A reverse image search shows this picture posted on several tweets in the last month. Safe to say, this guy made up a story and probably doesn’t have a wife.
He just wanted a “let’s make a woman look stupid” story
Those women right guys? Always going to yoga and crashing cars!
fucking boomers
At a glance thought it was one of those raising nylons but this is way more impressive.
She thought she was on GTA6
Remember, when you hear a crunch of your car hitting something just double down and add more throttle. Only a pussy would stop and asses the situation.
Apparently with automatic cars people can sometimes confuse the accelerator with the break? Maybe this is one of those cases…
Or confuse the break with the brake
Thankfully the only injuries were to grammar nazis
Looks like they backed over it, laying the pole down, then drove forward, poking the pole through the undercarriage and standing it back up.
Oh good eye, I think you’re right especially from the paint on the bumper
Thank you for posting this. Until I read your summary, I thought it was a yoga mat that had somehow escaped from inside the trunk and was completely flummoxed.
I believe you are right except I don’t think the pole moved at all. The ground seems in disturbed. And typically they are made to withstand being hit by a car. So more likely they backed up so fast that it sent the rear up on top of the pole and then just came crashing down on it.
Yup. That’s the only way this could have worked. Unless the car was jumped off a ramp first, Knight Rider style.
As @qooqie pointed out, the paint transfer on the bumper supports your theory.
No, that bollard didn’t budge. She backed into it fast enough to shoot the SUV straight up the bollard, it clears the bumper, and BAM! — the SUV dropped down on the bollard. That bumper should have crumpled, but it was rugged and rounded enough to deflect the impact downward or, equal and opposite reaction, send the vehicle upward. Traffic bollards are still tough enough to stand up to SUVs, but not tall enough to be seen by the drivers.
Oooh, I like your answer better.
How fast was she supposed to be to jump up at least a meter, come to a dead stop, drop down… but have no more than a scratch on the impact zone?
My guess is it wasn’t speed. It’s probably an all-wheel drive car and the front wheels are really close to the front.
So a stubborn driver could tap the bollard, get mad their car stopped, then after contact hit the gas hard and ride up the bollard while still keeping traction on the front wheels because they’re never pushed off the ground. The bumper would take less damage because after the first push most of the motion is upward.
How does it ride up the bollard when we assume the bollard does not budge?
Seriously, you can even see the damage on the bollard, it is clear that it got bend down.
Concrete doesn’t bend.
Where did you find the specification of this one specific bollard and where is the furnace that it is supposed to protect? If there is nothing to protect, why should it be up to the same standard?
We can see that it is damaged, there is really no need to discuss it. It did not bend concrete but the steel tube. The concrete just snaps, it can’t handle bending. It is just in there to prevent collapsing of the tube, so compression, which concrete can do really well.
There is also no other way for this to happen other than the bollard bending or a crane etc. dropping the car.
Sunken ones are the same and given such a dumb statement you clearly know you’re wrong now but won’t admit it.
The concrete is not there to prevent the tube from collapsing. You have that completely backwards.
It’s clearly not bent. Get your eyes checked.
First, I didn’t say it came to a dead stop before it dropped. I think the impalement killed its momentum. Second, fast probably wasn’t the right word, but she hit the gas hard enough to climb that bollard. I was thinking she just plowed into it, but she might’ve backed into it slowly, got stopped, didn’t know why, then pressed down harder on the gas. That would explain the minimal impact.
backed into it slowly, got stopped, didn’t know why, then pressed down harder on the gas
yeah, this is probably what happened
This is the right answer. Bollards made of concrete and steel are designed to stop cars. There is no elasticity in that bollard. If she bent it, it would’ve stayed bent.
First time I’ve seen somebody need to jack off a car.
Probably an a.i. picture. Why do people lie like this. 🙄
I did something similar one time. I was maneuvering around a cleared lot in a work truck and I drove over a tree trunk that was hidden by tall grass. The bumper slid up over the stump and then dropped down on the other side, trapping the truck. Had a hell of a time getting the truck jacked up high enough to get it back over.
For her new car the husband suggested a vintage Pinto.
Well matter is mostly made of empty space
What did she do like drive up it until it pierced the car?
Assuming this isn’t AI gen or Photoshop, probably backed up, reached the bollard, kept reversing forcing the car to go up because it can’t go back, eventually got car over, bollard pierces car bottom as the car frame gets past and it’s weight forces it down.
Stupidity in short, maybe intentional. I don’t believe the story. I don’t know if I even believe the photo.
Either AI has gotten better, the person who photoshopped it was really dedicated, or based on the dent and paint transfer on the back the person backed up fast and rode the post up then dropped down on top of it.
A different person posted that they found this image(reverse search) attached to a number of tweets this month. So the caption is 100% fake
Looking at the bottom corner of the bumper, I definitely think this is the case
