Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I’m not upset Bernie was criticized - no one should be above a good-faith critique and ideas should be judged on merit as opposed to who says them. The reason I disagree with Pelosi is that I think Sanders made some damn good points, and if the Dems don’t listen they are going to fail again.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      10 days ago

      The reason I disagree with Pelosi is that I think Sanders made some damn good points, and if the Dems don’t listen they are going to fail again.

      They would rather fail than listen.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think the biggest issue was actually with messaging. Democrats were still pretty much relying on MSM which almost no young people watch.

      I think that beyond what Sanders says what left needs are young people, true populists (as opposed to pseudopopulists ones like MAGA has) with progressive messages.

      https://runforsomething.net/

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Honestly I think this is huge. I’m nowhere as old as these dinosaurs but even I’m surprised that people get “news” and info from podcasts and such. Mainly because any old jackass could prattle on about whatever without a single lick of knowledge but…

        That appears to be the case though.

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          any old jackass could prattle on about whatever without a single lick of knowledge

          Welcome to rural talk radio.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Based on his remarks, I won’t be shocked if he’s working on organizing a whole new political party that’s going to eventually supplant the Democratic Party altogether.

      And if that’s what he’s doing, and he pulls it off, it’ll be a good thing, and I’ll probably register a political affiliation other than “no party/unaffiliated” for the first time in about 14 years.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        I won’t be shocked if he’s working on organizing a whole new political party that’s going to eventually supplant the Democratic Party altogether.

        I don’t know how such a thing could ever happen, but I never thought where we are today could happen, so what do I know?

        • Orbituary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Copium and sour grapes help wash it down. I was highly let down but not the least bit surprised by the outcome. I am trying to get people accept that the Dems need reform if we’re going to continue with a two party system.

          Unfortunately, the Pelosis and Schumers are going to continue to shove milquetoast and false hope down our throat while continuing to move to the right to try and grab the republican demographic.

          Meanwhile, the rest of us just want food, education, housing, and a way to retire before we’re 90.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      These Conservative Democrats are so uninspiring that we’d allow Nazi level fascists to take over.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        If this is the political reality, then it’s the political reality that must be adapted to.

        Centrists would rather lose.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Conservative democrats are republicans. The dems made their tent so big that it has lost all meaning. I dont recall dem politicians ever going to the right of repubilcans in the past. It would have seemed impossible. Biden/Harris normalized it.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Pelosi’s attitude is a big reason why

    She believes voters work for her and need to do what she wants or she scolds them, afterwards they’ll listen.

    Bernie believes the best way to get elected is to show voters you’ll help them.

    One method is very effective, it’s just foreign governments, billionaires, and corporations pay a lot of money to make sure candidates like that never make it out of a primary.

    If an elected official put the average voter first, where does that leave the wealthy?

    Not first? Completely unacceptable, Thurston get my mink we’re leaving.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    The Pelosi interview is honestly batshit insane. She doesn’t see the election as a rejection of the party, thinks the Democrats are doing well, Kamala Harris did everything right, Sanders is wrong, and then she made some backhanded comments about how Biden should have dropped out earlier. I know some of that is spin she that she has to say, but it’s still deeply out of touch.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Kamala Harris did everything right

      She presented her message of ‘vote for me to keep things the same’ flawlessly. Unfortunately, people who live paycheck to paycheck don’t want things to stay the same.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 days ago

        They’re looking forward to wishing they were able to live paycheck to paycheck…

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 days ago

          Lord knows you’re looking forward to watching people suffer just so you can lecture harder.

          Scolding voters into voting for someone who represents no deviation from an untenable status quo has failed, very publicly, twice. It doesn’t matter how bad the opponent is. This strategy is shit. Stop using it. Learn, damn you all. Learn.

          I voted for Harris.

          • teamevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Me too and I wasn’t saying that I’m looking forward to it…I’m saying the economics are going to be horrible and we’re going to long to these times back.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah, if Trump pulls the stuff he said he’d pull (Tariffs and mass deportations), then the supply of goods inside the country will fall drastically, resulting in stronger inflation. Which will then result in consumption of anything nonessential to collapse. This will lead to increasing unemployment.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        She presented her message of ‘vote for me to keep things the same’ flawlessly. Unfortunately, people who live paycheck to paycheck don’t want things to stay the same.

