Summary

Trust in the U.S. judicial system has hit a record low, with only 35% of Americans expressing confidence, according to Gallup.

Criticism centers on the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, accused of advancing right-wing agendas, eroding rights like abortion access, and lacking accountability.

This judicial capture, orchestrated by conservative groups like the Federalist Society, ensures Republican dominance in key policies for decades, regardless of future elections.

  • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    28 days ago

    Blatant corruption, even in the highest court, will do that. Get Thomas out of there. Make Trump pay for his crimes. Otherwise, I guess it’s plumbing time.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    28 days ago

    Luigi Mangione has a higher favorability than the US justice system.

    That’s where we’re fucking at.

  • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    28 days ago

    Dylan Roof kills 9 black people to start a race war. Luigi popped a CEO who was in charge or a system that killed thousands. Which one gets the terrorism charge and why? To send a message, so the serfs don’t get uppity. Why would we trust the system? We all know the resources exist, but we still suffer and starve. Fuck the system and fuck the elites.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      28 days ago

      Dylan didn’t have to be charged with terrorism to get the death penalty in SC. NY State law requires the terrorism charge to be able to sentence Luigi to the death penalty. It’s precisely because Luigi didn’t kill a bunch of people that they have to tack on the terrorism charge, but them being so bloodthirsty is very likely to backfire. They could have gotten the 2nd degree murder charge and life in prison, but it’s gonna be damn near impossible to find 12 people that will convict beyond a reasonable doubt on terrorism.

      Sure it highlights how bloodthirsty these ghouls at the top are, but it may not work for them the way they want it to.

      Dylan is currently on death row. Waste of taxpayer money if you ask me. Life in prison with no chance of parole is cheaper by multiple factors.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        28 days ago

        The terrorism charge also brings his motivation front and center. If it was a 2nd degree murder only, they might have been able to suppress a lot of discussion about UnitedHealth for being irrelevant and prejudicial. But now they not only have to discuss it, but they have to allow the defense to respond to it. If they aren’t careful, this could easily open the door to a jury nullification strategy.

      • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        They’ll find the 12 jurors they need. If they don’t I’m sure they’ll have at least 1 that will insist on guilty to make it a hung jury, then it’s unlimited do-overs

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Won’t trust it until Trump is in a cell.

    There’s two justice systems. There’s two classes. Until this bullshit ends, it’s the same as it ever was.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          From what I read Biden didn’t seek that judge to pardon, he was just one person affected by some big mass pardons. In this case I think he was one of like 1500 people who were moved to house arrest for non-violent crimes during Covid, who Biden pardoned all at once.

          Still not great, the administration should’ve reviewed the details of those cases first, but it’s not like he deliberately sought the guy out.

          • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            27 days ago

            I get that non-violent crime has a specific meaning in law, but calling the selling of children, causing massive psychological damage non-violent really rubs me the wrong way. Not a criticism of you but of the system that conciders it non-violent just because it was done with the stroke of a pen instead of the wave of a gun.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            How can we know this for sure though. Not trying to throw rocks at you, but to me that really sounds like speculation. at the end of the day he is accountable for his actions and I have seen way too many “woopsies” in the arc of his career. Past a certain point “I made a mistake” loses all credibility.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              I mean, epistemologically we can’t know anything for sure. All we can do is try to come to reasonable conclusions with the information available to us.

              The job of President is complicated. It is not remotely possible to go over every single detail of every single action. Every president makes whoopsies, I prefer to give benefit of the doubt between mistakes and malice. There are plenty of intentional things to criticize without sensationalizing this sort of thing

              • kreskin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                I mean, epistemologically we can’t know anything for sure.

                True, and worth remembering. But when lucy keeps pulling ther football away from charlie brown, you tend to start blaming charlie brown for not seeing it coming.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Yeah, but Lucy has been letting us kick a pretty good portion of them. Dems are abysmal at marketing, but this administration has actually accomplished a decent amount of actual good policy. There are obvious exceptions and shortfalls, but it’s not like every single football has been pulled away.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    28 days ago

    Why would I trust a branch of government who, amoung other things, said; president’s rule like kings; money is speech; rulings from the 1600s supercede any modern day interpretation of law.

    I wouldn’t invite a person like this into my house non the less let them rule a branch of government.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    30% lost faith when we prosecuted Trump.

    35% lost faith when Trump walked.

    Seems to track to me!

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      yeah, different parties. But Luigi appeals to both party’s constituents, so during his prosecution the judiciary is at an extra disadvantage. I imagine the government will try to use some sort of secret closed to the public terrorism court for this so they can eliminate the trial of his peers aspect of it. I’d bet real money on it right now, actually

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    28 days ago

    Trust in law enforcement has been plummeting for a long time too. Prosecutors are going to have a much harder time convincing a jury of much of anything.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        The dead guy was the terrorist. I am far from the only person who thinks so. It takes but one person to play ball during jury selection to ruin the state’s case. Perhaps, at long last, the people will reassert their power over the state.

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    28 days ago

    I know this is all about optics, but I’m sure for all the people who have had to deal with the criminal justice system they also know how shitty it is. 91% of cases result in a guilty plea, 7% end up in some sort of dismissal and only 2% actually go to trial. The system is built to make being guilty the easiest choice, and your lawyer will do everything in their power to get you to take it