Senior Democrats in US cities are preparing to defend their communities in the event of Donald Trump’s return to the White House after the former president has repeated threats that he would use presidential powers to seize control of major urban centers.

Trump has proposed deploying the military inside major cities largely run by Democrats to deal with protesters or to crush criminal gangs. He has threatened to dispatch large numbers of federal immigration agents to carry out mass deportations of undocumented people in so-called “sanctuary” cities.

He also aims to obliterate the progressive criminal justice policies of left-leaning prosecutors.

“In cities where there has been a complete breakdown of law and order … I will not hesitate to send in federal assets including the national guard until safety is restored,” Trump says in the campaign platform for his bid to become the 47th US president, Agenda47.

Trump provoked uproar earlier this week when he called for US armed forces to be deployed against his political rivals – “the enemy within” – on election day next month. But his plans to use national guard troops and military personnel as a means to attack those he sees as his opponents go much wider than that, spanning entire cities with Democratic leadership.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    No not ‘‘at risk’’. This is his NUMBER ONE policy promise. He’s running on this. Explicitly. Why are we pretending it’s not?

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    mass deportations of undocumented people

    I feel like this is something that won’t really happen. Despite conservative rhetoric and posturing about closed borders, the reality is that major parts of our economy - like agriculture, meat packing, restaurants and construction - are utterly dependent on undocumented immigrant labor. Mass deportations would be insanely difficult to actually achieve, and would cause enormous economic upheaval, what with the fact that fucking food and housing are apparently important to people. Not to say that conservatives would really give a shit about that, but the people hiring all these undocumented workers and exploiting their cheap labor are generally conservative and wouldn’t want their cash cows disrupted.

    On the other hand, I didn’t think they would really do anything much about abortion either, since that’s such a major thing to fire their base up about. I should probably never underestimate their willingness to destroy the whole country in order to hurt what passes for the Left here.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      I should probably never underestimate their willingness to destroy the whole country in order to hurt what passes for the Left here.

      I think we should take them at their word. They are insane enough to do a wide variety of terrible things and ruin the country. As far as their rich backers go, everyone thinks they can control the monster they’ve unleashed until it’s too late.

    • baru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel like this is something that won’t really happen.

      Similar things were said about abortion.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh that’s actually the easiest part. We are very very good at logistics in the US. The hard part about deportation in the past has been the red tape, like court hearings and moving people around to different agencies depending on their exact case details.

      They don’t want to deal with any of that. They want the Proud Boys to grab your non English speakers and put them into a short term camp. There will be no checking of papers for naturalization or anything like that. If you’re not white and you can’t speak English well they’ll take you, and they will ignore any lawyer, court, or law enforcement orders to stop. From the camp you’ll be put on a chartered flight to wherever they think you’re from with a “Do Not Return” note on your travel documents.

      The truly scary part is what happens when they find out other countries won’t just accept American citizens. But they’re imagining Operation Wetback, not anything from the Bush or Reagan era.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You do not execute orders that aren’t moral. The US Military is not like the Russians. Although, I wouldn’t depend completely on that.

    • ovalofsand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t believe anyone is perfectly immune from propaganda but I don’t even know if you need propaganda to get people to follow orders. All you need is someone to give the order. There isn’t any Morality In following orders. That’s why they’re called soldiers

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not just propaganda, but threats against them or their job. I’d be willing to bet that they wouldn’t threaten their families, I couldn’t imagine that turning out well.

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Stanfrod prison experiment proved pretty amply that people will follow orders and adopt other peoples sadism as their own when directed to do so by an authority figure. Nurembourg was largely a propoganda show.

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It was originally supposed to have tried more like 15000, but yes, ultimately a low couple hundred were tried, and then the rest were just dropped. Theres interesting history there, and it functioned more like propoganda than justice.

  • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    A military takeover of the cities would last about 20minutes, if that, it’s against the HOA rules.

    What happens when the wealthy home owners see their property values drop, because the army is on every corner, they’ll start calling their political reps.