        Nope. Her plan was “I am going to lower taxes on the middle class and provide additional help n these specific ways”. But she presented that plan in a very flawed way.

        That you were not aware of her actual message is partly your fault and partly her fault.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It’s not… I was aware of her 82 page economic plan. How come you weren’t aware of it? It’s your fault that you weren’t aware of her economic plan while people like me were aware of it. If I did you then you could have done it.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Pelosi is the best example of what’s wrong with Dems. Literally enriched herself off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      10 days ago

      Pelosi is wrong about Sanders. But she did not “enrich herself”.

      Bernie is literally quoted in the article saying “Nancy is a friend of mine”.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        10 days ago

        The main thing she’s known for is rampant unabashed insider trading. If that isn’t enriching herself then I don’t know what is.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 days ago

        Pelosi is wrong about Sanders. But she did not “enrich herself”.

        Are we playing the “it’s her spouse who is the stock investor” game?

        https://www.newsweek.com/how-nancy-pelosi-net-worth-vastly-increased-while-house-speaker-1762361

        Because if this is how one accumulates wealth, it certainly sounds like it’s “off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.”

        D.C.-based nonprofit OpenSecrets.org estimated Pelosi’s net worth at $115 million in 2020, a rise of $41 million since 2004 - the first year OpenSecrets began tracking members’ personal finances.

        Paul Pelosi’s company, Financial Leasing Services, has been highly successful in its investments in recent years and those investments have included shares in major firms such as Disney, Amazon and Google.

        The New York Post estimated that the Pelosis had made between $5.6 million and $30.4 million between 2007 and 2020 through capital gains and dividends from investments in five tech companies - Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft - based on public disclosures.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s not really good evidence. They could’ve made more money by just holding an SP 500 index fund. Their recent Visa trade is better evidence.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Fair! But personally it’s my opinion that in all but a vanishingly small number of cases, if someone is sitting on high tens of millions of dollars and on up, I feel very certain that fundamentally this description works:

            Literally enriched herself off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.

            While there are people who are underpaid and struggling to eat, there’s not a path to that kind of wealth that isn’t directly or indirectly exploiting their pain and suffering.

            Their wealth is itself the evidence.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    “do you really think that the Democratic party is going to the mat… and fighting for you?”

    Forget about me, or the working class, the Democratic party doesn’t actually fight for anything.

    2000 election stolen in Florida? Ho hum, oh well… we’ll get 'em next time! (2004 election stolen in Ohio…)

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/29/uselections2000.usa

    https://www.wired.com/2008/03/the-mysterious/

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republican-it-guru-dies-in-plane-crash/

    You rightly nominated a Supreme Court Justice but the Senate refuses to give them a hearing? Oh well! Guess we’ll just have to win the 2016 election…

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merrick_Garland_Supreme_Court_nomination

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    Unfortunately his whole political career has been the democrats telling him he’s wrong as they continually shoot themselves in their collective dick.

    I, for one, will be writing in his name, voting third party or not at all until they give me a genuinely progressive candidate. Until then, fuck them, and fuck this country.

    • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      One of the biggest things about being a leftist is being right about stuff before it’s considered polite.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 days ago

      What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Having the numbers isn’t enough, there needs to be organization. A group of 8% of the electorate that votes in lockstep could affect policy pretty fundamentally, more than any amount of money could.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

        Yes. But it can be any group of voters. Could be a ‘tea party on the left’.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Aren’t organization and group synonymous?

          And of course, this is assuming that Trump isn’t going to establish himself as a dictator. Of course, the thing is Trump is too old to be dictator. And the people around him don’t seem to be the most competent, either. So I sort of don’t know what’s going to happen. In any case, I’m glad that I don’t live in the US, thought authoritarianism is advancing globally.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Now, imagine this sentiment among thousands of people, across multiple states. That’s how you lose an election.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Lmao buddy. Ignoring the people to the left is how you literally just lost an election

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Sorry, but losing strategies deserve to lose. Im tired of voting for someone because they’re slightly less bought and paid for.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          The best reason to vote for Harris was because she was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations like Biden did also. Why would you NOT do that?

