• OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The entire thing is the author wanking himself silly over his knowledge of pop culture references from his childhood. Some of it reads like it was written by a 14 year old who isn’t all that into books.

      The bit about the gaming suit that wanks the user off but also means you’re exercising so you get fit from wearing it was honestly one of the cringiest things I’ve ever read. If I thought the author was capable of the level of self reflection required, I’d have thought writing that part of the book was him acknowledging that the book is literally a work of literary masturbation.

      It should have received the same response as The Room; a bad book only made into a cult classic by the people laughing at it.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was far too young to read Animal Farm. I thought it was going to be like Charlotte’s Web. I did not have any of the historical or political context for the metaphor. It just made me angry.

  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    “The Cat Who Walked through Walls” by Robert Heinlein…

    Now Heinlein is usually kind of obnoxiously sexist so having a book that opens with what appears to be an actual female character with not just more personality than a playboy magazine centerfold, but what seems like big dick energy action heroesque swagger felt FRESH. Strong start as you get this hyper competent husband and wife team quiping their way through adventures in the backwoods hillbilly country of Earth’s moon with their pet bonsai tree to stop a nefarious plot with some promised dimensional McGuffin.

    Book stalls out in the middle as they end up in like… A swinger commune. They introduce a huge number of characters all at once alongside this whole poly romantic political dynamic and start mulling over the planning stage of what seems like a complicated heist plot. Feels a lot like a sex party version of the Council of Elrond with each of these characters having complex individual dramas they are in the middle of resolving…

    Aaaand smash cut. None of those characters mattered. We are with the protagonist, the heist plan failed spectacularly off stage and we are now in his final dying moments where we realized that cool wife / super spy set him up to fail like a chump at this very moment for… reasons? I dunno, Bitches amirite?

    First time I ever finished a book and threw it angrily into the nearest wall.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel that a lot with Heinlein. Starts good with an interesting premise, becomes weirdly sexual, and the ending leaves you wondering whether the premise even mattered.

  • proudblond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wizard’s First Rule by Terry BrooksGoodkind. I suffered through the whole thing because I was young enough that I thought that’s what you should do when you’ve started a book, but I was also old enough to know that it was very bad. I’ve heard many people say they read it as teens and loved it, but I assure you, it does not hold up.

    • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      In the later books they accidentally open a portal to the part of the world where there are communists and for a while afterwards Richard finds himself unable to eat cheese as penance for all the communists he’s killing but then he realizes that communists are so evil it’s ok to kill them so he can eat cheese again

    • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know if it’s the absolute worst I ever read but the parts I read were pretty bad. At some point I was like “What kinda Ayn Rand bullshit is this?” and quit reading. It turns out that he was a Ayn Rand make-super-improbable-and-convoluted-examples-in-my-fictional-fantasy-world-to-justify-terrible-political-views school of writing type guy.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s probably not the worst for me either but it’s easily the first thing I think of. Really left a bad taste I guess.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I read a bunch of those books because my roommate was in love with them. It established an idea of a writing flaw in my mind that I called “The Heirachy of Cool”. Basically the guy practically has an established character list of who is the coolest. Whichever character in any given scene is at the top of the hierarchy is mythically awesome. They have their shit together, they are functionally correct in their reasoning, they lead armies, they pull off grand maneuvers, they escape danger whatever…

      But anyone below them in the Heirachy turn into complete morons who serve as foils to make the people above them seem more awesome whenever they share page time together. These characters seem to have accute amnesia about stuff that canonically happened very recently (in previous books) so they can complicate things for the hierarchy above, they usually make poor decisions due to crisises of faith in people above them in the hierarchy… But because that hierarchy is infallible it’s predictable. Less cool never is proven right over more cool.

      … Until that same character is suddenly alone and they go from being mid of the hierarchy to the top and all of a sudden they have iron wills and super competence…

      Once I caught onto that pattern it became intolerable to continue.

    • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      What I remember most vividly from that series is how absolutely bone-chilling everything about the Confessors were. You could absolutely have a really cool and interesting fantasy series in which they’re the main villains, but Terry Goodkind’s political views just wouldn’t allow it.

      • FitzTheBastard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or even just digging into their internal struggles due to the inherent loneliness that their powers creates. Instead we got a wierd post period sex blowjob to Richard role playing as his brother or something stupid that I can’t remember

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      On a somewhat lower pedestal: Eragon. What a hugely derivative poorly written piece of crap. I’ve run D&D campaigns with better dialogue and pacing than that.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh yes I agree! And I’m a huge dragon fan, so it was extremely disappointing. That one I gave up on after maybe 50 pages. I couldn’t get past the prose. So I didn’t even get to the heavily recycled tropes, but I did see the movie once and they were plenty obvious from that.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Damn I legit liked this book, one of my top series. I just enjoyed the magic system, the antagonists, and the over the top nature. I might just have bad taste though lol.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Moby Dick is the book I hated the most. Just the worst slog that i remember making it through.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know there are a lot of people who love it for the same reasons I hated it, people have different tastes.

        I love Lord of the Flies because it gets to the point!

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Mein Kampf. I read it when i was still a succdem, expecting some genius rant that converted people en masse to nazism. Instead it was barely coherent disgusting racist drivel. I guess this book didn’t make anyone into nazi, it just given nazis what they would like to read. This and the fact nazi state bought huge amounts of it to distribute, making Hitler richest writer in Germany.

  • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Alchemist and Song of Achilles are some popular books that I thought were mediocre. Probably not the worst book I’ve ever read though.

    That probably goes to Sean Hannity’s Conservative Victory that my grandma gave me when I was 12.

