Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserted that no world leader has the right to negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin on behalf of Ukraine.

Speaking to Le Parisien readers, Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine alone determines its future and any dialogue with Russia must follow a peace plan based on strength and international support.

He warned against negotiating without clear guarantees of security, highlighting the risks of Putin resuming aggression after a ceasefire.

Zelenskyy called for a strategy ensuring Ukraine’s long-term stability and security, beyond NATO or EU membership timelines.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 年前

      Tbh a lot of people in the states are under the impression that we CAN do precisely that, because we absolutely have done in the past. But this is also kind of a whole different ballgame, in a ton of pretty crucial ways.

      • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 年前

        this is why our teachers taught us the difference between can and may (one implies ability, the other permission) because all of south america is looking at this like “fucking right dude”

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 年前

        Not only that, but we’re giving fucking BILLIONS of money to Ukraine, we SHOULD have a say so in what happens…

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          No we’re literally not. We’re giving them our stocks of older equipment that has been in warehouses. That equipment is assigned a dollar value and then it’s argued over as if were stacks of cash.

          Yes we’re giving them money too, but when a headline says Biden authorizes $20 billion in additional aid to Ukraine, the vast majority of it is our old stuff.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      Of course no one can negotiate on behalf of Ukraine. Ukraine is holding on thanks to the support of several parties, and those parties do have the right to continue or end that support depending on the conditions they see. I hope this never happens, but If the US says they’re okay with letting Russia keep the territory its gained as long as hostilities end, then they are within their rights to withhold further arms aid on those conditions. Is that the US negotiating as if they are themselves Ukraine? No. Zelensky understands that he is existentially dependent on others. He’s just reminding them not to abuse that.

  • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    I am so sad by how Ukraine has been handled.

    The West should have been an overwhelming power against Russian imperialism. Ukraine should have been given everything from the beginning, no strings attached, with no self-imposed red lines.

    They will swallow another democracy in 10-20 years and the cycle repeats.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      And that would likely have ended the war sooner, causing less people to die, and making Putin less likely to try something like it in the future.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Tactically, the plan is to make Russia bleed to death rather than temporarily paralyse it.

      Maximizing the loss of russian life and draining the russian economy to the point that the population won’t tolerate any further war is the goal. It’s unfortunate that this is at the cost of ongoing war in Ukraine.

      • GuitarSon2024@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        This is a solid take, but the other side of the issue is the question of how long will it take the brainwashed Russian population to realize the economy has passed a point of no return? Outside of major cities much of Russia lives in 3rd world poverty. Will they even notice if the ruble falls to zero?

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          Some might not notice a change in the economy, but they will notice that their sons are being taken and that they are not coming back.

          Approximately 1 in 1000 Russian males have now been killed. How many more will have to die for the average Russian to say “no more” is a tough question.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        they’ll give a shit once all other options have been exhausted, and people realize the next step is actual shooting war, with the bombs falling on Warsaw, Helsinki, Berlin, etc. When they realize they’re on their last legs before the big one, then they’ll take it seriously.

        America is a write off, Regulatory captured by the Russian Federation / Russian Mob, Same thing At the very least until 2026 midterms. Europe is still in denial that its time to switch from butter, to guns. Literally

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      everything keeps pointing to time being a circle, the same things will continue to happen every 20-30 years. like the show Dark.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 年前

      Ah yes “muh Russian Imperialism” argument/excuse that we all heard a bajillion times

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      America can tell Russia Ukraine formally surrenders, and that the moon is made of cheese, it isnt going to stop anyone from fighting to protect themselves.

      The fact that even western countries seem to think that there can be negotiations about the fate of Ukraine and its people, without the Ukrainian voice present, is laughable and directley supports Putin and the Russian Mafia’s fantasy-narrative.

      • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        If America and NATO pull back support, Putin will just say “fuck it” and take all of Ukraine and then do whatever he wants. Putin wants every territory that used to be Russia.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          even if Nato tucks its tails between its legs and runs away from a winnable confrontation, Russia isn’t taking the whole country, they don’t have the manpower to run an occupation on a territory the size of Texas, with one of the most heavily armed and battle hardened populations on earth.

          Russia already signed away any hope of an occupation that didn’t fight them tooth and nail to the death, when they decided to massacre the villages of Bucha , Irpin, and Konotop. The world saw Russia for what it was then, That event “steeled” the resistance. I’m not trying to use hyperbole or sensationalism here, I’m stating that flat out, the Ukrainian people saw that the Russians will murder every single person who doesn’t submit, and they’ve only continued that savage barbarism ever since. Bombing and Murdering people into submission NEVER works. It only gives them a reason to fight.

          they weren’t equipped to do an occupation in 2022. they sure as shit are less equipped to do so now. It would be one of the bloodiest insurgencies in history. The Taliban didn’t have Leopards, Javelins, and HIMARs rockets they could put into hiding.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 年前

            They have no intention of occupation. They will raze every city to the ground to control the pipes and food. They just want the pipes and food, and people who don’t allow that are just going to be ground up like so much meat.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Putin wants every territory that used to be Russia.

          And then when he gets them all, he will want every territory that’s near Russia.

          And people will be like “Oh no, why didn’t anyone DO something when we could?”

  • mycall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 年前

    While what Zelenskyy says is absolutely true, no county is obligated to help. Is this a good strategy to lend into?

  • Wisas62@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 年前

    Except that they can’t, especially Europe. While EU has drastically reduced oil and gas from Russia it’s still like 20%. I’ve heard Hungary and Austria don’t have access to gas from other countries other than Russia. (If someone has a source that says otherwise I’d be open to it).

