I know the headline sounds funny, but remember that could kill a diabetic.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Coca-Cola has voluntarily recalled 13,152 cases of Minute Maid Zero Sugar Lemonade because it discovered during an internal investigation that cans labeled as Zero Sugar contain full sugar.

    Not Coke, it’s the lemonade.

      • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You aren’t far off. I’ve been in the Anheuser Busch plant in Cartersville GA about 20 years ago and I swear one line bottled 600 a minute…. Remember thinking how it took two of our plants to keep one of theirs going. You couldn’t see the bottles they moved so fast.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hahahahah Fuck it I’m leaving my long ass conspiracy theory centered around this breakthrough being about Coke Zero specifically and no other drinks comment I responded to someone else with.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Check the label before you drink it, especially if you’re watching your sugar intake for medical reasons.

    Umm. How would checking the label help? If the drinks were labelled correctly, there would be no reason for a recall.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree. The best thing to do is avoid it entirely for now. I’m guessing there are other sugar-free lemonade options. Is Crystal Light still around? I used to like that one.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m super fuckin curious now. As a type 1 diabetes since 12y/o, before the 2010’s the only readily available 0 sugar drink options were water and diet pop. So for idk 20 years I was raised on DP giggety

        Fast forward to the first time I got coke zero from a restaurant when it first came out. I was 100% positive they were putting sugar in it and have not wavered from that unfounded conspiracy theory.

        Even more so after every brand of pop, juice, energy drink after that 2010ish decade had its own zero sugar options on the market. Nothing comes even close to the flavor in coke zero. In the absolute slimmest chance this has been a day 1 fuckup they are just catching I still feel like it could be a very small amount cuz that all it takes to give body to a zero sugar drink.

        My source for this belief can be found in drinks like Gatorade G2 vs GZero, or new Prime energy drinks I see everywhere now, or another good one is the oj brands who offer half the sugar options of OJ.

        You drink a zero sugar drink back to back with any of these example and you will totally get what I’m saying about the empty taste of zero sugar vs the fuller less chemically tasting “low” not “zero” options lisred above.

        Then look at the total carbs of the light sugar options to the full flavor all the sugar options and the one with the highest amount of sugar should be the OJ and even that is only 50% of the full flavored OJ.

        Normal energy drink: 35-50g of carms compared to 6g of carbs in prime. Gatorade: 36g vs G2 is i wanna say 12ga or go further with Gatorade Fit that has a splash of juice and that is a mere 4g of carbs.

        So back to coke zero. It could only take a couple grams per can to get that real coke taste in coke zero. Yes it could cause most diabetics to raise an eyebrow as to why they’re sugar readings after a coke zero are slightly higher but the reality of it is you would haven’t be on the strictest regiment diet of the same exact amount of portions, recipes and execute your insulin delivery efficiency to perfection rotating sites so the same % of injected insulin is retained for every meal and even then the difference from adding a can of coke zero with 4-8g of carb is barely going to move the needle.

        For most diabetic insulin regiments they start you off on a scale of 1unit of insulin per every 12-15g of carbs consumed depending on the person’s size, age etc. Way back when they first trained me I was instructed to round to the nearest 5 and take the closest dose of insulin to match. So a single can isn’t ever going to ruin someone’s night cuz it isnt even enought carbs to round up to take 1 unit on insulin for.

        Still doesn’t make me any less interested if my bat shit crazy conspiracy theory is actually true. Lol

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Did you ever try Pepsi One when it was around? I’m not a huge fan of colas (or sugary drinks in general), but it wasn’t bad compared to most diet sodas I’ve had.

  • diffusive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This was orange juice not coca cola zero (the headline is misleading)

    If i have to guess the gymnic was that they add zero additional sugar (but oranges still have sugar).

    While I hate these misleading names and i am in favour of this kind of actions; i suspect diabetic people are familiar with this BS and would have read the nutrition facts

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lemonade, not orange juice. And no, it was a zero sugar lemonade, artificially sweetened, and they put sugar in it accidentally.

      But I agree, the headline should have been worded better.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      HFCS is sugar. Just not cane sugar. And at the end of the day, sugar is sugar and we shouldn’t be having it all the time.

      • banshee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes but I like making cheap jabs at the drink industry.

        On a serious note - you’re absolutely right to avoid sugar, and I stopped drinking sweetened beverages many years ago. From what I understand though, people would develop fewer health problems if they consumed cane sugar instead of HFCS. Apparently the unbound fructose makes a difference when consuming sugar at such a high volume.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think they changed the formula of their drinks. I haven’t had any in a while, but it was pretty awful when I tried a couple of them a few years ago.

  • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    FYI there is no such thing as truly “zero calorie”. Sure, we can’t use aspartame and those “0 calorie” sweeteners for energy BUT our gut microbes can metabolize those compounds into products that we can then use for energy. So one way or another you’re still taking in calories. Now do you gain more energy from straight sugar vs the sweeteners? I have no idea, I haven’t studied this in years. I just like to bring up that little bit of trivia whenever anyone brings up zero calorie drinks in conversation :)

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        ya I did a lit review for my thesis a few years back, plenty of papers on microbes metabolizing these compounds, shouldn’t be hard to find.

            • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              So after a little research the caloric intake might be more than 0. I feel like your original comment came across as suggesting that “0 calorie” drinks had just as many calories as sugar, which is obviously far from the truth. But this research is interesting and important, and there’s a good chance I read your first comment in bad faith. Thanks for sharing