• sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Many things people find despicable are common place in the fog of war. I will never agree with gunning down a poor person no matter what they did, justice is served for the poor daily on a cold lead plate. For the 1%??? Who can we call when insurance kills our loved ones? When Dr’s make intentional mistakes and your loved one is dead? Can you call the police and expect them to go snorkeling to find evidence? Or can you maybe expect a call in a few weeks with a maybe update? We have seen how they respond when one of their masters is murdered. Until there is actual justice for all citizens, there will be no peace. Eat the rich.

    • xenomor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly this. I suspect this group is both young enough to not have to supply their own insurance, or at least young enough to not have faced significant health costs yet. Many people have not yet experienced just how trash the US healthcare system is.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You better believe they skewed this poll to get the result they wanted

      I’m willing to bet that most people are indifferent, end of the remainder the vast majority are in support of the killing

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          If 19% don’t care, then it is acceptable to them.

          They are not upset it happened, they accept it. They do not explicitly support it tho.

          Add the 19% to 41% and get 60% do not have a problem with a broad daylight execution of a healthcare CEO.

          So if you want to be pedantic, email the person (or ai) that generated the headline.

          But 60% didn’t have a problem with it.

  • oakey66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not shocking if you’ve had to deal with any sort of healthcare in this god forsaken shithole of a country.

        • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are many young people (25 or younger) actually involved in their parents finances? How many parents would actually speak to their younger kids about their medical/health care issues?

          • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You should hope you never have to experience a parent suffer the health care system… mentally or physically. Assuming you’re not a monster you’d likely have a different opinion right now. It’s stupid to assume it’s like a parent telling a toddler how they file taxes…

            I saw my mother constantly get denied health care because her insurance wouldn’t cover her arthritis which was considered a “pre-existing condition”.

            I saw her suffer trying to get medication for migraines every month while Merck said nope.

            I saw democrats get rid of preexisting conditions with passage of ACA. I saw republicans lie about ACA claiming it’s economic demise…

            Demise never happened and republicans never once proposed anything better…

            So naturally…

            I saw my mom deny that any of this ever happened a few years later, that democrats never helped anyone and then she advocated for trump. I’ve seen her and others say democrats are the problem.

            I’ve seen a lot of weird shit…

          • oakey66@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            20+ year olds helping their parents navigate the healthcare hellscape is something that is actually fairly common. My mother-in-law is a hospital social worker.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Americans have been trained to wish on the CEO the negative things that those CEOs have caused.

    Game CEO cancels or ruins an anticipated game? Wish on to them that something they value gets canceled.

    Car company CEO makes cars more expensive? Wish upon them financial trouble.

    Social media CEO invades your privacy? Wish on them someone to track their plane wherever it flies.

    But there exists a subset of companies where death is the outcome of a bad CEO, and the end consequence of encouraging an eye for an eye is what we just saw. Perhaps if a company can decide whether you live or die, the government should play some role in it. Then at least voters will at least have a stake in the governance.

  • evilcultist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder how the terrorism charge affects things. Are people going to stop saying they support him out of fear or disgust? Will other people (and/or the government) go after people that say they support him because they can claim they’re supporting a terrorist? Will people become less affected by the word “terrorist” because it’s being applied in this way?

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s a wake up call, but it’s not really going to change anything. You want universal healthcare? We need a general strike. Shut everything down for a month and demand it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Rather then a general strike the perfect time to get it would have been voting for it in November. Even if everything shut down tomorrow, cities and towns burned, and people starved for months the GOP would spit on you.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If the DNC had a supermajority you can bet your ass we’d have single payer. We almost had it in 2010 but came up 1 vote short when an independent voted no alongside every single Republican.

          Republicans are so anti-public-healthcare that many of them want to gut medicaid, medicare, and often say things like supporting “Pure Privatization” and “get the government out of healthcare”.

          This is a clear partisan issue: DNC want it and GOP don’t want it.

              • AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                They won’t try lol. The Harris campaign made it quite clear that it wasn’t part of their platform. The Clinton campaign argued against it. The Biden campaign said something about a public option that wasn’t mentioned again after the election. The Dems did their best to stop any momentum Sanders had when he campaigned on single-payer.

                They don’t want to do it.

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Vote Dem or the people directly opposed to the thing you pretend to support win. Very easy choice. You should be supporting and promoting the Dems.

      • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If voting actually worked it would be illegal. It’s meaningless as long as the DNC Services Corp controls the controlled opposition party.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          lmao why would they even play pretend? We’ve seen other places in the world like China and Russia don’t face any consequences for being opaquely authoritarian and single party.

          You’re basically saying that US Democracy is fake and that swapping policy stances every 4 to 8 years is a big act? Whats the payoff?

          I think we can vote to get all of the things we care about but people are too stupid and easily mislead to try it.