Summary

Kamala Harris’s political skills have transformed a potentially disastrous 2024 presidential election into a competitive race.

Despite initial skepticism and a challenging campaign, Harris has improved her public image and closed the gap with Trump on key issues. Since Biden stepped aside in July and endorsed her, she has shifted from an unpopular vice president to a viable candidate, even matching Trump in polls on economic issues.

Her leadership has given Democrats a chance to prevent a Trump landslide and halt the rise of American authoritarianism.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’d argue the opposite.

    The fact that Americans are possibly still voting for someone who will bring in the Fourth Reich if elected, over the first female president is a sign of just how badly Democrats have dropped the ball. ESPECIALLY after Jan 6th.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      I 100% agree except why is it that “Democrats dropped the ball”?

      Democrats aren’t voting for a fascist. Their politicians are not enabling a fascist. The Democratic voting base hasn’t been bamboozled by 30+ years of obvious propaganda pretending to be news.

      Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

      Democrats work on harm reduction because we don’t give them enough votes to make meaningful changes. A 1 or 2 vote margin isn’t enough to vote around the moles like Manchin and Sinema.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        Christians dropped the ball. Conservative immigrants dropped the ball. Legit news media dropped the ball. Large corporations and wealthy individuals dropped the ball… on purpose.

        There is a literal industry built on lies

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s not the Democrats’ fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded, brainwashed losers in this country who fall for every bit of propaganda the GOP puts out. Politics shouldn’t be about culture wars but that’s how the republicans get votes.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        28 days ago

        It is the Democrats fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded losers in charge of the party though.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      28 days ago

      I think both can be true. That she cleaned up the situation is a testament to her skill as a candidate, and the fact this situation happened is in no small part an indictment of the Democratic party, in which she’s among its most senior leaders

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    28 days ago

    Did she win? No? Then it doesn’t fucking matter!

    What? Should she be getting a participation trophy? Sorry, I can’t hear you over how Ukraine is being annexed by Russia.

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Also it wasn’t a toss up. Trump won every single swing state. All of them. This article is some mad copium. Prepare to see more of it over the next few days.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I know right. They act like Harris was some plucky underdog. When in reality her party is only one of two that govern the most power country on earth.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      Voting is a two way street.

      You can’t put all the blame on voters and none on the campaign. One of those groups gets paid millions and millions of dollars to get a D president.

      When we ran a young charismatic candidate with a progressive campaign in 08, it was easy to get voters on board and red states became blue, it even carried over to flipping state governments

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        If we had a moderately sane Republican running, I’d agree with you.

        But anyone who looks at Trump and thinks “Yep, that guy should have the nuclear football” is a fucking moron and I’m terrified that they’re allowed to operate motor vehicles.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          But you can still make the argument the DNC seeing trump and using that as an excuse to run candidates more conservative than Dem voters are is also a dangerous thing…

          That’s what I’m saying, you can blame 10s of millions of voters, or the handful of people at the DNC who get paid millions to get a Dem elected.

          Both should do the right thing, and I get criticizing both. I even get criticizing the handful of wealthy unelected people running the DNC as the priority.

          But I’ll never understand why so many people demand only voters compromise and insist the handful of unelected wealthy, powerful, and connected people running the DNC are above reproach

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            If the Republicans were running a sane choice, then Democrats holding to their ideals would be key. Voters would have an actual choice and candidates would need to better distinguish themselves

            However we have a scenario where the Republicans candidate is not a sane choice for the future of our democracy, our country, our future, and are in some sort of bizarro world where half the population is fine with that. A bizarro world where saying the quiet part out loud is “telling it like it is”, where blatant corruption and fascism is somehow not just tolerated but even celebrated. Where it’s ok to be racist, sexist, and scapegoating is the strategy of the day

            While I’m happy to be voting FOR Harris, it’s critical in so many ways to vote AGAINST Trump, his excesses, his corruption, his abuse of power, his signature for sale, his lackey for Putin, his willingness to sacrifice our future for more money today, his narcissism at the expense of the citizens a President is meant to serve

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            I don’t blame Democratic voters. I blame every voter. This should be a no brainer. Trump should be polling in the single digits.

