Summary

Elon Musk has called on King Charles III to dissolve the UK Parliament, citing past controversies involving Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Rotherham Scandal.

Musk accused Starmer of inaction during his tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service and urged a new general election, drawing backlash for spreading misinformation.

Critics argue that the monarchy lacks the unilateral power to dissolve Parliament under the 2022 Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act.

Musk’s growing political involvement globally, including support for right-wing parties, has sparked calls for regulation against foreign interference.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, if the king really wants to become beloved of the people he should indeed make a visit to parliament, and request they dissolve Musk’s UK holdings.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is a 23 billion blackhole in the budget so we’re told. I think a one off tax of just 10% on Musk based on his total global net worth could be in order.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why is this reported on as if King Charles or anyone else in Britain should give a shit?

    • valkyre09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 months ago

      Here’s something kinda cool about the Monarchy. The king can just decide that Musk’s interference is illegal and shut down Xitter in the UK would be kinda funny.

      I’m not a fan of that approach, but at the same time you don’t ask cancer to leave your body, you cut that shit out!

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The king has no real power. Real power lies with the prime minister since previous kings with the same name and the Glorious Revolution. He’s a figurehead.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The word “theoretically” is doing a lot of lifting in that video. He said that the Queen is in important political figure, but that’s incorrect. The monarchy in the UK survives by being apolitical and they all know that the day they start meddling in politics is the day when the royal family loses its one remaining role in the UK - ceremony. Their long standing popularity comes from the pomp and circumstance, and if they get mixed up in politics, they’ll become deeply unpopular, just like everyone else who tells the British people what to do does in the end.

            All the real power went in the civil war and the glorious revolution. Parliament decides who is the monarch. If the king went rogue, he’d be gone before you can say “that’s not what we were looking for in the role of ceremonial figurehead.”

            “The Crown” actually includes, quite as a matter of law, the government and specifically the prime minister.

            So all the stuff about signing laws isn’t real power. It’s not about whether it becomes law, it’s about when it becomes law.

            The King is The Sovereign, but he is not sovereign, Parliament is sovereign.

            He embodies British power, but he doesn’t wield it.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I urge anyone with a bathtub full of acid to dissolve Elon Musk. It can also be an oil drum instead of a bathtub, or something else. I’m not too picky for that matter.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well, he has sausage fingers, but he can still do something like what Mummy likely would have done if some South African upstart tried to tell her what to do:

  • Opisek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can he please stop sticking his nose where it doesn’t belong. Being a US president isn’t enough. He wants to be the German chancellor and British PB now, too?

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    I was going to make a joke about how King Charles should dissolve Elon in a vat of acid, but I’m not sure if that’s comes off as promoting violence in our current climate of oligarchicide.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It would definitely be skirting the line of what we would moderate, but I think we’d probably let it go just because it’s a comic book villain ending rather than saying “shoot him in the head” or whatever.

      Plus, it would obviously be a joke.

      Edit: all I can picture is this, but with Elon’s face on it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s a mixed bag actually. Charles 2 did it successfully but only because he essentially had a popular mandate to do so. (Parliament kept trying to do an Inquisition of Catholics, and people were unamused.)

      James 2 tried to follow that act and was deposed in 3 years. So mileage may vary.