• scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There are like 50 sentences of basic reality in there, but I suspect that a lot of the moderation challenge comes from one small phrase dropped into the middle: “it had to be done.”

      With the inclusion of that, the 50 sentences of reality are recast as not just true but a valid justification for murder, even an argument that it was a duty, and that’s the rub.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If only Thomas Jefferson had somehow managed to cap a member of English Royalty. Instead, then Jefferson crossed the pond to suck up to Louis XVI, shortly before the man went full Ropespierre’s Necktie.

    • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government and provide new guards for their future security.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, it’s not.

    It’s an acknowledgement that there’s a massive problem.

    These companies are literally willing to bankrupt you to death. Their behavior is inexcusable. They profiteer off of human suffering.

    We live in a country founded by people who were unhappy with the status quo and were willing to pick up a gun to change things. We shouldn’t act surprised that it still happens. I don’t think we should celebrate it, because it’s sad that this is happening in the first place, that someone feels they need to do this. This problem is solvable, and it can be solved civilly, or it will be solved uncivilly.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thats exactly how I feel “Its sad that this is looking like the solution”

      Like, it had to come to this? You couldnt just set up your little racket and keep the golden goose fat and happy? Or atleast adequately provided for and left alone?

    • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      We’re are explicitly given the right to bear arms as a check to tyrannical governance.

      Our government outsourced their tyranny to corporations.

      Corporations should be well aware of strings being attached.

  • Gemini24601@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone with half a brain can see that it isn’t “glorifying” violence, it’s merely giving an explanation of why Luigi did what he did. Glorification would play more into pathos, but the manifesto is mostly ethos

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      the most dangerous thing to a government isn’t the people. it’s not the external forces.

      it’s an idea so relatable to the public that the government loses containment of it and it spreads like fire in a grainery.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’ve always thought well educated people have a great potential to be dangerous and achieve transcendental goals if organized. A group of engineers, of chemists, physicists, biologists, computer scientists after specific goals may be formidable enemies if they wanted. The 0.001%, the dirty rich, should now be aware.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think I saw a report many years past that engineers make a bigger than expected proportion of radicalized people, in the context of middle east insurgencies.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Glorifying violence is A-Ok when the government awards people the Medal of Honor.

    Reddit needs to come up with a more accurate excuse for their censorship.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Their excuse is monnney. Look at Twitter, people are pulling their ads because they are not happy with what’s happening there. Keep the people who give you money happy and everything is fine. No matter if you would have to sell your soul (like Disney in China, to not get banned and miss millions of subscribers). Since the ad companies usually are big corporate, you can imagine what reddit their stance is.

    • x0chi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They must have some data that this time some thing is awakening against the corporate greed.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think federal government probably sent a pretty please over to reddit HQ to censor this.

    They’re afraid of it fomenting further dissent. It’s a delicate situation when the plebs are upset. A little bit is OK, in fact preferable. But too much can lead to a chain reaction that cannot be controlled.