• Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This add-on is not actively monitored for security by Mozilla. Make sure you trust it before installing.

    It’s pretty lame that Mozilla’s addons site still doesn’t show source code which is guaranteed to correspond to the binary you’re installing.

    Anyway, I went and read the source on github (which probably corresponds to the extension one can install) and while this part seems very straightforward this other part exceeds my understanding 😂 (i’m not suggesting it is malicious, i just don’t understand everything it is doing there or why it is necessary).

    What I was really looking at the source for was to see if they were simulating keystrokes (and inserting plausible delays between them) to defeat a more determined anti-pasting adversary, or if they were simply suppressing the hostile website’s onPaste handler so that pastes can happen as normal. And: they are doing the latter.

    I wonder if any paste-blocking websites detect and defeat this extension yet?

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    7 days ago

    OMFG what asshole came up with the idea of blocking paste for fields? Whoever you are, get FUCKED

    • irish_link@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      7 days ago

      “bUt ItS a SeCuRiTy RiSk.” Yeah maybe when most people were keeping their passwords in a spreadsheet. However now that they are all encrypted in password management programs its a vulnerability. If I can’t generate a 40+ char password for your site then I will not be using your site if I can help it.

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Or even better: the ones that add bullshit like “–Copied from shitheads.xyz” to all copied text

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        In mst cases it’s a simple css property.

        Btw, can webdevs please stop reimplementing scroll via js? Always a slow and buggy mess.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Those same people think that colorblind people don’t exist and there’s no accessibility reason to select text. 😡

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Don’t fuck with copy too, my schools e-textbook thing won’t let you copy text when quoting it for an essay.

    Edit: I appreciate the help but this is on a school laptop, we can’t install anything nor open inspect element. Also I already found a workaround by cntrl+c-ing before I lift the left click and it goes to highlight mode.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      California DMV requires a bank routing and account number instead of a credit card, but doesn’t allow you to copy and paste it from your bank website. You have to type out the 20+ digits and if you get any of them wrong a cop pulls you over and potentially murders you.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    There’s a special place in hell for whoever started that blocking paste shit, right next to the popup ad guy.

    Also, does anyone know of an Android Xposed/Magisk Module that does the same thing?

  • villainy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    Now give me a “Don’t Fuck With Back” extension.

    I’m guessing it’s all from the same ad network but I’ve noticed an uptick in the number of sites hijacking the back button to show more ads. Even the Associated Press site has been doing it and it drives me crazy.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Does this work with any text on page (vs just inputs)?

    Currently dealing with several digital textbooks - that I fucking purchased - from Elsevier that disable copy functions, which makes pulling chunks of text from a page to take notes a pain in the ass. I’ve resorted to just using the snipit tool to capture tiny screenshots of the text I want, but that’s ofc significantly less ideal than just highlighting text and hitting Ctrl+C.

    • hactar42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      There is a Firefox extension called Absolute Enable Right Click & Copy that works great for a lot sites that block you from being able to copy.

      • BenLeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        That sounds right up my alley because another pet peeve of mine is when they block me from opening an image in a new tab via the right click menu. My eyes aren’t what they used to be and I need to ZOOM sometimes.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Okay that actually sounds pretty amazing… but I can’t get it to work. Win+shift+T seems to just cycle through the icons pinned in my taskbar. I’ll do some googling to see if I can figure out why that is, but if you know a quick fix, then yes please!!

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just thought of a possible bypass. Maybe a phone’s “scan document” function can help with that? Provided that the text is clear, you may be able to scan a webpage and save it as a scanned document. Then open the doc on your phone (or other device), and you should be able to highlight and copy the scanned text.

      Okay, maybe not. I tested it with this very page and although the copied text got the gist, I still would’ve had to go back and edit things. But eh, YMMV. It could be a valid work-around for somebody, just with different text or using a different device.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Usually I just leave them as little image blocks of text cuz ain’t nobody got time for dat. When I actually do want to fully convert it (usually only bother if I’m sending something out to the class), then I’ll save the whole doc as a PDF and then run it through an optical character recognition service like this one. There are ways, they just suck when a feature like copy exists.

      • essteeyou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        If you want to cheat on a typing speed test you may as well just make up a number and say that’s your WPM. Why take a test at all?

      • cuerdo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        a lot of people mistyping their passwords, and then not knowing their password, I assume

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Just not allowing the clipboard is a legitimate security measure though. A lot of apps can read that memory space, so it’s kind of a security black hole.l