Summary

Starting in 2026, California will require all new residential units with parking spaces to be EV charger-ready, significantly increasing access to electric vehicle charging.

Multi-family developments must equip at least one EV-ready spot per unit, while hotels, commercial lots, and parking renovations will also face new EV charging mandates.

Advocacy groups praise the policy, emphasizing its balanced approach to affordability and infrastructure needs.

The initiative aligns with California’s 2035 ban on new gas-powered car sales, aiming to address key barriers to EV adoption and support the state’s transition to electrification.

  • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unfortunately every apartment I have lived in with charging adds a massive markup to the electricity coming out of the chargers. At one place we were paying $150/month for a space with an EV charger and the electricity coming from the charger was still billed at around 10x the base rate. It was far cheaper to fill our plugin hybrid with gas than to use the charger in our parking space.

    I’m sure the same will apply here. It doesn’t help anyone if the complex is allowed to gouge the tenants on the electricity usage.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      In theory chargers being more readily available will help with this. If they mark up the electricity 10x and all the tenants just charge at work instead, there’s a motive to make the price more competitive. In practice we might just end up with more AI price fixing and consumers with no recourse.

      • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ironically, the chargers at my office ALSO charge a big markup.

        Competition is good, but landlords at offices and apartment buildings have a somewhat captive customer base who will often pay exorbitant prices for convenience.

        • homura1650@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          Renters are not that captive of customers. Once it becomes a common amenity, renters will start considering it as part of the rent when deciding where to live. Just like they do with utilities, garbage collection, and other amenities that landlords can charge for outside of base rent.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah, it’s really annoying. My ex’s association just voted against chargers. The plan was to set aside a distant parking lot and have a service come in to run them, profit off them.

      The thing is these are townhouses with front service entrance, mostly with parking spots just across the sidewalk. It would be cheaper and easier to run a wire from the service entrance under the sidewalk, to a pedestal by the spot, and let it be part of their regular electric bill. This would also let you phase it in over time, rather than spend a ton of money at once

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      The goal is to start making charging ubiquitous, so it will eventually be available to everyone. Let wealthy early adopters pay to build out the infrastructure and the market, so it will be everywhere ready to use

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      False, The used Chevrolet Bolt, Bolt EUV and Nissan Leaf EV’s are affordable and there are plenty of them on the market with low mileage.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        that’s not even mentioning the Chinease cards from manufactures like BYD (outside the US)

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Don’t they need to make it mandatory to increase capacity first? Most average residential streets probably dont have enough power to charge an EV on every address simultaneously.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Most average residential streets probably dont have enough power to charge an EV on every address simultaneously.

      [citation needed]

      I’m not saying you are wrong, but this sounds very much like a statement made definitively because it sounds like it might be true but has no particular basis in fact. I’d like to know if you have those facts.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is completely untrue. While there might be some streets unable to do this, it is definitely not most.

      A) This requires 20A charging, which is lower power draw than a normal electric dryer. Are you super concerned about houses having dryers? What about air conditioners? They pull literally 3 times the power. How can we possibly install air conditioners in every house?!?!

      B) The vast majority of these will be used late at night, when most electric draw is at a minimum (like air conditioners and dryers).

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Somewhat true but this won’t happen overnight and the power companies will upgrade capacity to meet the needs over time