• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I might not leave the country, but I’ll have to leave my state. I wonder if next Friday after work I’ll need to load up everything I can fit in my car and drive as far north as possible. It’s terrifying that my rights as a transgender human vanish will vanish overnight where I live. I’ve heard of bounties in Odessa.

    Knowing that most of the people I live and work around are happily voting for a child rapist has broken my brain. The folks protesting at the Planned Parenthood (abortion is already illegal here) are going to vote for a man that’s probably paid for multiple abortions. It’s a sickness I can’t fathom.

    • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      Its sickening what is happening to this country, that you even feel the need to flee in such a way, but it is a realistic concern. There are people who very much want carte blanche to harm trans people, and if Trump is elected they may get that cover, its vile.

    • gi1242@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      fully agree. hope you don’t have to move… but for some miraculous incomprehensible reason the race is a statistical tie

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    With a more representative electoral system, we could have more then two buttons. First-past-the-post voting is mathematically flawed and will always result in a two party system, which is why we must replace it as soon as we can.

    Yall believe in democracy right?

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          That has nothing to do with this. That’s the interstate popular vote compact and all it does is make the winner of the popular vote the winner of the election. It does absolutely nothing to end two party dominance, and continues all of the exact same flaws of the existing system but without the electoral college, and even that only in the unlikely event that the compact survives the inevitable challenge in the supreme court. You still only get one vote for one candidate and it comes necessarily at the expense of any others.

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            You’re right I spose, but It’s the first step. Every time the ec elected a Republican in the last 25 years, a dem won the popular vote.

            Once Dems actually start winning, Then you have the ability to make changes. There are already states that have implemented ranked choice voting.

            • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              I mean, winning isn’t the last step. The democrats are more likely to implement anything meaningful than the republicans, but we’re still going to have to drag them kicking and screaming into doing it. If everyone breathes a sigh of relief and relaxes on November 7th nothing will change. The real work STARTS then.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I don’t understand how there are undecided voters this election… I understand trump voters. Ride or die republicans, bigots, wealthy people that want more money for themselves. They are fucked up, but they make sense.

      But how are you undecided? What are you weighing up. If you’re not in the aforementioned groups, what single positive thing does trump offer?

      • stochasticity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 days ago

        I’ve seen some people try the free speech angle. But that isn’t true either. Neither he nor Elon are actually about free speech.

        • Karjalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          21 days ago

          No, they’re inherently more anti free speech than the people they’re puroportedly against, anyone using that justification is either ignorant or only cares about not getting in trouble for being a bigot

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Right? How can that be said with a straight face with all these “woke” book bans. And then Trump saying he wants to arrest the media for saying bad things about him.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        Undecided voters aren’t undecided because they’re oblivious to what’s going on. They’re undecided because they live in a swing state, so they have more power than the average voter, and most importantly they want something. They see the candidates campaigning specifically for them. They’re hoping to be offered a promise they actually care about.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        The only reason I can actually understand an undecided voter is if it’s actually a strategic decision to entice the parties to give them more. An undecided voter is worth so much that Elon is literally giving away millions of dollars to sway them. Yeah it’s chump change to him but it’s still unprecedented. It would be kind of like a nullifying jurur, in that they’re saying something completely different than what they’re thinking. That totally gives undecided voters way more credit than they’re actually due, because in reality they’re just ignorant of the situation.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        My guess is the Palestinian issue which puts people on the fence. Both parties would still support the Israeli government.

        • slampisko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Both parties would still support the Israeli government.

          Exactly, and Trump is so much worse in everything else, not to mention that he’d also be worse in the very Palestinian issue you’re concerned about! Even with this issue in the equation I still don’t understand it

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Well, I’m not American so I cannot feel the existential dilemma between picking a genocider or ride or die genocider. But if I am electing, I certainly don’t want to feel being forced to pick either two. I imagine many Americans probably feel uncomfortable with that as well.

            Additionally, another factor with Trump still polling remarkably well is because a lot of people perceive the economy under Trump to be better. Take it as you will, but people under economic pressure feel forced to pick the extreme. People typically value economic security over liberty, unfortunately.

            • slampisko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              Yeah, the ingrained illusion that Republicans are better for the economy is a very unfortunate one

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      in the states it’s so easy. you just choose between the status quo or the obvious deranged evil. here we vote on the lower positions and nobody ever knows who any of them are and we don’t have proportional so everyone just votes by party and the names are largely meaningless

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    My Mexican immigrant coworker believes that if Kamala gets elected that immigrants will be deported but also immigrants are getting too much free money and food stamps and things like that. He really has bought into some kind of weird belief that Donald Trump is a better candidate. He can’t vote because he’s not a citizen. I think he’s just pissed off because he works two jobs and sees people who get free stuff and don’t come here legally as lazy.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      20 days ago

      Trying to combine immigrants in your first sentence is so disingenuous. Here’s what makes it clear:

      Legal Immigrants are different than illegal immigrants. Of course your coworker is pissed off that he’s come here legally and is not getting rewarded for it. Whether the ones who come illegally are lazy or not doesn’t make a difference. They shouldn’t be given anything we currently give them. We have veterans dying in the streets getting nothing. Everyone should be mad about it.

      • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        What you’re saying is not precisely true. To register for food stamps, well, you need to be registered. Likewise for other forms of welfare.

        Illegal immigrants are not coming to this country and living off of welfare. That is not happening.

        But even if it was, are you seriously going to tell me that the solution to that is to kick those immigrants out? To round them up in camps? That’s not going to help homeless veterans.

        People like you will either believe in stupid arguments or talk in bad faith, and then not actually support welfare or UBI at all.

