• .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know, at face value he’s absolutely right. We shouldn’t claim care that is unnecessary or maybe even harmful. But where we disagree is that I think that decision should be left to our medical professionals

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really what it should be is that if a doctor prescribes unnecessary care, they should go after the doctor, not the patient. Doctors have malpractice insurance. If the health insurance can’t win a case of malpractice, then they should pay the bill. Why are patients in the midfle here at all.

      • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have sources, but I seem to recall reading somewhere that the OGs aged out or got caught, and the new gen that replaced them weren’t as ideologically driven or competent or something. I think they still technically exist but aren’t nearly as influential as they once were

        • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Another thought this just popped into my head is that the next generation may not have been brought up with the same fundamental hacking skills that were somewhat inherent in being technical in the late 70s-mid 90s. Could you still learn them?…Of course, but having grown up with BBSs and LoD (Legion of Doom, and the like) and pre-WWW, some things were just more prevalent when it came to learning about the guts of systems and “cybersecurity” (that word didn’t really exist back then).

        • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In this economy?!?! /s…kinda

          Actually that makes sense, and saddens me a bit there wasn’t a contingent to pass the torch to.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What did you expect?

    We’ve been told for years that herp derp the economy is doing amazing! If you don’t agree there’s something wrong with you! if you got laid off or your corpo landlord raised your rent and you’re now dying in the street well then… look everybody! An evil homeless person lowering your property values with their continued existence! Git em!

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s time for that green guy from that one video game that I can’t mention because the auto mods are erasing free speech

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we gamble on how long they have left?

    That’d be some good old fashioned capitalism.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that would be hilarious but no gambling site would allow it.

      the odds are too much in favor of the winners.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doug Stanhope used to run a celebrity death betting pool where you could bet on which celebrity would be the next to die.

        No idea if it was legal lol.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So many internet arguments revolve around binary choices that don’t need to be binary or appeals to authority or hypocrisy as the only leg they stand on.

  • motor_spirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    gonna put this dumb mother fucker on an airbrushed tee like he’s already dead

    chalk yourself out ya big dumb bastard, show the sharks where that menstrual leak is bitch-made mf

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, I’ve had doctors pad the bill. I’m lucky enough to have decent insurance and I have a few stories about doctors taking advantage of that.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      so does that make it ok for healthcare providers to deny coverage for procedures or medication that has been prescribed due to an illness or ailment impacting a patients quality of life?

      • Hikermick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it doesn’t but I can understand why they don’t greenlight everything. This all is a glaring example why we need single payer health care and doctors that earn a flat rate and not get paid per procedure (there is a name for this, i don’t know it).

        • nieminen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s self fulfilling though. Doctors offices are at the whims of their agreements with the insurance companies to stay afloat. They pad the bill (charging maximum for everything) because the insurance company will only pay percentages on most procedures. Then they usually write off the rest (or close to it). Doctors are incentivized to prescribe certain drugs over others, and other such meddling.

          Healthcare costs are as high as they are specifically because of private insurance. The evidence is in every single other developed country that has state-provided healthcare. It’s overall cheaper, and often better.

          Insurance companies default to denying claims because they know, if the barrier is high enough (denial after denial), people will simply stop asking for the procedure (or whatever), so they don’t have to pay anything. Then their earnings go up, and they pad their pockets.

          • Hikermick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            To say “insurance company bad” oversimplifies the problem. That’s why it’s foolish to base opinions on memes. Where there’s lots of money, greedy people will find a way to get at it or as I like to say “shit attracts flies”. In my work I deal with private companies that are paid with public dollars. What I see going on has jaded me hardcore. Publicly funding the health care system will be a disaster without overhauling the whole system.

            • nieminen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t disagree with you. We can’t simply replace insurance companies with a public version and expect everything to be okay. But Medicare and Medicaid seem to work really well for a lot of people. They can simply expand it, and then private insurance can still exist as a supplement if someone wants.

              But what we really need is more regulation, everywhere, on almost all industries.

              Gotta kill citizens United, and make superpacs illegal. When money gets out of politics, is when we’ll finally see some change.