• Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

    To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.

    Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground

    Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.

    • valek879@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Also there is evidence that it is harmful to cis people. Especially cis women who might be queer or straight or gender nonconforming or not. These fuckwads always forget trans men exist and just harass women more with this shit. They don’t give a fuck off you’re trans or not, it’s about control. And their especially interested in controlling women.

      It’s also directly tied to fascism. Eco points to Machismo in point 12 of Ur-Fascism. “[Fascists hold] both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” Meaning it’s not just women, trans women, gay men, people outside of traditional 1940s gender roles, but it also includes straight, cis men who just don’t seem to be straight and cis enough.

  • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

    You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

    We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.

    I love each and every one of you.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        23 days ago

        Pssshhhhh!!! Look at this bourgeoisie mother fucker over here, refusing to share their stall with others!

        Selfish. Yes, that’s the word!

        The common working man poops on the left half of the toilet, and a stranger from the streets poop on the right half! AND THEY BOTH HATE THE YANKEES!!!

        Because fuck the Yankees. Can’t believe I have to cheer for the god damn Dodgers …

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’ve done things like this when people do the ‘trans women make “real” women feel uncomfortable in locker rooms’ argument.

      “So you’re saying women would be more comfortable with that guy changing next to them?”

      They don’t really have an argument against that part.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      22 days ago

      Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they’re in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone’s manager.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, told the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 days ago

    Cool, they got a useless law to “protect” children. Where is the law that protects them in churches/camps/etc?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      Why would they do that? These laws are there to convince ma and pa dipshit that child predators are trans people not a group that’s not open or openly or formally organized and consists of people in all strata of society. In short these laws are to protect the pedos in power from suspicion

  • _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 days ago

    Step 1: Identify as cat

    Step 2: Turn yourself in

    Step 3: Claim 10,000 bucks

    Step 4: No crime was committed, goto 1

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    A bounty on trans people? So I get paid by the state to catch 'em and turn 'em in so they can be issued their ‘up to $500 fine’? How cost ineffective.

    Ah, it’s misinformation and done so poorly, in an attempt to dramatise, they used the wrong word.

    So, the $10,000 is actually for lawsuits and can start there if anyone found guilty of the crime had also caused damages. That’s very normal for laws of people being somewhere they’ve been told not to be and damaging stuff. Like if I break the toilet seat I’m standing on while peering over the top of the cubicle to watch you pee.

    It’s articles like this that do not help a cause at all.

    It can only be assumed this works in favour of anyone on that 5-2 vote that doesn’t like trans people. If that’s the case then it should be attacking gender identity issues for bathroom use, not trespass laws started in 1989 using binaries. (Yes, in an effort to get the actual information, I read other actual news articles)

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      The 10k is the statuatory minimum and its paid from the person just trying to take a piss to the psychopath policing who can piss where who was not in any way damaged. It is not at all normal to pay random people out of the pockets of those breaking the law.

      In this case it encourages bigots to attack trans people trying to pee by allowing them to legally rob them if they catch them.

      Worse it encourages such attacks whichever bathroom they use. Dress like a girl use the womans room get attacked for using the wrong bathroom, use the mens room get attacked for being a woman in the means room.

      Using the bounty as a method of enforcement exists because the law is deemed likely unlawful. It exists explicitly to stop a pre emptive lawsuit against the government to stop enforcement.