• Kamala Harris’ campaign is demanding that microphones stay unmuted at the next debate.
  • It’s a break from Joe Biden, who insisted on microphone muting at the June 27 debate.
  • It indicates the vice president thinks outbursts from Trump would end up benefiting her.
  • qprimed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    just me, or is this the most muscular feeling dem campaign in a loooong time?

    they are taking every opportunity to shine light into dark gop crevices, including the roach infested crevice of trumps mind.

    the smell republican blood in the water is a helluva drug.

    • I can’t wait until that first week of November when Beyoncé and Taylor Swift show up to help get out the vote.

      I was one of those that thought Joe Biden should stay in the race. And I’m so glad to be wrong.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was telling people we don’t really have a choice, since it’s ultimately something he gets to decide. I was surprised that he turned the pressure campaign into a fait accompli for Harris - which I doubt was the response they were hoping for.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I thought he should stay in the race because I also thought the Democrats were incapable of immediately coalescing behind another single candidate. If I had know they were capable of it, I would have been all for it.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except McCain still has more character in his dead pinky toe than Trump has in his entire body. For example, McCain told a lady to her face that Obama wasn’t a secret Muslim, and called for unity and respect in his concession speech.

  • moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 months ago

    There have been enough reports of Trump privately calling Kamala a b*tch that there’s a strong possibility he could snap and use that word if she starts to embarrass him. There’s also a non-zero chance of him using some other slur or just saying weird racist things

      • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        It would galvanize his base but they’re already a lost cause. Him having a racist/sexist outburst on live TV and Harris handling it like an adult would only help her campaign.

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m willing to bet that’s the goal on Harris’ part. The Democrats have finally found that the way to unravel him is just belittle him rather than giving him any measure of power. If the debate goes forward unmuted, she just has to be dismissive and call him weird/old/whatever and I guarantee he’ll fly off the handle.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      He was able to keep it contained against Hillary back in the day and just called her a “nasty woman”. He will have no such restraint with Harris. I’m expecting him to say he will “see you next Tuesday”, like he did with that lawyer. It’s the type of thing an edgy twelve year old would say, which is why I expect him to say it.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am sure that she has studied everything that he said about Clinton and all of his tactics and is just ready to tear him apart. That said I suspect his plan will be just to talk solidly and not give anyone a chance to say anything. The more noise he puts up and doesn’t answer any questions The less that he can get into trouble.

      I also suspect if it starts going poorly for him he just walks off stage.

      • Bakersfield@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I also suspect if it starts going poorly for him he just walks off stage.

        That would be great! Imagine the commercials:

        • [showing a clip of Trump storming off stage] “Do you want a president that runs away when things get difficult or do you want a leader?” [cut to Harris dominating the debate]

        Edit: typo

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Zero chance. I’m sorry. But he will not call her that to her face. He will say something unhinged for sure. But saying either of those things is far fetched.

  • g0nz0li0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Muted mics make him look like he’s being civil and letting Harris talk.

    Hot mic presents two interesting possibilities:

    1. He tries on his “low IQ” and “she suddenly decided to be black” attack lines and Harris calls him out so he looks like a fucking asshole to the average voter.

    2. He DOESNT try on his “low IQ” and “she suddenly decided to be black” attack lines and Harris calls back to her “say it to my face” line and paints him as a weak coward for the rest of the campaign.

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if it’s to hopefully get him to demand they be muted. Like she’s baiting him to do it.

    • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think it’s because she knows he’ll say some outlandish shit when it’s muted and she wants to make sure that when he forgets that he has a live mic, it’s all on tape.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        yup. basically she wants his crazy on full display.

        I’m not sure it’ll work in her favor, but, uh. it’s one way to counter the gish gallop. Just hand them the mic and then mock them later for being a lunatic.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s actually the best way to handle the Gish Gallop… Let them keep talking.

