• Synapse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Let’s compare the update process when you want to shutdown your computer:

        Windows:

        1. Doesn’t leave you the choice: your getting updated now, deal with it
        2. Starts to update
        3. Reboots, update for 2 minutes (wasn’t that bad)
        4. Reboots again, updates for 15 minutes (come on man, I’m gonna miss my train !)
        5. Reboots AGAIN ! continue and eventually finishes the update
        6. Shutdown

        Fedora:

        1. We have downloaded updates, do you want to Install them before shutdown?
        2. Not this time, thank you
        3. Shutdown Or if you do let it install, reboots always just once, updates 2 minutes, done.

        If you have disk encryption or bitlocker, you just can’t let the PC update unattended. Not knowing how many times windows needs to reboot for this update is hella annoying.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I shutdown on windows without updating all the time. Not sure where you’re getting no choice from.

        • Aganim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago
          1. Doesn’t leave you the choice: your getting updated now, deal with it

          Interesting, my W11 allows me the choice between ‘Shutdown’ and ‘Update and shutdown’. I’ve never had it force an update on me.

          For the other points: are you still running Windows on spinning rust or something? I’ve never seen update take longer than a few minutes at most. And why are you waiting for Windows to do its thing? Choose ‘Update and Shutdown’ and go catch that train.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Only time I have no choice is when I’ve been putting that update off, and off, and off, for a while. I see that little orange dot but I either ignore it, or I snooze it, or whatever. And one day windows is like all right dude, you gotta do this, let’s go.

          • Synapse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Maybe I don’t get choice because it’s the laptop provided by my company for work. It’s not old rust, it’s new from this year and has 32GB or RAM and and SSD and a rather powerful CPU. It is fucking slow to do anything tho ! My older laptop still had windows 10 and would take 30s to boot up, this new one takes 5 to 10 minutes ! Just open a Excel sheet takes 45 seconds…

            • Aganim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Could be they enforce the update process through policies, while annoying that is not a bad thing perse. On my Linux machine I can run an ancient kernel, leaky libraries and all kinds of vulnerable software and my employer would be none the wiser. Everybody is responsible for maintaining their own machine, no matter if they run Windows or Linux. That’s the other side of the spectrum and pretty bad from a security perspective, in all honesty.

              Your slowness could be caused by BitLocker being enabled on an SSD not supporting hardware encryption, causing Windows to do the encryption in software mode. That uses the CPU for encryption and can drastically reduce performance. Might be worth checking out, with those specs Windows really should not be slow.

      • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        it was an odd choice for fedora to default to reboots for system updates. I can dnf update to avoid it but I keep forgetting.

        I think they’re preparing everyone for immutable installations but they’re a long way off from that.

        • madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          When the kernel is updated, a reboot is necessary to load the new version. Improvements and security fixes aren’t implemented until a reboot. Services and daemons likewise need restart to ensure they’re working. When libraries are updated (OpenSSL or Gnutls for example), they might get run with the wrong version of an application.

        • auzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not really.

          There is a good reason Windows does it.

          To guarantee the running state of the system, and to ensure everything runs using the components and versions they were designed to use

            • auzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Cool. You do that

              Are you going to install multiple versions of every library?

              What if it’s a security fix and it’s in issue in your desktop environment, etc

              Coreutils and glibc aren’t the only libraries on your system

              Some apps might use static linking too so might need to be restarted. Other libraries might be loaded long after the app is started. If you swap libraries half way, it’s not great too

              What if you’re copying large files half way and run out of space. That nuked my Linux mint install

              Linux distros don’t just copy Windows. They wouldn’t put in the extra effort unless they have to.

              Do you think a bunch of developers sit around and don’t evaluate why they’re doing things? And instead just copy from Windows? Nah mate. They do it for a reason

              The cool thing about doing it this way is if boot fails, you can rollback easily too. If you’re installing core components randomly, your system might only fall to boot a week later

  • BuckWylde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Having the control over your system at least gives you the full ability to tweak things. I’ve been daily driving you know what for a couple of years now and have had no breaks even with multiple updates per week. It does the usual web browsing, listening to music, and gaming on Steam with no problems whatsoever.

    • Batman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was absolutely gobsmacked that I could play hogwartz on the platform which must not be named. If it can play this game…

      • madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It worked back when I tried it, but I didn’t finish (or even play long) to confirm fully. Trail Out was impossible to complete when I tried it. -Stuck me half way through the game with an unbeatable time trial. -Wasted hours on it, beat it first try in Windows. (One of many reasons I try to protect normies from evangelists)

        -Respect!

    • madthumbs@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Often those ‘tweaks’ are bogus or not worth your time, often resulting in worse performance and higher maintenance. -Also something normies wouldn’t bother with. That said, it’s fine to post benchmark results comparing your before and after here if you wish.

      Intention is to protect normies. Hobbyist use doesn’t bother me. Hope you understand.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only problem I’ve bumped into with that is that the “python” command doesn’t work out of box on most newer Linux machines. It definitely doesn’t take hours nor any repairs to install “python3-is-python” and get that working either (if I care).

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Try using outdated tools with deprecated dependencies, and then those deprecated dependencies need old versions of libs you have the newer versions installed.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean I’ve done a thing or two but honestly the worst problem I’ve had in recent years is trying to get a flatpak to work in Linux mint / newest Ubuntu because something about Qt had changed.

            For the most part it works, without the ads, unlike the “competition”. I also get an advantage in that it’s basically a native thing for me at this point, so I’m better than a lot of my co-workers at using it (which is inevitable because Linux is basically the entire Internet).

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t have to, OP. You could just accept those defaults as they are and enjoy the system.

    Yeah, I didn’t think so.