• Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 days ago

      I remember learning from a teacher that the oil companies basically bought up transit lines and ripped up streetcar tracks as well as killing the electric car. It explains why my city struggles so hard to build subways and street car lines. There must still be lots of money lining pockets to keep the gasoline flowing

      • lonerangers1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Standard oil was pouring gasoline into rivers as waste before Henry Ford and his Model T came along.

        The auto industry gutted public transit across the country. GM diesel buses replaced electric urban rail systems.

        GM made the EV1 and it was a huge hit, then they destroyed them all after collecting them from their users (they leased them all, no one got a chance to buy any)

        And now, Ford just got a bunch of credit for putting a Billion $$ into the Detroit central train station, … so they can “design” EVs.

        They are mocking us, that train station has no trains because the auto industry killed them. The building was unused because of cars. And now they are going to design something that was figured out 125 years ago that they destroyed. It is a monument to their domination of our economy.

        Imagine, what kind of public transit we could have if we stopped building infrastructure for car companies and built actual mobility systems?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 days ago

      I’m fairly convinced that the reason internal combustion won - even though it would regularly break your wrist when you started it - was that it made loud noises.

      Back then cars were a luxury, and if you’re buying something flashy you want people to notice you. A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        12 days ago

        Fun to remember that Mr. Toad was a parody of all the dicks who drove cars.

      • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 days ago

        From an engineering standpoint, liquid fuels have a far greater energy-to-weight ratio than batteries. Some of the largest advancements in combustion engines for the purpose of conveyance were made during the world wars. Noise was something they actively fought against. Loud tanks are scary, but unexpected tanks are much scarier. If they really needed it to be loud, sirens exist (see: Jericho siren). The energy-to-weight problem is only now finally being solved via modern batteries using exotic materials and processes well outside of early 1900’s technology.

          • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            Oh certainly! I only felt the need to add the textbook answer because of the… Conspiratorial side of Lemmy that will happily believe misleading information as long as it confirms pre-existing biases.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

        They’re still doing exactly this. ICE designs have never been quieter, but meanwhile Ford and GM are pumping out the L O U D E S T car options in decades.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          To be fair BMW and VAG/AUDI put factory pop and crackle modes (intentional over fueling/backfires) in their cars too.

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            As someone who lives next to a road where this racket happens around the clock: screw those guys. I know there’s an overall theme of car companies externalizing environmental impact to the general public, but it’s like they went through a list and realized that “noise pollution” was worthy of a tad more exploitation. /rant

            • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Agreed. Harleys are waaaaaay fucking worse though, and most of them are de-catalyzed, so they’re fucking killing our lungs to.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s interesting to see this and be reminded that 110 years ago electricity was more readily available than gasoline. It took time for gas stations to become widespread. Even in the post-WWII era it was not uncommon for drivers to encounter signs warning that the last gas station was approaching and there would be no more for another 60+ miles (100+ kilometers, I suppose). It took decades to expand the gasoline distribution network.

      In one sense electric vehicles are in the same boat today, at least in the US. From the standpoint of being able to charge at home, electric is more convenient and current models on sale likely have more than enough range for most people’s daily (or probably even weekly) commute. The cost advantage is also still there when charging at home. However, if you’re going on a roadtrip you’re much more likely to face long stretches without a fast charger, and probably no signs on the road warning you. It’s up to drivers to plan ahead to make sure they’ll have enough charge to make the next charger (and potentially have a backup location in case their first choice is full or broken). With the ubiquity of gas stations, and perhaps even more so GPS navigation on our phones, most drivers aren’t used to doing much planning when going on road trips anymore.

      What is the title and who is the author of this book?

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    13 days ago

    Ever heard of the first car reaching 100km/h? Yep, an electric one, in 1899, “la jamais contente”

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      God, imagine the trouble we could’ve saved if battery technology was less primitive at the time.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      There’s an 80 year old HVAC system in a section of the hospital I used to work at. This thing is just a giant radiator with big clunky fans that blow the heat from it into the unit. To power it on in winter you have to use all those cool old dials and crank it up. That thing I don’t think has ever needed any major repairs and will last forever because it’s so simple.

      I now work in a newer condo building and the boilers and heating system is all digitally controlled and regulated. That thing goes down every other week and needs constant work

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      There’s a bit from Clarkson where he compares an old school aluminium-bodied Land Rover to the newfangled SUV things of the same brand. Used to be, switching to 4WD involved pulling a lever connected to a ferry-sized piece of metal going ka-chunk. Nowadays, you press a button and a red light comes on. How is that going to get you out of a ditch?

    • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Consider that the (in electric cars, obviously next-)most power hungry item on cars back then was the wind shield wiper motor. Modern cars easily put out 100kW, but then spend most of that in a thousand little ways. Back then, a 20W engine would be plenty.

  • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    An electric car must have been pretty dirty back then. Most power was made by much less efficient coal generators after all.

    I am not saying that this is still the case today, quite the opposite.

    (Although no car is always better than a car)

  • noughtnaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    I want to see a MUCH higher resolution version of this photo. To study both that Wall-mounted proton pack and that exquisite hat.