    True slop. Fuck Sean Hannity.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can’t really remember of all time, but recently I started reading Dune: Messiah, and I had to stop reading it was so bad. I might be in the minority but the tonal shifts, changes in character attitudes, and jumping right into these assassination plots, all of it just came out weird and misplaced. Definitely did not slap with even 1/4th the power of Dune.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Herbert didn’t want to continue Dune and was pressured to write a follow up. It was an era when most science fiction was still published in periodicals. The first half of Messiah are the results that were then compiled into the start. It is like a really shitty draft. Everyone experiences the same thing. I put it down for quite a while too. If you can make it to the second half, it will become one you can’t put down, like the first. It does setup well for what is to come. After I got back into Messiah, I read all the way to the end of the entire series, even the Brian Herbert/Kevin Anderson stuff. Those last two are not like Frank’s writings, but are their own thing and still more readable than the first half of Messiah. IMO the first half of Messiah is a great example of what happens when Art takes a back seat to an anxious banking type mentality. Bankers make terrible artists and advisors.

      GEoD is IMO the best book in the series as it eviscerates many cultural norms and deep assumptions like fascist altruism, eternal boredom, the coexistence of misogyny and feminism, manipulation that is both brutal and kind, and if an alien can be human. It even infers the question of potential delusional prescience in my opinion. It will make you think about the motivation of leaders and what you may endure because of their vision of a future.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hell yeah this is great to hear, thank you. I’ll have to open it back up and try again. Then its time to read the Foundation.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Don’t read the prequels by Brin and Bear, they are not only awful but also steer the lore into really dumb place which i’m pretty sure was not intended by Asimov. Though to be honest the two prequels by Asimov are also much worse than the main series.

      • cowfodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, none of that is true, and Herbert stated he had parts of Messiah and Children written before Dune was even finished.

        In the forward to Heretics of Dune: “Parts of Dune Messiah and Children of Dune were written before Dune was completed. They fleshed out more in the writing, but the essential story remained intact.

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          A sequel to Dune (1965), it was originally serialized in Galaxy magazine in 1969, and then published by Putnam the same year.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_Messiah

          I forget where the rushed admission and poor quality was blamed on the periodical and premature release, but am certain that is somewhere out there.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I listened to Atlas Shrugged as an audio book and it was ok at best. One massive criticism of communism and how it doesn’t work but suggested anarchist society as the solution. Weird rape-y sex scene in the middle also. Should have stuck with the social criticism instead of anarco capitalism utopia stuff and it’d have been good.

  • hackeryarn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    War and Peace. Heard so many good things about it. Despite everything, went in not having super high expectations.

    The whole book turned out like a reality tv show. All the characters had some petty drama that they blew out of proportion. Hundreds of pages where nothing really happens, people just complain or bad mouth other characters.

    I had to stop half way through.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I could only make a few pages in to the first chapter, it was hard to read, very, very detailed, which should be a good thing but I found myself losing track of where we even were or what the scene was about for all the detail. Once they started describing the buttons on the coat of one of the characters and how it had been the fashion some years prior at some point in the 19th century to wear them that way… I gave up. I’d like to try again some time but I can’t see myself experiencing it differently. Curious about the 7 years in the making Soviet film adaptation, but its also 7 hours long.

      • hackeryarn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        That looks really well done. And a lot of stuff would be condensed by having viduals.

        Doesn’t look like my preferred style… Maybe that’s why I couldn’t get into the book either 😅

        • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I tried reading the book but it was too much for me, so the series was easier to follow. I also tried listening to an audio book of tale of two cities but couldn’t get past the narrator constantly changing voices and accents for characters. I prefer when they just read

  • EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers. If you could distill pure insufferable smugness into a liquid, this was him squirting it into your mouth while you’re not paying attention and laughing at you while you sputter and gag.

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    bit of a cheat but 120 Days of Sodom

    The one redeeming part is the guy who fucks a horse and it gives birth to a half man half horse and then the fucks that

    the rest is descriptions of pedophilia, coprophagy and torturing children to death.

  • frigidaphelion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The bible. Set aside any religious connotations and just look at it as a piece of literature: it’s terrible.

  • Waldowal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The first 5 or so of Trump’s books. No meaningful lessons in business to be had. Just him bragging about people he knew, people he’d screwed over, how good he thought he was at pretty much everything. How he got back at anyone who crossed him. Insufferable. I knew he was one of the worst people ever before he even mentioned getting into politics.

    And in those 5 books, he probably name-dropped every New York socialite he ever met. It’s consistent with his whole image of self-worth and needing to look and feel important. You know who he didn’t mention? Someone we’ve seen him with in several photos? Who he definitely would have mentioned if there wasn’t a reason not to? Jeffrey Epstein.

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I haven’t read that, but his original novel Firefly is the only book I ever threw away instead of adding it to my collection shelves or trading it back to the used book store. It’s horrifically gross. One of the main characters is shown in a flashback enthusiastically participating in her rape as a five year old. Anthony is a problematic writer already, but this was way worse than I could have guessed.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I read all the Xanth novels as a teenager and it probably made my brain mushy. More mushy.

        My brain is just very mushy. The first few books were okay…ish, but they just got worse. And not just in a sexist way, but also a poorly written way.

        • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah, they were fine for my low standards as a young teenager, but I reread a couple and they aren’t great. Heck, book one has the MC making an amicus brief on the wrong side of a rape trial.

        • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Read the first book as a kid, thought it was pretty good, but was put off by all the sex stuff. Started reading the second book when I saw it in a library when I was about 15, and couldn’t get through the first chapter because of how sexist it was.