From https://reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1hokr0c/mozilla_chair_pay_vs_firefox_market_share_2023/m4aca4j/:

Total 2022 pay: $6,903,089
Total 2023 pay: $6,260,072 - a $643,017 decrease
Base chair pay: $600,000
2023 chair bonuses and other incentives: $5,622,600

Sources:

For comparison, here are other executive salaries ($0 bonuses for each)

Executive name Title Total Pay (2023)
MARK SURMAN PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 715,143
J. BOB ALOTTA SVP, GLOBAL PROGRAMS 508,138
ANGELA PLOHMAN COO, SECRETARY & TREASURER 452,234
ASHLEY BOYD SVP, GLOBAL ADVOCACY 427,701
ZHILUN PANG DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 273,069
DAVID WALKER SENIOR COUNSEL 268,565
LAINIE DECOURSY DIRECTOR, ORG EFFECTIVENESS 267,028
JUAN BARANI SENIOR DIRECTOR, GIFT PLANNING 262,879
STEPHANIE WRIGHT SR PROGRAM MANAGER, MOZFEST 236,785
  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    21 days ago

    til my favorite browser has been losing a lot of ground over the years, i guess i’ve been living in my foxy bubble

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      21 days ago

      The fact you’re on lemmy puts you in good company I believe. I, too, am fighting the chromium curse.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Usually I find these kinds of “non profit CEOs shouldn’t make money” things kind of annoying but honestly I don’t see any argument for a CEO to make more than a couple million regardless of context.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    This graph shows a disingenuous relationship between revenue and the market share of a free and open source project within the walls of a not-for-profit organization. Firefox is not a revenue stream in the traditional sense. In fact, most of Mozilla 's money comes from grants and donations for projects and research they do.

    I get that CEO=EVIL is a viral topic these days but if all you know about Mozilla is that they make the Not Chrome browser, then you should really educate yourself on what it is that Mozilla actually does for the internet. Then you might feel a little better with this pay scale graph.

    That all aside, this graph shows the market share of Mozilla when there were 5 browsers available to the vast majority of users, Internet Explorer, Firefox, chrome, Opera, and safari. It’s also before chrome took over the market share from IE at the same time that it pushed out Firefox as the leading browser because chrome was available on the iPhone and was the default browser on Android devices. Hardly a surprise to see that when the internet exploded in users and literally every human being started to carry around a chrome device in their pockets that Mozilla Firefox’s market share went down.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      How much money do they actually spend on the development of Firefox? That’s a figure I haven’t been able to find. However, in 2023, they had $1.5 billion in assets.

      The only justification for a high-paying CEO is if they need to coordinate some large scale fundraising effort - schmoozing with other rich fucks to gain further donations, and plotting elaborate strategies to get more donations.

      They have $1.5 billion in assets. How much more do they really need? Need someone to manage Mozilla’s assets? Make me the CEO. I’ll do it for you. In fact, I’ll do it for free. That will be my contribution to the Firefox project. I’ll stick that $1.5 billion in simple bond and index funds and withdraw at a very conservative 2% rate. And that will provide $30 million a year to spend on developers to improve Firefox and other projects. And we can just keep doing that forever. I’ll purposefully withdraw funds at a rate lower than the market averages, so the real value of the endowment grows over time. And that will allow us to slowly expand the scope of operations and start new projects. And while I won’t spend any time or effort to schmooze and jet set across the country to kiss the ass of some billionaire, if one wants to throw some money in the pot, we’ll have a donation button on the website.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 days ago

    It’s sad to see Firefox continue to lose popularity I thought there might be some kind of comeback but no.

    • tbird83ii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 days ago

      Part of the problem is both Chrome and Edge come installed by default on the company’s own products, and they have massive campaigns to keep you from switching, since user data is so profitable for them to sell.

      It is up to us, the “person who does IT for the whole family” to beat back the other browsers.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Ugh I use Firefox because fuck chrome, but they do have some really annoying ass bugs that should have been dealt with long ago before they kept adding features.

  • Mike85k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    What is a senior director of gift planning and how does that justify a salary of $260k?

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    20 days ago

    The market share plot looks suspiciously clean, where are those numbers from?

    Edit: looks like they’re from page view data. I know I spoof my browser to show chrome for better compatibility, I wonder how common that is among Firefox users.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      I spoof my browser (Librewolf) as Firefox for privacy and I don’t encounter issues from not reporting my user agent as Chrome/Chromium. I think it’s pretty uncommon for a website to not work on Firefox, so I don’t see how this is necessary. The Chrome Mask extension is meant to be used on a per-site basis.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      Do you use this extension? it allows you to do that on a site-by-site basis. Maybe only do it for sites with compatibility issues? You can report them right from the extension.

  • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 days ago

    If this inclusive to all the forks? Alot of folks run forks cus they don’t like both ff and chrome. Just sayin.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Doesn’t matter, all the forks combined make up a fraction of FF.

      Plus people moving to forks still hurts Mozilla

      • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Well they can suck the doodoo out my butthole cus that’s what they get if they keep going the wannabe big tech company route.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    He is obviously way too highly paid by an insane amount, but where are these people going? There’s no way they’re all going to Chrome, right?