Side note: Does anybody have an effective way of blocking this stupid Admiral BS, I’ve gotten it to a point where it consistently gives me the bypass option but I’d prefer it to go away entirely
I have adblocker solely set up to block Youtube ads.
They broke the implicit contract of “Don’t make ads too intrusive and I won’t go out of my way to block your revenue”. THEY DREW FIRST BLOOD
If you’re seeing these, then you need to change your settings in Ublock Origin to enable more filters. Anti-adblock killer is the filter you want, I believe.
If they really wanted me to whitelist them in my adblocker, they’d make the ads less onerous.
Using the “bypass paywalls clean” extension gets rid of most of it. I’m using Firefox.
I’ve never seen this. Just checked ZDNet’s website and it didn’t show anything about my ad blocker.
I block ads because they are such a distraction that I can’t read, and because auctioning off arbitrary javascript to the highest bidder is just asking to be hacked. If ads were not animated, and had no external or obfuscated javascript, I might not block them.
But as is, I’d rather close the tab than enable ads.
It might have to do with the aggressiveness that I block ADs, I have ad blocking at the device and network levels. Since I also have a way to over-powered pfSense server I pretty much don’t care about all those giant dnsbl lists that have the “Performance hit warning” lmao
I do feel guilty sometimes… Then I continue.
Just like I do when I watch the porn the adblocker’s help me watch…
Those messages do make me feel bad, but not bad enough to turn my ad blocker off.
I’m technically capable of blocking ads but that doesn’t mean that I am also morally entitled to access content provided to me on the condition that I will see the ads. I suppose the fact that these websites only ask me to disable my ad blocker rather than refusing me access entirely implies that they give consent for me to keep using the ad blocker, but would I really stop using it if they did refuse access but I could bypass that restriction?
I leave uBlock off by default and only turn it on for abusive sites, but I also use Vivaldi with tracker blocking enabled so I still get these popups.
It usually ends with me blocking all ads in order to block the popup asking me not to block ads.
If it’s a site I use regularly, I’ll disable ad blocker, especially news. It’d be childish demand people provide me their time, labour and effort for free, especially when the ads cost me nothing.
I’ve tried that before, was I rewarded with peaceful well placed ADs? Hell no, I was inundated with full page auto-playing monstrosities so fuck that.
Maybe if it’s a small time website I’ll just pay with donations or a subscription, but fuck these big time conglomerate owned websites
Have you subscribed or paid for many? If so, thank you! But sadly, most of us don’t.
I’m not talking big conglomerates, I’m talking about independent journalism or folks who are working to build something meaningful or beneficial to me, like webcomics or fantasy hockey.
Since people started getting news online for free, quality independent journalism has plummeted and we’ve been left with mostly corpo media with a few indies hanging on or getting absorbed into corpo. I think it’s a tragedy which adblockers have accelerated.
I don’t demand anything, but I’m not responsible for making sure anyone else makes money. Sell it, give it away, or don’t. Don’t beg me to allow third parties to infect my devices just because they paid you to ask me.
How do you expect the websites you use to exist if everyone ad blocks them?
Lot’s of websites exist. How did they do it before invasive ads and tracking?
Back in the day, before ad blockers general unobtrusive ads generated more revenue per site visit. As ad blockers become popular, the value of those same ads were worth less.
So, to answer your question, they were able to pay the bills with discreet ads which we decided were too annoying, leading to the current spiral of decline.
Spicy take these days.
Yup. Everyone wants everything free but simultaneously want a high standard of wages for everyone except whomever is providing them a service.
Folks dress it up in whatever nonsensical rationale they’d like but really, I think we’re just selfish.
I demand control over my computing on my hardware. After I casually request media do not feel entitled to run anti-features without my permission.
I do think that hard effort to create works should be rewarded but I do believe ads have a cost - and it’s too damn high.
How do you reward the work you encounter online?
I buy merchandise from video creators, do non-annual donations (1 is annual) and assume commission for affiliate links can happen in the background when I buy stuff.
I admit I mostly give back to bigger players (e.g. my OS creator), and less so to those who are just starting off that don’t see as much.
give us money!
Dude, I don’t even know you. I’ll never be back here again.