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          20 days ago

          Illegal immigrants aren’t getting money and services through our usual welfare program, but nice try implying that’s what we’re claiming.

          And yes, kick out the ones here illegally. Not sure where you’re getting camps from, just move them out. Then we need to redirect sources to Americans that need it and we need to make sure those are being spent properly and not disappearing into bureaucratic pockets.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 days ago

            You do realize how just morally corrupt and insane that logic is right? We spend trillions as a country, you’re upset that immigrants might get something when our veterans program is still lacking. You are fighting over crumbs and upset at other crumb eaters instead of the elite being the ones only giving out crumbs. There are valid arguments and suggested tactics to help BOOST the economy with programs that can help veterans, immigrants, and includes social safety nets for all people. The distraction that “They’re Stealing Your Crumbs!tm” helps stop any progress and keeps the boogeyman so voters can be scared into submission.

            We need immigrants to help a flailing economy thanks to the baby boomer population (immigrants help us economically!, it’s a statistical fact!). Immigrants also have lower crime rates than typical groups of people born here. Housing the homeless is cheaper than arresting them, ER visits (because no preemptive healthcare) are most expensive, ETC ETC. All the fear mongering is just lies, don’t believe the hatred and look into it yourself so you’re not spreading misinformation.

            https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/undocumented-immigrant-offending-rate-lower-us-born-citizen-rate

            https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/how-does-immigration-affect-us-economy

            https://www.globalgiving.org/learn/how-much-would-it-cost-to-end-homelessness-in-america/

            I just love how the political discourse went from “should we have healthcare for all? (circa 2016)”, to “they took our jobs! (circa southpark 2004)”.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 days ago

      The electoral college picks the president. Not you. You’re a “migrant” labeled “citizen”. You can influence the election if you happen to walk by an actual elector and get a chance to talk to him… Tell him about your student loans, your fear of putin, the homeless, you two jobs just to pay the mortgage, etc. they’ll understand and vote the way you would vote if you were an actual elector… don’t you worry migrant!

      Yey! Democracy!

  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    20 days ago

    A perfectly good meme but I would say it might still presume a little too much good faith.

    They’re not undecided. They want to vote for Trump and are desperately hoping for a socially acceptable reason to do so.

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    I’m going to go out on a pretty long limb here and suggest the possibly that they’re not actually undecided at all.

    • ManixT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      It shouldn’t be, but I feel like this is such a delicate thing.

      Like, Trump is obviously racist, but his base sees themselves in him and when he is labeled racist, it projects to them; they’re labeled racist too. They “know” they aren’t racist and it’s a strong accusatory word along the lines of being called a pedophile and that instantly brings up defenses and basically kills any chance of swaying their opinion. Besides, if we were wrong calling “them” (their projection from trump) racist, how could we possibly be right about calling Trump racist?

      Should we give a shit what these people think? Really wish we didn’t have to, but the world isn’t fair and just enough at the moment to disregard the nuance here.

  • multifariace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    Apparently putting a huge number of people in jail for minor possession of a drug that is only illegal because of racist 70s politics is spotless, and doing so to support capitalizing the prison system, is spotless. I call it dehumanizing and unconstitutional, but I just care about empirical data that apparently is completely unimportant in tribalist capitalist worshiping countries like the USA.

    • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I don’t count “spotless prosecutorial record” as a win, but given the two viable choices I’ll take it over “shockingly successful fascist demagogue” every time, and twice on Sundays.

      • chaonaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 days ago

        I holding my finger over the button as long as possible in the hope that the button that the “spotless prosecutorial record” will suddenly add the “stop abetting a genocide” portion we’ve been asking for since before they changed out the previous button, but I guess I’ll be going for the option that isn’t currently telling me how my existence is threatening to them and hope that they’ll follow through on valuing human life this time around.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Countless was a little under 2000 people (at least as far as Harris is concerned) That’s about half of what her predecessor in the same office did over roughly the same time period.

      Now, that conviction is for “possession, sale, or cultivation”. Most paid a fine rather than serve jail time. We also don’t know the exact breakdown of possession vs sale vs cultivation.

      We also know that Harris pushed for decriminalization and legalization in California, and has pushed some of the same as vice president. I think Joe is the roadblock there, even if he was convinced to pardon a bunch of people for simple possession.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Naw there’s just a bunch of people who won’t admit they’re voting for Trump when you ask them. They also don’t want their friends/community thinking they’re voting for a Democrat either so they just lie and say they’re undecided or even more likely Independent™ because that sounds cool anyway. They know they’re voting for a fascist but also want to have their cake too and not publicly admit it.

      They may not even want the fascist part. But they’re voting for Trump because they think one day they’ll make over $500k/yr and they don’t want to pay “200% more taxes” (it’s actually 2%) when that day inevitably comes. The rest of them secretly would rather kill their children than let a black woman run our country, but they’d never say it.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Statistically, that’s just not true. Just look at the differences from the polls, the margin between Harris and Trump has moved quite some percentage points back and forth. E.g. after RFKs endorsement, more undecided voters went to Trump and after the debate, more went back to Harris.

      • gi1242@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        actually, i think they know they will never make 500k a year. they are voting for trump because he hates they people they do, and he validates their racist behavior.

        they also believe some of the lies he sprouts about immigrants stealing their jobs and being a drain on the system.

    • gi1242@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      sadly yes. there are people who are still on the fence. given that 70million people will look the other way and vote for him despite the lies, dementia, racism, Facism, Nazism, narcissism, sexism, felonies, fraud, racketeering, sexual harassment, etc. I’m not surprised a few million are on the fence.