Kennedy’s statements also raise the remarkable specter that the man who could soon lead the Department of Health and Human Services believes that the department may have carried out a “sinister” scheme to “enslave” its own citizens—and that this scheme was implemented under the leadership of Donald Trump, the very person who has now chosen Kennedy for the HHS post.
I guess the only problem Kennedy really had with the claim is that he wasn’t in on it.
“The policies are coming from inside the house!”
I think Dick Cheney beat him to it.
A file with damaging information about Gaetz?
Isn’t that like… any news article covering him?
It’s a metric scale—just use centimoochies.
So who leaked the fight about the leaks?
One of the people most often cited in Democratic circles as a possibility for DNC chair is Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler.
I wasn’t familiar with Wikler—but after looking over his bio he seems like a surprisingly solid choice, with ties to Aaron Swartz, Al Franken, Larry Lessig, Russ Feingold, MoveOn, and The Onion.
(And I do think the Onion is relevant—it shows an understanding of messaging, and of appealing to wide audiences.)
Turns out the US healthcare system actually has an advantage for once: people can’t misuse antibiotics if they can’t afford them in the first place.
That was my first thought: I’m not really familiar with the content of any influencers, but I assume the best of them are better than the worst of the more conventional news sources.
Someone who can’t comprehend men and women working together in combat is someone who can’t comprehend working with women.
Uncle Tom had his issues, but he was the opposite of hateful.
If the AT protocol allows public access to content, they can’t create a proprietary training set. But the content is available for anyone who wants to add it to a public training set.
Support for slavery before the Civil War
Carter’s airline deregulation
Clinton’s welfare “reform” and NAFTA
Obama’s finance sector bailout
Biden blocking a national rail strike
Biden has appointed three Latinos to his Cabinet, and Obama had five. (Trump’s previous administration had one—the Secretary of Labor.)
I think the controversy with Rubio isn’t that he’s Latino, it’s that he advocates for a more interventionist foreign policy.
Prehistoric people leaving things in caves is practically the only way we still know about them, but that doesn’t mean humans normally hung out in caves as a permanent lifestyle. We have evidence of people making wooden structures in Africa long before the first cave paintings—and compared to structures, caves would have been cold and dark, unlikely to be conveniently located, and contested for by cave-adapted animals.
It’s because the caves were so shitty that subsequent people left them untouched for tens of thousands of years.
Is it part of the joke that the logo for “Global Tetrahedron” is actually a dodecahedron?
If it’s really just a matter of too many candidates, could they increase the number of signatures needed to get on the ballot?
My city (Oakland) has ranked-choice voting for mayor and city council, and (as far as I’m aware) doesn’t have a similar issue with under-voting.
Was there another factor besides the number of candidates on the ballot (e.g., no candidate statements in voter guides, or an ad campaign against ranked voting)?
If they genuinely don’t have a preference, is it a bad thing if they refrain from effectively voting at random?
(Currently relevant to anyone on the northern US west coast.)