(Yes, of course I know that’s not the Enterprise-D and that TNG came out in 1986, but you try making a better debunking joke.)

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Faking the moon landing would have been a massive coverup requiring the cooperation of at least one foreign nation. (Australia, because of Parkes)

    During the Nixon administration. Nixon couldn’t even cover up one little burglary.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is the one thing that kills me with one of my favorite space movies, interstellar… they have that one scene at the school saying the landings were faked to bankrupt the soviets…like how the fuck did that make it into the movie.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not there as some commentary by Christopher Nolan that the moon landings didn’t happen. It’s there to show that schools are willing to teach a lie as long as it serves the narrative of “past oppulence is what destroyed our world, so get out there and be a farmer!”

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          O damn never thought of it that way. I went and looked it up further and you’re spot on, it seems it was put into the movie to make people become farmers and not look to space. Basically try and solve the problems on earth.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Also keep in mind that the astronauts communicated with Earth by radio. Anyone with even 1920s radio technology would have figured out that the astronauts weren’t broadcasting from the Moon.

    We were in the middle of a cold war with the soviets back in the 1960s. Proving the moon landing was fake would have been the propaganda coup of the century for them. What possible reason would they have to stay quiet about that?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      We were in the middle of a cold war with the soviets back in the 1960s. Proving the moon landing was fake would have been the propaganda coup of the century for them. What possible reason would they have to stay quiet about that?

      That’s always been my number one reason why the moon landing was definitely not faked. The Soviets never caught wind of it between 1969 and 1992? Come on.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Plus we left retroreflectors on the moon, that we can shoot laser beams at and get a return bean back.

        its used to measure the drift of the moon away from earth.

        the lunar reoglith is not reflective enough to bounce a signal back (and its been tested to death)

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          We know it reflects light, so that just tells me we haven’t used a big enough laser yet :p

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    But that’s a low-budget show. The Apollo Program had billions to invest in VFX.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The reason the conspiracy exists is because the video footage is staged to match the audio. Obviously there wasn’t a camera crew on the moon.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Decades since 1969 and not a single one of the thousands of people who would have had to be involved to make this hoax happen has talked. The Soviets also either never caught wind of it or decided not to embarrass their biggest rival who they were constantly trying to embarrass.

      This is the best-kept and worst-kept secret at the exact same time. Do you really buy that?

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re misinterpreting what I’m saying due to my poor word choices haha. I’m not saying it’s fake. The camera is mounted to the lander and there is a delay in the footage because they had to do some kind of conversion in the video to be able to watch on tv. That’s where many of the conspiracy theories come from. Most people don’t know that.