Trump can have one more felony, as a treat

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m so glad he pissed off the army before trying to stage his second coup.

    Good luck asshat.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      3 months ago

      He pissed off the 60% of the army who already knew what a disgusting failure of a human he is.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The US military is aggressively non-political. Don’t count on them to do anything as long as the civilian institutions do nothing.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s not the point. The Military is no longer a tool he could use. Staying neutral unless things get really bad is a good thing. He’s already tried to use the military against protestors. (And the military told him to pound sand)

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just means they can be deployed against traitors, not that they have the authority, or consider themselves to have the authority, to make the judgement on who is and is not traitorous.

          Civilian control of the military is a good thing. But it also means that any thought of the military as a safeguard against any tyranny that worms its way in through civilian institutions is… misguided.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            May seem sad, but in fact good if really works this way.

            Since I’m in Russia and here shit went wrong (EDIT: after the last time shit went right) since Yeltsin using military to “resolve” a constitutional crisis in 1993 (not really a crisis, just when the Supreme Court says both Yeltsin and his opponents in the parliament should resign and have new parliament and presidential elections, that apparently is a crisis, because he’s the president, thus the boss and should be able to make all decisions ; that unironically was the main argument in support of Yeltsin, ex-Soviet people have a very weird idea of law and order, where the boss deciding something is “dura lex sed lex”, while referring to codified laws is “legal illiteracy”).

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, those families of fallen soldiers can go fuck themselves. They dishonor the memory of their children that made the ultimate sacrifice for this country. They don’t get to invite Trump to wipe his ass all over the graves of soldiers. Their children deserve respect, but they deserve scorn.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This was my thought as well. Can you really have loved your family member if you sell them cheaply to be used as political fodder? Is that what their memory is worth to you?

      This is the same level of disaffection that you saw from the pa firefighter widow who wouldn’t accept a phone call from Biden.

    • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, it’s even worse than that. My understanding is that the families that invited him are specifically families of soldiers who died during the pullout from Afghanistan. Y’know, the pullout that Trump announced out of the blue with zero prep work in the last year of his presidency and dumped on Biden’s lap. They are celebrating the man directly responsible for their kids’ deaths.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everyone posting quotes from the trump side, so here’s what the Army said:

    “This incident was unfortunate, and it is also unfortunate that the ANC employee and her professionalism has been unfairly attacked. ANC is a national shrine to the honored dead of the Armed Forces, and its dedicated staff will continue to ensure public ceremonies are conducted with the dignity and respect the nation’s fallen deserve,” the statement said.

    So the Army sided with the people at the cemetery, and tge following paragraphs indicate the Pentagon does as well.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m just exhausted at this point. Nothing he does phases me anymore. Just gotta say my piece at the ballot box and hope for the best

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m actually impressed a former president currently running for reelection managed to fuck up pandering to the military so bad the Army called him out for it.

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I’m so fucking tired of watching him break federal law out in the open with zero consequences over and over and over and over

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    The US Army published a measured response to the implicated poor behavior of an on duty servicewoman at ANC.

    The Army would very much object to this being categorized as “against” Trump. Rather in defense of their service members and their correct actions.

    The Army is careful not to overextend itself on political rhetoric and invite too much politics directly.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah for them to say this much is a big deal considering they like to stay out of this stuff. It’s pretty much a harsh repudiation coming from them.

  • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The army stated that they consider the matter closed according tovthe article. I doubt any legal action will come from this.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s not the point. Lots of people now see how tone deaf the entire campaign is.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It turns out that the police will absolutely rise up but the military is all about protecting and following the chain of command. I used to think as you do but I’ve since seen so many times when they have expelled the crazies. There’s no union protecting bad soldiers from consequences.

          • atocci@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m pretty sure they’re saying his followers are a cult, not the Army. His followers will easily take the word of him and his campaign over the Army and Arlington National Cemetery.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ve reread the comment a few times and still think that they were talking about the army. I do see what you mean though.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You say that yet everyone except the “base” is fleeing. Trump is limited to down ballot voters and whackadoos.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Look, come election day, I hope you’re right and I’m wrong. I’m just not seeing any conservatives “fleeing”.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s all over the news. Republicans coming out in support of Harris, etc.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not only that — what is the penalty for violating Section 60?

      The army acts like the employee being assaulted was the only issue.

  • Dashi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Where can I read in full what the army said? I couldn’t find anything in their official press releases