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 年前

    The only thing that’s worse than having the US as your enemy, is having the US as your ally.

    • Saryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      Speak for yourself. A majority of Eastern Europeans see the US as a key strategic ally, and for good reason.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 年前

      The original quote is: “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.” – Henry Kissinger

      • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        They sure LOVED having the US as an ally when they were getting their asses handed to them during WW1 and WW2.

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 年前

    Yet, all other countries are supposed to send unlimited amounts of money and weapons? This is the same bullshit with everyone else… you want all our money, and that’s it.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        And that’s the problem I have with how “some” of the government is selling this thing… “if we don’t send UNLIMITED funds to Russia, they’ll keep taking over everything!” And I just don’t buy it. Putin doesn’t want to be surrounded by NATO, that’s the sole reason he’s going after Ukraine. He’s not going to “keep going” like some are proclaiming, because he knows that will be a death sentence.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        And that’s the US’s problem right? We’re the World Police only when it’s convenient for some, but not others? If it that’s the case, I really wish people would stop hating on our government when we’re doing things like financing small proxy wars…

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 年前

    The right? Maybe not. The ability though? Certainly. Specifically the US absolutely has the power to negotiate an end to the war with Putin.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 年前

      They could negotiate Russia’s end to the war using their own resources (ie. Mostly the embargos) but anything Ukraine forfeits would have to be negotiated by them. The US can’t just cede another nation’s land.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        We effectively can if we threaten to pull all support and harass Ukraine instead…

        Not that I want that, or have any say in that as a US citizen…

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 年前

          There’s no threat needed. Zalenskyy already knows he’s losing US support after January.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        The effect would be exactly that. Actually the US ending support for Ukraine would result in not just ceding current borders, but huge additional losses.

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          This is literally Zalenskyy saying we can’t negotiate for him while knowing that he’s losing US support in January.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 年前

            He’s doing whatever he can, but ultimately him saying this doesn’t make it so-- no matter how much he (or you) wish it would. Ukraine has been losing ground even with US support and they will only lose more without it. To pretend otherwise is to live in a fantasy. In such a situation the US has at least as much control over how much Ukrainian territory ends up under Russian occupation, as does Ukraine.

            • legion02@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 年前

              You’re confusing losing land because you can’t hold it militarily with negotiating an end to the invasion by ceding land. He’s said that no one will negotiate for Ukraine but Ukraine and since the incoming US administration has already said they’ll be ending support we really don’t have any leverage to encourage them to accept any terms. We can’t threaten to remove support that we’ve already said we’re removing.

              • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 年前

                I’m saying that there isn’t much of a difference. I agree that Ukraine is fucked and that the time for negotiations is long gone. Why would Russia negotiate now when they expect a clear advantage on the horizon?

                I think Zelensky is saying this to look tough and keep the support from Europe coming in at least.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        Unfortunately the US definitely can since it gave a lot of military aid to Ukraine. It can force Ukraine to cede land

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 年前

    Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine alone determines its future and any dialogue with Russia must follow a peace plan based on strength and international support.

    Support [outside of the racist countries’ unilateral support for Israel] will always be based on agreements. It doesn’t matter how much Ukraine supports Israel or sends its mercenaries to Gaza. How many countries will help out another for no return?

  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 年前

    In principle I agree, but he doesn’t really have a choice. Other world leaders are providing the funds to continue the war in the first place. If Zelensky does something they don’t like, they can just stop the funding and end the war on Russian terms.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      You need to educate yourself on the geographical foothold that Ukraine is. It is a very important part of land with mobilisation consequences. Without it, at least for now, it leaves very drastic measures as the only option.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      If Ukraine loses we will have war with Russia (now able to use their resources and people) and we will have to send our soldiers.

      Military analyst Anders Puck Nielsen, who was spot on with predictions when covering this war says that is we allow cease fire without security guarantees for Ukraine this ultimately will be victory for Russia.

      https://youtu.be/MhpoNL1gZbw

      It looks like the vast majority of people in the West don’t really understand what this war is about.

      • MehBlah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        Not in 2014 and not now. I remember how no one understood in my circles what it meant when they booted out putins puppet.

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 年前

        I don’t see how any of this takes away from what I said. Ukraine can’t continue the war themselves, so they have no choice but to do what their benefactors wish.

        • takeda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 年前

          So is Russia. Russia was unable to help Armenia, what we see in Syria, there are some signs of things breaking up in Libia, Georgia, we will see how Belarusian election will go in January, last time Putin needed to send his military to stop the protests.

          The war economy cannot work forever and 2024 was estimated to be its peak for Russia.

          The support the West is providing also is negotiable (compared to GDP) and if Russia will win in Ukraine we will have to spend 7 times more while being in actual war according to analysts.

          • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            I still don’t see how any of this takes away from my point. Are you just saying that other countries have a vested interest in the continued existence of Ukraine as we know it? Because I know that, that’s why they started funding the war in the first place.

            Let’s say that when Trump takes office he negotiates new terms with Putin. Zelensky will agree to those terms because he knows things will only be worse for his country if he continues fighting without US support.

            Are you just trying to say that the us or other countries would never threaten to pull support because it would be foolish? If so, then you don’t know how common fools are. What is it you think Trump means when he says he will end the war immediately after taking power?

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    1 年前

    It’s terribly ironic to watch people who support US interventionism pretend that Ukraine gets to have any real say in their own destiny at this point. Hundreds of billions of US taxpayer dollars do not go into your coffers without strings.