LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agoI wonder how many countries would get annexed before somebody realizes that it's not exactly the most effective method to combat inflationsh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1227arrow-down12
arrow-up1225arrow-down1external-linkI wonder how many countries would get annexed before somebody realizes that it's not exactly the most effective method to combat inflationsh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoBut then you’ll add a bunch of left-leaning citizens to the voter pool, which screws the Republicans in the long run. You know what, this is starting to sound like a less bad idea
minus-squareweeeeum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoBold to assume we’d have another election for that to matter Or that the democrats won’t snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again.
minus-squarePuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoThey keep saying “51st state”, which implies Canada will only be a single state under the electoral college, and thus will be shafted just like California.
minus-squarePalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoHe should have said territory. The people wouldn’t even be able to vote then.
But then you’ll add a bunch of left-leaning citizens to the voter pool, which screws the Republicans in the long run.
You know what, this is starting to sound like a less bad idea
Bold to assume we’d have another election for that to matter
Or that the democrats won’t snatch defeat from the jaws of victory again.
They keep saying “51st state”, which implies Canada will only be a single state under the electoral college, and thus will be shafted just like California.
He should have said territory. The people wouldn’t even be able to vote then.