There are 1.65 trillion barrels of proven oil reserves in the world as of 2016.

The world has proven reserves equivalent to 46.6 times its annual consumption levels. This means it has about 47 years of oil left (at current consumption levels and excluding unproven reserves).

This means that the oil is going to run out in our lifetime

Source/more reading: https://www.worldometers.info/oil/

Update: It is infact not true (or just partially true), because it only considers already known oil reserves that can be pumped out with current technology.

There is more oil that can potentially be used as technology and infrastructure advances, so the estimate of 50 years is wrong.

For the correction thanks to Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win (their original comment)

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The way things are going we’re all going to be dead before it gets to that point

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Probably because of all the dipshits in this thread specifically, acting like we don’t need to stop extracting and using oil.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This thread is filled with people who don’t grasp what a finite resource is. Saying “I remember hearing that x years ago”. Sure there’s probably more it there somewhere, but we don’t need to have to the finish on this. There are are kids who are going to grow up, people who aren’t born yet. Hell, at current rates, we might fuck up things with climate change. Which, even more reason to use less.

    Call me selfish, but I want my nieces and nephews, to be able to grow up into a prosperous world and not some weird dystopian hellscape.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think our point is that we don’t know if this is a good prediction or not. They both keeps crying wolf.

      We’re not cheering for it, we’re just skeptical.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Skeptical of what? That it’s finite? Or how much is left? Or that climate change is real?

        Because I’m definitely seeing people who think we have unlimited oil, that there’s always going to be more, and that climate change is not only a hoax but isn’t caused by humans at all. Some of those folks are in this thread, some of those folks I know in real life.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    At the current rate of oil consumption there are only 15 years left in the world. So it’s fine.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Honestly we’ve known peak oil would occur in our lives for several decades. Not that you could tell by any project to prepare for such an event.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    The disconnect between the general public and the realities of the petroleum industry may be the largest gap in existence. Pretty much any article you read gets 99% of the info hilariously wrong as the journalist has no idea wtf they’re talking about.

  • johsny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This means that the oil is going to run out in our lifetime.

    Well, not in mine. So good luck with that!

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ll be 91. I’m sure I’ll have bigger problems by that point.

    …such as having been dead for the past 49 years!

  • joostjakob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Glad you already learned this is probably nonsense. The wrong reasoning is very similar to much thought about overpopulation. The amount of people that makes for a place to be overpopulated is a function of how societies work and the technologies they have at hand. One extra issue there is that improvements in technology usually lead to population growth, so much progress gets cancelled out.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve heard this for my whole life. Oil runs out in X years, until they develop affordable ways to dig deeper and get at more

    • UltraHamster64@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, I think quite the opposite. I learned this recently and I was quite surprised no one ever uses this as one of the arguments for renewable sources of energy.

      Because why invest in an industry that is basically declining and wouldn’t be around after 50-60 years.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Consider especially huge infrastructure like refineries, pipelines, shipping terminals, that take many years to break a profit. Why would anyone build those anymore?

        At this point, new exploration and drilling too. I don’t know how long it takes for those to be profitable, but if countries follow through with EV and other targets for renewable energy, we should expect a huge surplus and price drops in less than a decade

  • grandel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Off topic but the amount of oil we have left is the least of humanities’ concerns right now imo.