    This is a childish fantasy, the highest real estate values are in cities, the wealthiest people have homes in cities. It is a fantasy of the Republic base, that tends not to live in large urban centers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      You know he means the downtown core, not the suburban white people who likely voted for him. But I gave you an upvote for the hilarity of an HOA council member telling the Proud Boys they aren’t allowed to setup there.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh, I’m sure they could deploy in a way that has acceptable optics for those folks. They would see a strong violent force there to enforce their interests over those pesky desperate poors.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      So much suffering. That was so avoidable. I like that the point of movie isn’t which ideology wins. It’s that America isn’t immune, any civil war will be a very dirty affair that causes massive amounts of suffering so nobody should be rooting for that path.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    US military personnel pledge an oath to protect the US Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies and that includes the Commander-in-Chief.

  • Gumby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    But the constitution forbids the US military from operating within the borders of the US! Surely that’ll stop him from ever being able to do this! Right? Right???

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Possibly? One might be able to make the case for the National Guard, but maybe the average person won’t know/care about the difference when interacting with armed people in uniform.

      Aside from that, I’ve noticed other Lemmings bring up the fact that the Armed Forces in general are sworn to uphold the US Constitution. As an organization, they may disregard orders that are in conflict with this. Of course, that comes down to interpretation of any individual in command, so despite loud protest to the contrary I personally wouldn’t rely on that.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        As an organization, they may disregard orders that are in conflict with this. Of course, that comes down to interpretation of any individual in command, so despite loud protest to the contrary I personally wouldn’t rely on that.

        This is going to make me throw up a little, but I think the command leadership in recent years has really turned a heel on political alignment. And - hurk - I feel like they would do the honorable thing. You’re not wrong though, obviously the military attracts right wing shit heads who believe what they want. So I would imagine that there would be a breakdown of the command at lower levels in scant instances; but brigade, division, corps, and post commanders usually follow rigorous and strict guidelines. Values are a big deal. But brainworm has been feeding on dumb dumbs and it doesn’t appear to be starving any time soon.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The paper won’t stop him but the officer corps isn’t going to obey those orders without him converting it first. A process that historically takes years to complete and leaves a military a shadow of it’s former self.

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds like he’s promoting firing up civil war tbh. How much of that could he get away with before people aggressively fight back? Or at least I hope we’d aggressively fight back

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Trump loses the elections, US cities at risk of stochastic violence and domestic terrorism. It’s not like Harris winning would suddenly make half the country go, “my bad, you’re right.”

  • ThatOneKrazyKaptain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    With the current info on Undecideds, it’s lining up mostly with what I guessed based on what we knew about the locked in voters barring another polling disaster rendering all the data moot. Around 60% of the recent undecideds have broke for Harris, but the bulk of Undecideds who committed earlier broke for Trump (52-48) which is a larger number. These two average out to basically 50-50 on the whole. Undecideds went massively for Trump both previous elections so I don’t foresee Harris breaking 50%ish, that’s already a big gain.

    This is relevant because the final locked in scores at the rate things are trending are going to be something like 47.5 - 49 give or take a half a point by election day. Not all of the 3-4 points left are going to either them, at least one, maybe 2 are going for Third Parties, which unlike in past years are way more left leaning than normal thanks mostly to RFK Jr and Libertarian infighting. Harris is trending in the right direction, but that 3rd party shift absorbs some of that. A final 50/50 call between what’s left leaves maybe a 2 point difference final result depending on exactly how well third parties do. 48-50 or so. That’s a Hilary Clinton sized margin between Popular Vote and EC. Not a death sentence, this thing is cyclical, sometimes it favors one party or another (Democrats had a EC advantage in 2004 and 2008 and probably 2012) and sometimes it’s stronger. The effect is supposed to be much less this year, a Biden level margin of 4 points or even a 3 point lead is a safe Kamala win. Not so much 2 points, that’s up in the margins.

    If the polling is right, this is a dead heat election where Wisconsin and Michigan are going blue, Arizona Georgia and North Carolina going red, and Nevada and Pennsylvania are too close to call.