Summary

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) confirmed her proposed resolution to ban transgender individuals from using bathrooms that don’t align with their biological sex at the U.S. Capitol is aimed at Rep.-elect Sarah McBride, the first openly transgender member of Congress.

Mace also plans broader legislation for similar bans on federal property and in federally funded schools.

McBride responded by calling for respect and kindness among lawmakers.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) stated Republicans are working on a resolution to address the unprecedented situation while ensuring dignity and respect for all members.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    13 days ago

    Mace is a Republican, so I can understand why she might assume all members of congress as sex predators. Think about the people she surrounds herself with. She must be terrified, poor thing.

    Doesn’t excuse bigotry at all. The bill is hatred on paper.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    McBride is wrong. What’s needed is not “respect and kindness,” but instead contempt and ridicule for fascist bigots. Failing to properly ostracize them is part of how we got into this mess.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      From my understanding, 14th amendment protections are still being battled over in the courts. Many have sided in favor or sexual orientation or gender being something that should be considered in equal protection of the laws, but some have not, so this will probably be coming to the Supreme Court, especially if the majority in charge of everything see it as an advantageous time to do so.

      Agenda 47, the immediate plans for implementing Project 2025, has eliminating gender affirming care as a key priority. More money was spent on anti-trans campaigning than on many other topics combined this election cycle.

      In theory, the laws of individual states protecting LGBT people would still apply, but other parts of Agenda 47 call for economically hammering states that try to go against expanded executive power, sounding similar to how the national drinking age was raised by withholding funding for highways.

      I think there is a time bomb on these protections right now, and I would be hesitant to count on them for very long. I feel like writing all this makes me sound alarmist, but that is how I feel based on what they’ve been saying and running on these last 8+ years. My best friends are gay, but also public educators. They’re Republican leaning centrists, and don’t seem to be concerned, so I may be off base, but I tend to trust people when they come out in the open as bad people without shame.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 days ago

    Someone should propose a house rule that bans sex offenders from the bathrooms. Looking at you Matt.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Mark my words, this will pass, even if only to set the stage for what trans people will have to deal with for the next four years.

    Part of me expects regular motions to have her expelled entirely. And there’s a non-zero chance that they’ll just drop the threshhold needed to expel a member to simple majority because fuck what the Constitution says, they have control now.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 days ago

    To all the people saying to put in gender neutral bathrooms, remember, the point is to sow division. The GOP doesn’t actually want solutions that make this issue go away.

  • enbyecho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is going to get complicated. The only way to be sure that, for example, Nancy Mace is actually the “she” “she” says “she” is is to check. And if we do that, to be fair, we gotta check everyone which means were going to discover that so many allegedly “male” members (heh) of congress do not, in fact, have any balls. WHAT THEN NANCY?? WHAT THEN???

  • Ackron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m going to need to see the long form genetic tests that prove that Mace is a biological woman as well, then. It’s only fair, right?

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    They be fucking their Lolita express deliveries in those bathrooms, no legit politicians allowed!

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    Hang on, doesn’t that mean the law can be challenged even if it passes? You can’t discriminate against individuals or specific US businesses with legislature.

    It’s called a Bill of Attainder.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    After some fear-mongering and a knee-jerk reaction from Speaker Johnson we can boast that no dicks will go anywhere near Nancy Mace. Mission Accomplished!!!

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is a great use of time. I’m sure it’ll lower the price of eggs, which I’m told are more expensive than Faberge eggs thanks to Biden.