• FardyCakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Am I the only one that is seeing this as a joke referencing Stalactites and Stalagmites? Like I also think that it fits as a good thought experiment, but is the joke so obvious that no one is stating it? Or is am I just reading something into it that’s not there?

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Star Wars is 100% a Space Fantasy. A boy goes on an adventure accompanied by a wizard to save a princess and become a knight.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always liked the distinction (I forget who originated it) that science fiction is a story set in a world where the rules are defined by physics and fantasy is a story set in a world where the rules are defined by the author.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because in the classical Jungian style of analysis, imagery of the basement of a childhood home was a revisiting of the past.

      Likewise “up from the floor” indicates ancients coming up from caves, ancient monsters to be slain, underground dungeons. The primitive unchained and revisited.

      …and using Freud’s principle of the inversion; down from the ceiling is indicative of from the future.

      Prometheanism, featuring stories of Science only taking us so far before we fall from the ceiling, or rather it chaotically falls on us.

      The idea that a return to primative barbarism and violence can also come from above, from technology, from the future unknown, from advanced beings, complex plans, or outter space.

      So whether it’s up from the floor (ancient past) or down from the ceiling (unknown future) - it’s coming for us, with risks and dangers we’re not ready for…

      …or so the stories go.

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would argue that science fiction and fantasy are the same thing and the only difference is the explanation for how all the cool stuff works.

    Functionally, there’s no real difference between a portal that takes the characters to another world using a wormhole and one that does it through through magic. Just like how there’s no difference between Vulcans/Klingons/Wookies and Elves/Dwarves/Beastmen. Both are intelligent non-humans.

  • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Enders Game instilled the importance of adjusting your frame of reference. What was up can become down.

    So it’s science fiction but when you consider a collaborative global human response to existential danger it’s fantasy.

    But the Shadow series shows how quickly we go back to weaponizing and using gifted war trained children as tools of conquest… so realism/horror?

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Orson Scott Card actually weighed in on a simple way to determine if something is fantasy or sci-fi since he writes both:

      The difference between science fiction and fantasy…is simply this, science fiction has rivets, fantasy has trees.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    What was it again in science fiction, hard and soft? Whereas hard is more realistic and soft has more fantasy.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Science fiction is used to look down upon society and is often pessimistic. Fantasy look ls up at what could be and is generally optimistic.