            Americans are fucking stupid. The ones who vote are stupid. The ones who run the parties are stupid. The ones who don’t vote are stupid.

            I keep trying to hitch a ride off this bug infested mudball but even the aliens know to avoid it.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              28 days ago

              And in 08 a young charismatic candidate with a progressive platform got them to vote for him even in red states

              The voters will vote if given a better option.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      Or is a testament to how effective rich authoritarians have been at keeping much of the public uneducated and or fed misinformation.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      27 days ago

      Panelist on pbs live election coverage was saying Harris ran a flawless campaign. They just dont get it.

  • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    28 days ago

    Why is no one discussing Dems have lost the senate and given a bigger majority in the house to Republicans. Even without Trump they are bound to control house and the senate.

    Stand by for nothing happening for the next 2 years or worse.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Edit: If Kamala loses, and it looks like she might, I’m blaming her and her campaign. She could have swooned the beliefs of America if she had ran on something better.

    Her political skills are trash.

    Kamala gained the most approved points after Biden gave her the race.

    Since then, her approval rating has plummeted compared to her early numbers, and I think this is because Kamala doesn’t really know what to believe.

    You can see it with Tim Walz. There was a lot of momentum when Kamala took up the mantle, and that momentum was carried through once the Walz pick came out. Then, around the DNC, the campaign’s tone shifted, crawling back to the ethos of the Biden administration. I think this is because Kamala couldn’t decide to break away from Biden or not, and because she waited so long, she was around a lot of the same people in the Biden administration, and those people influenced her platform. You can also see this with marijuana and how she changed sides in her time between being DA and senator. Also, how she didn’t really have a solid platform to begin with, which should have been established right when Walz was picked.

    I’m not here to call her out as a flip flopper. I’m pointing to how she could have steamrolled this election, but chose not to. It saddened me so much when the campaign had silence Tim for his views and policies when those views and policies were the key to victory.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    28 days ago

    Close, but no cigar does not preserve actual democracy, unfortunately.

    Calling yourself a democracy, and being a democracy are two very different things. The first proper word in North Korea’s official country name is “Democratic”, and bear in mind Russia holds “elections” as well.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    What’s more amazing is that no one is saying “is America ready for a woman president?” this time around, like they were in 2016. It’s refreshing, but also sad that it took this long.

    Never fucking mind. At this point I decide whether suicide or applying for a green card is the easier option.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    28 days ago

    I am not dismissing Kamala Harris here but the Democrats could have pitted a cold cut sandwich against Trump and the race would be just as tight. This is a race between fascism and not.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    People: “We don’t want old!” Biden: “I still got this!” Debate. “Maybe I don’t.” Harris: “I’m not old!” People: “Good enough!”

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    No it’s not, liberals tried the age old tactic of getting minorities and the working class to vote for neoliberals that have devastated their well being for 50 years because the GOP is racist, and for some reason it didn’t work this time.

    Y’all took the wrong lesson from COVID and 2020. It wasn’t that voters were going to continue to put up with Democrat’s fealty to the right and corporate donors. It was that COVID was so unprecedented that they held their nose one last time. ,

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    28 days ago

    The enduring fact is that our election cycles don’t have to last years. She did this in a little over 100 days.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      The Primary system is fucking broken. It only exists to make some states “Princess for a Day” and guarantee some advertising dollars. It is only so long because some states want a week to themselves, or want to be “first in the nation” or some other bullshit like that. And the parties do whatever they can to tip the scales all the time.

      If I were in charge, I would change it like this:

      • All primary elections for President must occur within a four week span in May or June.

      • 12 or 13 states go in each week. The order will vary from election to election, so the same bucket of states only goes first once in 4 elections.

      • there must be at least three candidates for any primary to happen. Less than 3 candidates = no primary.

      • parties are free to ignore these rules, but then they should settle their candidate by some other method than a state-wide primary that taxpayers pay for.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    28 days ago

    It is a much better situation than we were in just a few short months ago, so we’ve got that going for us, BUT we’re living in the age of huge organizations not being able to stick the landing and epic faceplants that are screwing up countries/empires virtually overnight, so… yeah.