World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Amazing. Instead of just… fighting climate change by not polluting the planet let’s just fill our entire atmosphere with diamond dust, because that’s the logical decision of course.

    • Eximius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      It’s not really any different than usual dust, other than it is even more likely to scratch your phone (oh no!). The surprising thing is the bullshit price number, I’m sure it’s some brain-dead economist looking at the point-price for diamond and with great effort making a single multiplication.

      Edit: The study does note industrial diamond manufacturing, but doesn’t go into detail on why it’s so expensive for diamond powder, other than saying “it would require much more industrial diamond than is currently produced”… Which is just… Empty? Considering industry would change to account for such a drastic rise in demand.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m still set on “we’re fucked” until I see some more hopeful news.

    When we are fucked and who is first fucked, and making sure I’m not that guy is what I’m trying to determine.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, let’s just have everyone on Earth breathe in diamond dust all day every day. There’s no way that could be bad for our health.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s never been a case of something having different behavior or health effects just because of a tiny chemical difference (trans fat) or size difference (micro plastics), what’s the worst that could happen?

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of all the aerosols they could think about!

    No chance at all of a basically indestructible material not being destructed if absorbed by lungs (or gills) and leading to some disease. You don’t need to check. There’s no way this could go wrong.

    Or, rather… I believe lead is cheaper… Given how much people like to use it, maybe it’s a better option.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t get it, why wouldn’t sapphire dust work? Isn’t that dirt cheap to make? And it’s carbon free!
    Seems illogical to add carbon in the form of diamond, to a problem that is mostly caused by carbon?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are missing the point, because we need to do that anyway.
      The idea is to prevent things from getting worse in the meantime.
      Replacing fossil fuels take time no matter how much we invest.

      • ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        ok but you just know corporations are going to use this as an excuse to keep using fossil fuels. like to them this is basically carte blanche to keep the status quo and block green energy from happening even harder. “oh hurdur har har we found a solution to climate change and it’s dumping diamonds in the atmosphere, no need to pay for green energy anymore haha” type shit

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          corporations are going to use this as an excuse to keep using fossil fuels.

          Corporations follow the law, the only way to solove this is to have the laws required.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That amount sounds like total bullshit. Diamonds can be manufactured and once that is done at scale, it won’t be all that expensive. Even at $10000 a ton, five million tonnes would cost just 50 billion.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      $10000/ton is $5/lb from a quick google search they are about $250/lb for industrial diamonds. So 50* 50 or 2500 billion or 2.5 trillion with no idea if they can use run of the mill industrial diamonds or if there will be additional processing to get them into the aerosolized form also how are you going to launch them, and for how many years would we need to do it