• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s nonsense to assume that every vote for Stein in 2016 would have voted for Clinton. Most exit polls showed that people who voted for Stein or Johnson would not have voted in the first place. Hillary was a losing candidate from the start.

    • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Nobody ever claimed “everybody”, just the “enough”, and the data actually reflects that. Even if they didn’t vote, Clinton would’ve won.

      I voted for Stein for 2016 (before we knew what we know now), and I voted for Howie Hawkins in 2020. But then I lived in New York, and I knew my vote wouldn’t matter, so I could vote my conscience without threatening the concept of democracy. This year I am in Florida, and I damn well fucking know I’m gonna vote for Kamala Harris and a straight democratic ticket below that. Because I understand the consequences of my actions.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Logically, yeah.

        But if these voters were logical they would realize the issue with FPTP voting systems and not fuck with 3rd parties in the first place.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nader is a mich better example. If 99% of the Florida Nader voters had stayed home and the remaining 1% voted for Gore, he would have won even with the Supreme Court’s decision to stop the recount.

    • Zanudous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Imagine supporting a political party so unappealing to a majority of the population, that you resort to blaming them when you don’t win.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Trump was appealing enough to win. Was it that he was actually good or are a good portion of voters just fucking idiots?

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It is harder to get the bothsidesing done if you think of Repubs as having agency and responsibility for their actions, instead of believing only Dems do. Dems as a collective are also all as bad as their worst member, whom they are all actively colluding with. Repubs are just a few bad apples so we can interpret their actions individually.

          Weak ACA is the Dems’ fault, Citizens United is the Dems’ fault, Donald is the Dems’ fault, Dobbs is the Dems’ fault, Chevron is the Dems’ fault.

    • Antagnostic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      This tbh, if we don’t want Green votes, make better reasons to them to vote the way you want them to vote. They vote green because they don’t agree with the other candidates. They should fix that instead of complaining about it.

        • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 month ago

          Bro the overly repetitive usage of that word won’t guarantee you the votes, and worst, may even deter people from voting

          • Grebes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            By most definitions (some require national malitia backing) it’s fascism. Why mince words or pretend the current rhetoric isn’t following the exact same route as previous iterations?

          • Grebes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Fascism is fascism, not sure what you are on about. A vote for Trump or Jill is just a vote for genocide here with the rhetoric the right is currently spouting. But I guess fuck trans rights, immigrants, the climate, and the economy because your hill to die on is peace in the Middle East. JFC

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I agree. Voting for Jill will fund the trashcan with one ballot. So I guess I’ll have to take the advice of Uncommitted and vote Harris because I am against Donald instead of for Harris.

              • davidagain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Why do you think Donald “finish them” “best King of Israel” “Biden is trying to hold Netanyahu back, he should be doing the opposite” Trump would be better for Gaza, or how do you think anyone other than Harris or Trump could become president, or how do you think that letting Trump win absolves you of complicity? Inaction is a moral choice, and it’s not like you haven’t been warmed that Trump is today the most fascist candidate this close to the presidency in our lifetimes.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s literally not actually. All political ideologies are capable of genocide when taken to extremes, and many have done so. Colonial America, Stalinist Russia, too many absolute monarchies to count…none of those were fascist, but they were genocidal. We associate genocide with fascism because of the Holocaust, but they’re two different concepts.