• inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I mean if Europe wants to increase their military funding and move items in house I think that would be a wonderful idea. Because America is not a reliable partner in this at all in the past two decades.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      15 days ago

      If Europe gets into a war of course the US will help. But the same can’t really be said if the US gets into a war. The rest of NATO needs to be able to hold the fort if the US were to get suddenly …distracted in the Pacific

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        If Europe gets into a war of course the US will help.

        How sure are you of that? Sure, if Russia marches towards the Atlantic Ocean, but if Russia decides to create a security buffer zone in Finland? Or the Baltic countries?

        NATO has only survived for as long because of the commitment of the US. Come January NATO is dead as well as a sovereign Ukraine.

  • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    It seems like a very real possibility. A new, EU followup seems like a natural next step to protect the borders and peace.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 days ago

    NATO will kick us to the curb and rise to the challenge. We will need them one day and they will say no.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    It isn’t credible now. It likely won’t exist at all in 4 years. Unless it cedes even more decision making authority to the US and becomes even more of a puppet.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    The biggest thing will be all those nato countries who can’t do anything with their US weapons if the US says so.

    • ziggurat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      That is only if they want to continue to buy new weapons, not if they intend to male weapons in Europe

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        No. I mean the weapons they have now. F35 for example. If a war happens in Europe, will those planes be useful without US support and authorizations? US can do a lot of harm to Europe with that.

        • ziggurat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yes let me explain my answer I didn’t elaborate properly.

          I think the only recourse the US has if European countries use these weapons without authorization is that the US will not sell more weapons.

          And if Europe continues to intreases it’s weapon and ammunition production like they have the last two years that might not be a deal breaker for Europe

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            I’m not sure Europe can make F35 parts for example, which will not fly for long without it, or ammunitions for various US weapons. I hope it’ll be a wake up call to make and use EU instead.

        • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          That sword cuts both ways. The F-35 has parts from all over the US and EU. This doesn’t extend to every weapon system, but if the US refuses to support F-35s, their own F-35s would lose support too.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    calling the shots in europe is part of the us strategy to perpetuate imperialism. nato wont go anywhere.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    NATO hasn’t been credible since they helped the US perpetrate a brutally violent colonialist pity party in Afghanistan.

  • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t think NATO is in any danger. Trump has a very aggressive and bombastic style of negotiation. You saw this with NAFTA. Trump called it the worst agreement in the history of the world. But the USMCA is just NAFTA with a new acronym and now it’s apparently the BEST trade agreement in the history if the world. Its the same with Trump and NATO. The Europeans are the worst freeloaders in the history of the universe…until they up their defense spending by half a percentage point to appease the Donald, and then NATO will be the best alliance ever. Typical bombastic bullshit.

  • RubicTopaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    Love the implication that the shitty imperialist anglo organization was ever credible.

  • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Now watch red maga walk back on that too, like all of blue/red maga promises.

    The only good thing that could’ve possibly come out of this, and it won’t even happen.