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      Unfortunately his whole political career has been the democrats telling him he’s wrong

      Nope. Neither Biden nor Harris never once told Bernie he is “wrong”.

  • JBar2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    The Republicans are doing zero for the working class other than lying to them and giving their money yo billionaires.

    Dems supported unions where Trump impugned them

    Dems forgave student loans, Republicans went to court to stop it

    Dems pushed to end noncompetes for the average worker, Republicans went to court to stop it

    Dems passed the CHIPS act to bring good paying jobs to multiple communities

    Dems passed an infrastructure bill while Trump had 100 infrastructure weeks that accomplished nothing

    Trump said he’d fire workers rather than pay them overtime

    Harris promised to investigate price gouging, Trump is supported by the oligarchy

    Etc, etc

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Which indicates that policy is secondary to messaging. On every substantive policy metric, Democrats are better than Republicans. People even say they prefer Democratic policies over Republicans’ when polled, by wide margins. So it must be the messenger and the way the message is being conveyed that is losing elections. That’s not to say that policies don’t matter, they absolutely do, but if you’ve got great policies and shit messaging, then you’re not going to win voters over, no matter how much better you are.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I forgot which comedian did this bit during their standup but their point was that progressives/liberals/leftists suck at messaging or sloganeering. Their goals are noble but there are no catchy slogans to go with it.

        Just think about it. “They’re killing the babies!” is way more catchy and effective than “Access to abortion should be available to everyone. Even if you want to have a child, some complications or health issues may require you to abort the pregnancy as early as you can.” Yeah that’s not reaching everyone, is it? And you can’t scream it like “They’re killing the babies!”

        And that’s just an example of policy that was chosen by few states’, which they also voted for GOP, giving them power to ban abortion on federal level. (In case you are wondering which states: Arizona, Missouri, Montana, Nevada)

        If you can’t communicate how you can give the people what they want, how do you even counter “Democrats hate America!” or stuff like that?

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Pelosi is wrong. But she is not the owner of the DNC. The DNC is controlled by delegates elected by primary voters. The DNC is not a person or monolithic entity.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        The DNC is controlled by delegates elected by primary voters.

        I’m afraid thats not entirely true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

        Also, party leadership constantly changes the rules to suit the election cycle. They are a private entity and can run primaries however they want. In the DNC vs Sanders case, they successfully argued that they can elect canddates in a smoke filled back room if they so chose, and had no legal duty to fairness or in representing the will of the voters whatsoever.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m afraid thats not entirely true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

          It is entirely true. No superdelegate can vote in the initial primary vote.

          They are a private entity and can run primaries however they want.

          Subject to the DNC charter. They are bound by the DNC charter in the same way that the government is bound by the Constitution.

          they successfully argued that they can elect canddates in a smoke filled back room if they so chose

          They argued they could change the DNC charter, which it technically true. The USA how the power to change its Constituion, but it is still bound by it.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It is entirely true. No superdelegate can vote in the initial primary vote.

            they change that rule as needed every election.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Honestly call or email the Democratic party

    Do it because it will be cathartic, but don’t do it expecting them to listen. Progressives need a new tack if we’re actually going to save humanity from ourselves. (Spoiler, we probably won’t)

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Pelosi’s response kinda proves that the DNC is just the other side of the shit coin running the funhouse arcade game of American democracy

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Pelosi should just gtfo and become a stock broker. She’s unusually good at trading stocks for some obscure reason.

    (The reason is insider trading)

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Will be writing my reps later today and I sent a few bucks to Bernie since I figure what better way to tell a politician they’re barking up the right tree?

    I know online petitions are generally cringe but if there was one backing up Bernie’s stance here and telling the Dems to get their heads out of their own asses, I’d sign it in a heartbeat. If other people feel similarly, maybe we should get the ball rolling? Best case Dems get the message, worst case we waste our time and nothing changes, right?