jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comexternal-linkmessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkThe Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatwww.vox.comjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square134fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIt’s a federal law, and federal SCOTUS. there’s no reason why it wouldn’t.
minus-squareCorkyskog@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoIs there somewhere with more details? Also I meant non elected officials like purchasing officials.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoI know but if kickbacks are legal for the town mayor in federal law then it’s hard to see how they wouldn’t be legal for purchasing officials. The logic is that after the fact “gratuities” are just gifts.
It’s a federal law, and federal SCOTUS. there’s no reason why it wouldn’t.
Is there somewhere with more details?
Also I meant non elected officials like purchasing officials.
I know but if kickbacks are legal for the town mayor in federal law then it’s hard to see how they wouldn’t be legal for purchasing officials. The logic is that after the fact “gratuities” are just gifts.