• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Are you fucking kidding? Because Biden 2020 was a progressive platform and Harris 2024 was a centrist one. They weren’t even remotely similar. Biden may be a centrist, but he’s very pro-labor, and he could see how important the progressive base was that election, so he literally sat down with Sanders and hammered out a platform that they could get behind. And while I’ve got a lot of problems with Joe Biden, he actually was very committed to that platform. He really wanted BBB to get through and he kept trying to find ways to abolish student debt.

    Harris, on the other hand, had a handful of disparate, vaguely left policy positions, like the first-time homebuyer’s credit and legalizing pot, but her campaign was mainly centered on economic opportunity for the middle class. She also committed wholeheartedly to the most right-wing polices of the Biden administration, like arming Israel and cracking down on the border. But worst of all, she made bipartisanship and Republican consensus a huge part of her campaign, promising to add Republicans to her cabinet , campaigning with Liz Cheney, and even praising Dick Fucking Cheney.

    TL;DR, Biden campaigned like Obama in 2008, Harris Campaigned like Hillary in 2016. And the results were the same.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Do you even remember 2020? Nobody fucking wanted Biden. He was never progressive. He was literally mocked for telling donors “Nothing will fundamentally change.” People turned out because of how much they hated Trump.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        That actually occurred in 2019, not 2020. After Bernie nearly stomped him in the primary, he made a hard pivot to the left in 2020. As I said, he’s a centrist, but he actually does have a strong history of pro-union activism, which made him a fairly credible (though imperfect) messenger for a populous platform.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        12 days ago

        I sure did. I was genuinely hopeful when Biden stepped down, and when they announced Walz, I actually got excited. Then they started to try and reach moderate Republicans more and more, and I slowly realized they were doing it again. I felt like I was going insane watching them repeat the strategy that caused them to lose to the same guy in 2016.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        I do what I can. If the question had been asked in good faith, I might have even been nice about it.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Don’t forget that Biden was the first president to walk a picket line. No other president had ever done that in America’s history. That single action won over the UAW.

      Then, Biden fought back against the railroad corporations and won a contract for workers that includes PTO and other basic labor necessities.

      Then, Biden reduced fentanyl overdoses, something that no president has done in like 30-40 years.

      Couple this with BBB and IRA, you have a much more progressive president than what people give water to it.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, I don’t want to give him too much credit. Biden is and always has been a centrist. He has a mixed history on Civil Rights (cause he’s 120 years old), he has a pretty pro-bank history, he’s supported some anti-consumer stuff (like the anti-bankruptcy laws), and he even helped put Clarence Thomas on the bench. And that’s not even touching on his administration, where Gaza and the border will probably be his lasting legacy. But, two things that he’s always been pretty consistent on were unions and infrastructure, and he read the room in 2020 and leaned heavily into those things.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Oh I agree. He likely made all of those concessions because 1) he wanted to rally the base following the 2020 primaries, and 2) to stick it to the establishment Dems. Seems like Biden has grown to be quite the grumpy old man to those in the party.

          I agree with you in Gaza and the border. Biden has shown no backbone to Netanyahu, and his administration introduced a border bill that echoed a lot of Trump’s sentiments.

          On the whole, it’s hard to make the call on whether Biden or Harris would have been better to run against Trump, but all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

          Hasan Piker put it well the other day. If this were a game of sports, underperformers would be benched pretty aggressively. If this were a job, underperformers would be put on a performance plan (hopefully) or fired straight up.

          There are people consulting Democrats that have failed time and again since 2016, hell even 2008. They need OUT.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

            100% this. On Monday, I’m calling my state and federal representatives and telling them DNC chair Jamie Harrison needs to go. Then I’m gonna start looking for movements that will primary anyone who still thinks incrementalism and centrism are a path forward. From now on, Medicare for All and UBI need to be the bare minimum standard for anyone that wants a D in front of their name.