No.250341473
>fantasy setting has magic and flying creatures
>still using horses as main transportation

No.250341651
>>250341473 (OP) #
>setting has nuclear energy
>still using coal as main energy source

    • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There are positives and negatives to both platforms. Lemmy has an abundance of information about Linux and memes about Star Trek but misses out on literature discussion and completely lacks the ability to recognize sarcasm. 4chan is a concentrated discussion hub where every interaction is seen and evaluated, but occasionally it hosts a slight hint of bigotry.

  • thechadwick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You would just not believe the regulatory burden of maintaining magical creature flying safety regime too.

    You drop a simple glove off directing and 30min later, boom. You’ve got a gnome commission setting up barriers around it and paperwork for weeks to come…

  • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    There’s a lot of hidden costs and infrastructure needed for magical flying beasts. Not to mention limited capacity. Little can compete with the horse drawn cart when it comes to capacity for price though.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Boats beat out horse drawn carts by an insane amount.

      It’s why trade hubs and major cities were practically always on a major river and/or in a favourable location for a port.

      • spookex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Didn’t know that capitalism made people blow the miniscule dangers of nuclear power out of proportion and create irrational fear

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The by now miniscule risk of meltdown is not the only downside to nuclear power compared to renewables.

          There’s the fact that a nuclear power plant takes a decade or more to build and make operational and we need to replace fossil fuel energy production NOW. In comparison, gigantic solar arrays and wind turbine parks can be ready in a matter of months.

          Then there’s the nuclear waste. There’s been discovered one truly forever safeplace to store it in the world, deep down into a mountain in Finland (afair, could be Norway). Even if we (unreasonably) assume that it can all fit there, transporting all the radioactive waste of a world reliant on nuclear energy to Finland would be an environmentally ruinous nightmare.

          Lastly, nuclear reactors need cool water to function efficiently and safely. Global warming, the very thing proponents say they’re the best solution for, is making nuclear plants less effective and less safe.

          In conclusion, renewables are by far the best solution, not nuclear energy.

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fall off a horse -> dust yourself off and get back on. There’s a whole idiom about how falling off horses is a frustrating but ultimately minor inconvenience.

    Fall off a gryphon -> you are dead.