- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Almost but not quite.
Not necessarily. A 500 response means internal server error and could be anything. Returning a 500 doesn’t indicate any protections just that there was a server error. I guess that it returned anything would mean the server is still running but it takes time to delete everything
I’m going to start doing this on all posts 😂
Dammit so we can’t stop Skynet!
Skynet’s existence is contingent on the Terminator movies remaining profitable, so Dark Fate’s performance might have averted Judgment Day.
Unplug it?
Reminds me of “If you want God Mode, hold Alt and press F4”
Delete system32 to make your computer run faster.
Deltree asterisk.asterisk
Can’t post the actual asterisks because formatting syntax…
deltree *.*
there ya go
Magic, thank you.
When you delete system32, you call the shots.
It is moments like this where I wished docker didn’t exist. Could have made some news headlines.
Could
ofhave madeor
Could ofCould’ve madeCould of’d made
Is this considered chaotic neutral
How dare you correct my high in the morning ass!
That being said, I made the edit. I bet it made the comment better.
My sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error.
It’s not you. It’s me.
No problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day.
And if not take a hit 😎
I hope they are using more than just docker for isolation 😅 Each user should be running in a different VM for security.
The only fuckers who are getting their own VM is enterprise lol. I can’t imagine they give that much of a fuck about their average user.
I ask out of ignorance - Why is docker insufficient for isolation?
The short answer is that Docker (and other containerization technologies) share the Linux kernel with the host. The Linux kernel is very complicated and shouldn’t be trusted to be vulnerability free. Exploitable bugs are regularly discovered in the Linux kernel (and Windows and Darwin). No serious companies separate different tenets with just container technology. Look at GCP, AWS, DigitalOcean… they all use hardware virtualization which is much simpler and much more likely to be secure (but even then bugs are found on occasion).
So in theory it is secure, but it is just too complex to rely on. I say that docker is good for “mostly trusted” isolation. Different organizations in the same companies, different software that isn’t actively trying to be malicious. But shouldn’t be used to separate different untrusted parties.
This is way more fun with
shred -f -u
