• _bcron_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    It’s not like he has much choice. Sane, reasonable people aren’t exactly raising their hands at this point and the only people clamoring for roles are batshit quasi-politicians who have similar contempt for any institution that has a basis formed in reality but wildly different agendas

    Edit: dunno why you downvoted me. Honestly, who else do you think would take these positions? Pence? Kelly? Barr? Mattis? Haley? Christie? Tillerson? Milley? Bolton? Scaramucci? Cohen? DeVos? Chao? Grisham? … Bueller? Dude’s a fucking joke. Take the wooden spatula and start scraping that barrel out because there’s absolutely nothing but sludge

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      They’re obviously being picked for their deviceveness. Not really sure what the endgame is other than to spread fear, anger, and uncertainty. Some strategists is coming up with these picks for some reason.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    So it took this guy 7 years to figure out that Trump is just as bad as all the other Hollywood rapists, and he has the audacity to present this to us as though that knowledge is breaking news in the year 2024?

    And these people wonder why their industry is being replaced by podcasts.

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    Remember: a plurality of voters reinstated him, knowing fully that he has been found guilty of sexual assault in a civil case and that he openly wishes to fuck his own daughter. This is the guy who grabs women by the pussy. Why would he give a shit about women?

    This abomination is brought to you by your compatriots.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I think he asked, 'Who do we have with a rape investigation? Let’s go with them!" to demonstrate his misogyny to the cult.

  • Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    14 days ago

    #MeToo is why the Democratic Party lost.

    Or at least it makes more sense than a lot of the other reasons I’ve heard that don’t involve the economy and low information voters.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes, I’m sure that was what did it and not the whole expecting people to vote for a black woman in an extremely racist patriarchy of a country thing.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Holy shit, how hard is it to tell that was sarcasm.

        What is wrong with people?

        • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          At least don’t use super giant letters and make it a little more obvious you’re trying to mock the weirdos, not rally them.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            Giant letters?

            How does saying people who are against the #MeToo movement are all Trump supporters, not calling them weirdos? I don’t think weird goes far enough.

            Sexual assault is illegal inspite of Republicans not because of them. In nany states a rape victim is legally obligated to birth their rapists child and they think that’s wonderful; Godly.

            • NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              It’s not calling them weirdos in their eyes, because they really do just see “#metoo” and (without understanding what it implies) they immediately register it as “godless liberal nonsense”. It may look like unmistakable exaggerated sarcasm to you, but if you visit any of the places where they talk, the way you wrote is exactly what they sound like, except without any sarcasm.

              Also, the hash symbol marks text as a header and it looks like this on my app: