• MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reality ia amazing but to value our blissful existence we have to go through a simulation of how horrible the exitance could be. I for exemple am incredibly happy in reality but Taylor swift is an 1 eye, no arms, Afgan orfan in reality… Or just reality Mcdonalds employeeq

  • randomdeadguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Creators don’t have to be all-knowing. Also, because believing this reality is a simulation does not change the rules we live by, there is no difference between the life of a sim-denier and sim-believer. It’s not as if you’d be punished just for [redacted].

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    My best guess: The thought processes required to ponder the possibility of a simulation are too important to the goal of the simulation itself to disable.

  • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we’re in a simulation, it’s probably a massive universe-spanning one. We’re just a blip, both within the scale of the space of the universe and within the history of time of the universe. In that case, we’re not important enough for a simulation creator to even care to adjust our capabilities at all. They’re not watching us. We’re not the point of the simulation.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So instead of a simulation, maybe we’re living inside of some other type of thing we’re hard-wired to be unable to even think of—and maybe “simulation” is the idea we’re hard-wired to replace it with.

  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not like my Conway’s Game of Life creatures can ever escape their petri dish. I’m so zoomed out that I wouldn’t even notice if they were intelligent.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because we’re living in a simulation doesn’t mean we are simulated. So perhaps the architects of the simulation can’t simply program our questions away.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s probably a bug.

    Fuck, if we’re in a simulation I’d be most amazed that nobody has managed to trigger a null pointer exception to crash the whole thing yet.

    Oh, also, infinite recursion… and we got so close with https://youtu.be/xz6OGVCdov8

  • tonyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe our types of thoughts are so primitive compared to them that they can’t even imagine that we’d have them.

  • jBlight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Life isn’t as fun if you have all the answers. You’ll lose the opportunity for growth.

  • Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Movie rights. Were something like bitcoin. Our ideas generate value to the creators. The more in-sim value that’s created, so it extends to the creators. Mirrors are to blame, you see. Whichever creator allows mirrors to exist in-sim nearly destroyed the sim the first time a “person” stood between two mirrors and saw their infinite reflection. The immediate fix was to allow the concept of infinite universes and sim life.