Summ:

  • The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has discovered the most distant galaxy ever confirmed, named JADES-GS-z14-0, which appears as it existed just 290 million years after the Big Bang.

  • The discovery of this surprisingly luminous and massive early galaxy challenges theories about how galaxies formed in the cosmic dawn

  • JWST has been repeatedly breaking its own records for the most distant galaxies since beginning operations in 2022

more about:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjeenyw8rd2o

https://webbtelescope.org/contents/early-highlights/nasas-james-webb-space-telescope-finds-most-distant-known-galaxy

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a shame that things like this don’t make national headlines. I sometimes daydream about how cool it would be if we were all collectively interested in these things.

  • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “A redshift of one corresponds to a distance of more than 10 billion light-years. JWST’s studies showed that JADES-GS-z14-0 has a redshift of 14.32, the highest ever recorded.”

    Wow!

    “Usually gases like oxygen show up only after large groups of stars have lived their lives and died in supernova explosions,” Hainline says. “So seeing oxygen in a galaxy this young is like if you are an anthropologist and you find an enormous, ancient city that has evidence of iPhones.”

    That just boggles the mind!

    Can’t wait to get more data on this wee, spry, bizarre find.

      • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ha ha ha!

        Well…

        We both saw the photo in the article. It’s a big photo, and they had to enlarge the teeny tiny spot this galaxy was in, then blow it up and actually add an arrow to point it out.

        Seems pretty wee to me!

        pikachupokerface.webp

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Size is relative and our perception of time (and the way we measure it) requires us to use numbers so large, most people can’t really visualize at the scales we are talking about.

        Off the top of your head, can you visualize how much space 10 billion apples would take up? Sure, you could calculate it, but it’s likely not something you could instantly visualize in your head.

        Honestly, I don’t know how to solve for that problem.

          • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Being able to visualize how much space something needs only comes with experience, so as long ad you don’t want students to work with 10b apple on a regular basis, education isn’t really able to change this.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Some theories might allude that such brightness comes from a burgeoning supermassive black hole feasting on gas at the center of JADES-GS-z14-0. But in that case, light is usually concentrated into a much smaller region.

    Instead the best explanation Hainline and colleagues have found is that this exceedingly young galaxy has somehow already manufactured about a half billion stars.

    . . . How could a galaxy so young have already sparked so many stellar generations? “Usually gases like oxygen show up only after large groups of stars have lived their lives and died in supernova explosions,” Hainline says. “So seeing oxygen in a galaxy this young is like if you are an anthropologist and you find an enormous, ancient city that has evidence of iPhones.”

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    There was some talk recently that perhaps the universe is as a much as twice as old as we suspected, which could account for (some?) aspects of it we try to explain with dark matter. I wonder if this discovery lends any weight to that?

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wait, if that galaxy didn’t form at the exact same point where the big bang happened (we wouldn’t see it then), then it is likely older. Or the universe is older.