          Wait for them to say something truly outlandish. Respond by calling out their Gish Gallop, say that you’re only going to respond to the one thing so as to remain focused in the face of their gish gallop, and knock it out of the park.

          Let him throw you meatballs until you find your pitch.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, that’s the strategy of the media ever since he came down that stupid gold escalator in 2015. So far, hanging on his every word has only helped him.

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actually I heard this was happening with the Biden debate. No wonder he looked confused when an idiot is standing next to you screaming. I have to say, I hadn’t considered that issue before.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s the only way it’s a good idea. Otherwise, he’ll just keep interrupting her throughout the whole thing and she won’t be able to get a word in edgewise.

      Yes she’s a former prosecutor and thus used to argue for a living but that was a) a long time ago and b) in a highly regulated setting where there’s serious consequences for breaking decorum.

      In a “debate” on a for-profit yellow media outlet, he’s not going to be held in check by the moderator(s) or anyone else and even though most if not all of his blathering is going to be lies, he’s likely going to win by default for being “high energy” or whatever bullshit the corrupt pundit class comes up with to spin his lunacy and childish bullying as a show of strength.

    • That’s how it read to me:

      “The VP is ready to debate Trump live and uncensored,” Harris’ advisor Brian Fallon wrote on X on Monday. “Trump should stop hiding behind the mute button.”

      Fallon suggested that Trump’s campaign would not agree to that condition, writing that Trump “should reject his handlers’ attempts to muzzle him via a muted microphone.”

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    It doesn’t matter what he says, we’ve heard it all before. He’s a one-trick pony.

    The problem is that he’s going to gish gallop and lead the conversation by trying to get Harris to be the one trying to disprove all his bullshit. It’s a major MO in republican discussion to spew bullshit in bad faith that wastes the time of the opponent who is attempting to have an actual conversation and tries to reasonably refute the bullshit. The bullshit is reductionist, sensationalist, and full of feels, so it gets attention vs. the actual facts which tend to be the exact opposite. Trump will absolutely talk all over her, interrupt, and just be an asshole.

    So trump’s mic should absolutely be shut off. He wastes time and opportunity for Harris to state her platform.

    Plus, I think being unable to be heard really pisses him off. So I’m all for that, too.

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is that muting his mic when it’s not his turn to talk doesn’t keep him from spewing rampant bullshit when it IS his time to talk.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Of course!

        But it keeps him from spewing rampant bullshit over his opponent.

        Lesser of two evils? He’s gonna be a tool no matter what, just minimize his opportunity to do so.

        • Red_October@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The question becomes whether or not that interrupting bullshit stream actually harms him more than it helps.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ok. I already know I dislike trump and will not be voting for him. It think most people at this point, if they aren’t absolute troglodytes living under a rock, already know trump’s behavior. If it hasn’t already cemented his idiocy in their minds, I don’t think one more minute on TV will change that.

            One of the only pieces of political TV I watch is the debate because I’d like to hear what their points are. I rarely make it all the way through a debate because I’m usually disgusted by both participants’ behavior and performance.

            I absolutely despise the childish talking-over each other, over-running of alotted time, and failure to answer questions.

            Forcing the silence of participants alleviates the talking over, overrunning, and at least allows the participants time to form an answer - if they don’t waste time bickering.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          She can interrupt him as well when he’s lying. Biden just had to listen.

          It benefits the smarter and more coherent person when mics are unmuted, if played correctly.

  • gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Her campaign team was there to know what Trump was saying when the mic was off during the last debate with Biden. I think they likely have some great insider information on top of the basic strategy. I think they know from experience, not just theory, that he just isn’t in control of himself enough to go that long without embarrassing/racist/misogynistic/whatever outbursts.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    The debates are kinda BS. The country is clearly divided on who they’re voting for and they’re not changing their minds.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      Clearly not, since the most recent one is why we have Harris instead of Biden as the candidate.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The election is a circus, the candidates are Carneys. They have great games and fabulous prizes, they just need your vote.