically “engaged” on Lemmy doesn’t mean much in terms of ensuring voter participation. I’ve seen plenty of folks with a “democrats have to earn my vote” sentiment. That very much seemed to play out given the much lower voter participation for Democrats this year.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Did you link the wrong comment?

              What you linked is just someone saying they can understand why someone who thinks both party’s won’t help, won’t be likely to vote.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                someone who thinks both party’s won’t help

                I don’t read it this way all - there was no conditional on party efficacy and it in fact was an assertion that their lives won’t change due to who was elected, which changed the overall statement to read like the working class shouldn’t vote.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  So, the issue is you’re not understanding what people are saying…

                  You’re thinking they said something they didn’t and you’re getting upset about nothing.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            Probably for the same reason so many terminally online “politically engaged” people insist that they’re clearly morally and intellectually superior to everyone else despite the fact that all they do is whine about how the “lesser evil” (in just one of thousands of elections, no less) isn’t good enough for them.

            Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              I think you’re confusing me for someone else

              I voted D like I always do, so have most progressive on here from what I’ve seen them say.

              What me, and them, have been saying is that Biden and Harris had our votes, but every indication show d they wouldn’t get enough to beat trump.

              It’s fine to be upset about that, we are too. Probably more than any moderate, we’re literally losing more than you all, that’s why we care.

              But what’s scary is this has all happened before. Moderates refuse to acknowledge they’re unpopular with Dem voters, and rather than reach out to progressives for help reaching non-votera…

              You all just seemed obsessed with turning more Dem voters away from the party.

              Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

              The change we need is better Dem candidates, how the absolute fuck will that happen if we’re not allowed to acknowledge we keep running shitty candidates?

              Do you even remember how a fair and open primary is supposed to work?

              How is one of those ever possible if no one is allowed to criticize the party’s favorite?

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          I really didn’t.

          Edit: meaning I am not American and if I was I would have voted Harris, not that Trump is not significantly worse.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        For some reason they still think they can bully people into voting for their guy. This has been thoroughly disproved but still they persist.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 days ago

      She does, so does Biden, just not to the extent trump will.

      It’s fucked up the DNC insisted on taking support of genocide as a binary topic out of this election.

      Just think, if they cared more about votes than dark money from a foreign government, trump might not be president elect right now. That was always an option you know? Giving Dem voters what they wanted, not just on this issues but multiple others.

      Do you think the gamble was worth it now?

      Are you willing to do anything different in four years?

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Biden and Harris already openly pledge unconditional material support to Israel in its genocide, organize Europe in this same direction, and go after anyone opposing them on this. Israel receives what it materially needs to do all pf this. Any further escalation in the West Bank will be done with materials, funds, and diplomatic cover provided by the Biden-Harris administration.

        Biden and Harris feign empathy and try to run little games around redefining what a ceasefire is for PR purposes. But in terms of the basic reakity of supporting Israel to do whatever it wants to Palestinians, as in providing them the means they would otherwise nit have to do it, there is no sense in which they are less bad than Trump.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Harris did and does support genocide and if you tolerated that you should do some self-criticism.

  • joker125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    LeopardsAteMyFace.

    Unfortunately, this time around, for the Americans pretending to actually give damn on social meda, Gaza will be a parking lot soon.

    Just as Trump proclaimed.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    i hope all those lefties that refused to vote feel really accomplished now.

    congrats, guys! you did it!

    you installed a fascist dictator!

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    To those cowards that didn’t vote: This is on you, own it you sniveling weasels.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        own the cowardice. Dems suck but every non voter has blood on their hands. Ignorance and apathy are not moral principles.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I voted, but I have no power to change the outcome of the election. Only the democrats had this power, the blame lies only with them.

          Genocide lowers turnout. Saying you’re going to appoint republicans to your cabinet lowers turnout. Pledging to shut down the border and build the wall lowers turnout. Means testing all of your campaign promises lowers turnout. Running tough-on-crime campaign ads raises turnout FOR THE REPUBLICANS!

          We’ve been yelling that the dems will lose if they continue to go right for the last 4 years, but the dems either chose to move to the right on every issue either knowing it would lower their performance, or ignorant because blue maga like you helped shield them from the reality unfolding infront of all of us. I don’t know which is more damning.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I agree the campaign was poor. I agree the party had small, terrible, and stupid ideas. I agree that chasing republicans is stupid.

            I will still however yell at cowards who coddle people who think not voting is anything but moral cowardice. Just own it. Take some fucking accountability. Its fine to have issues and complaints, its suicide to encourage people to go full karen.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Blaming the people for the predictable effects of the dem’s actions deflects away from only entity that had the power to change the outcome and the only entity that will have the power to change this in 2026.

              It’s not constructive to go “Damn, I sure wish genocide didn’t decrease turnout for the dems”

              Just like in 2016, the dems deluded themselves into blaming the voters (specifically black people and/or the left) and bernie sanders instead of themselves, and we are watching them do it again in real time.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                I would argue democrat donors preferred a trump win and preferred dem turnout be low because they had a decent campaign for a second and shut it down.

                What your saying only makes sense if you operate from the idea dems want to win and not that they want to hand a victory their donors.

                In 2016 actual democrat operative tried to twistpeople’s arms to vote. This election that energy did not come from the mainstream democrats. Their pitch was “we don’t need you, we want republicans instead”.

                The calculus is different when you recognize both parties hate you.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Absolutely why should death and destruction be only there. Let also the exporter get a taste of their own product.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wait, why would it make any difference if Donald is elected?

    I thought everyone was saying that Biden and Harris were doing nothing about the Palestinians.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I mean, they aren’t wrong, are they?

    Hamas is all but defeated, Hezbollah is also on their back foot, and even the model caliphate, Iran, has proven to be almost completely ineffective against Israel’s defense system. Europe will make empty gestures about war crimes via the toothless ICC, and America is now totally controlled by the Republicans who never wanted a two-state peace process in the first place.

    Israel has never in their short history had a better opportunity to go for the power play and deal with the Palestinians however they please, and under Trump we can expect that they won’t get even a little bit of push back from the US, regardless of how harsh and violently they want to play it.

    I expect a fucking bloodbath and a full annexation of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and possibly parts of southern Lebanon.

    But hey, the American people have spoken, and I guess that’s what they wanted.

  • small44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Israel is already controlling the West bank directly with settlements and indirectly with the Palestinians authority who arrest resistance leaders but do nothing to defend Palestinians

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    And notice how all the screeching about genocide has gone silent? Proves that they never actually cared.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Brought to you in part by the voters too stupid to see the WWarmongering and accelerated genocide and the others who think it’s a good thing, prophecy, or that billions won’t die because idiot bullies have the bombs.

    We appreciate that you come together in support of the War even with having to plan your intertwined economy failing and dragging down others, dollar replaced, rights removals, and climate fails. /s

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      The genocide is already accelerated. The Biden-Harris administration already gives Israel all of the material, military, and diplomatic support they need for genociding Gaza and ramping up against the West Bank, the latter being something that has already been happening for months. And people like yourself tolerated that, accepted that from “your” candidates, and fought against those for whom it was correctly a red line.

      In short, both Biden and Harris would rather lose than be anything other than 100% materially supportive of Israel’s genocide. They made that choice and y’all backed them up on it. Time to own those decisions, the decision to lose in support of genocide, and do some self-criticism around how what you subscribed to was actually neither particularly strategic nor morally sound.