• ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Catastrophic anthropogenic climate change

    I prefer anthropogenic runaway global heating (ARGH). “Climate change” is a pretty weak formulation of the underlying problem, even weaker than “global warming”.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It chooses to address the effects rather than the cause. Climate change addresses that it’s not just going to get hotter, we’re also experiencing changes to currents in both the air and water, and things like rainfall are going to wildly change. To some people like folks in Bengal the heat is the problem, but to Albertans the issue is that drier conditions will cause increased wildfires, meanwhile over in the eastern United States it’s hurricanes and tornadoes while Western Europe is going to lose its whole “temperate rainforests at a high latitude” thing as the Gulf Stream collapses.

      Oh then things will get real end Permian but that’s more of an atmospheric makeup thing.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Climate change is a phrase created by republican messaging specialist Luntz.

        “The climate has always been changing.” I’m sure you’ve heard that dismissal before, no? Not that it matters. Denialists gonna deny. It’s the same people that will see it snow once in the winter and say “so much for global warming.”

        Everyone knows immigrants caused climate change anyway.